Topic
Commentary: The Packraft in 2013
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Campfire › Editor’s Roundtable › Commentary: The Packraft in 2013
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Nov 21, 2012 at 7:56 am #1296279
Companion forum thread to:
Nov 21, 2012 at 10:02 am #1930151David, thanks for the highly persuasive article!
Nov 21, 2012 at 10:14 am #1930156Good stuff…currently trying to decide on rafts for the wife and I for pretty much the "serious weight savings in serious conditions, but not serious whitewater" that you describe (thinking linking up big loops in Escalante/Roost area, crossings, etc). Affordability is important since we're looking at two. The scout is leading the pack at this point…the Curiyak looks good but it's a decent amount more expensive and a full pound heavier (and we're reasonably short). The flytepacker price and weight is appealing but the extra width (for flat paddling) and durability are a bit concerning.
Nov 21, 2012 at 10:42 am #1930164For me bottom durability is a big deal with packrafts. I think they'll invariably be used in shallow rivers and creeks. This is what concerns me about the current Flytepacker, and what has impressed me most about my '10 Yak.
FWIW Flytepacker told me, during correspondence for this article, that they're working on a burlier raft which would be more direct competition for the main line Alpackas. I hope they succeed.
Nov 21, 2012 at 12:03 pm #1930187Thanks David,
The short reviews of alpacka dry suit coming today?(like said in last letter of next week coming?)
If not,any first opinion about durability and dryness?J-F
Nov 22, 2012 at 6:04 am #1930315Would love to hear about the applicability of these new ultralite drysuits to Nordic Skating where a fall through the ice can be life threatening…
Nov 28, 2012 at 1:46 pm #1931777The drysuit update will have to come from Ryan. It certainly seems like it could be a good option for skating on thin ice.
Folks should also take a look at Alpacka's latest close-hold innovations: the Cargo Fly (https://www.alpackaraft.com/index.cfm/store.catalog?CategoryID=65). It's a zipper on the stern which allows gear to be stowed inside the tubes. Retrofittable on 2010 and newer boats.
My initial reaction, for my own use, is meh. I have no doubt it works very well if you balance the load, but as I said above packrafts are already too complicated. Nonetheless, huge credit to Alpacka for not resting on their laurels. We now await the tricked out, full on, 1300-1400 dollar whitewater boat.
Dec 11, 2012 at 11:22 am #1934765Nice article.
Could you change the table to read in grams instead of fractions of kilograms? It would be much easier to read/comprehend.
Dec 13, 2012 at 7:51 am #1935209Nice summation! For Jackson Hole Packraft & Packraft Rentals Anywhere a switch flipped in July. We went from struggling to get people interested in packrafting to needing more rental boats. We're even doing some December rentals!
Next year we're going to offer both the a Denali Llama with the whitewater deck & the FeatherCraft self bailing boat (the latter seems great for roadside & short hikes, family trips and rivers where a double hull is required – or for kayakers who don't sweat the difference between a few pounds, thinking its all lightweight).
We're definitely on the cusp of widespread interest in the sport ….
Feb 7, 2013 at 12:07 pm #1951810David, thanks, very awesome!
"It (Alpacas) will be an expert’s tool, and while it might weigh 5 kilos"
It seems to be truly, for example, old Alpacka weighed only 1.7 kg! (http://www.canoekayak.com/canoe/alpackaraft/). Now we have additional pound!May be do you have some additional info about weight/size dynamics of Alpacas from the beginning to the present day?
Feb 7, 2013 at 12:43 pm #1951829"May be do you have some additional info about weight/size dynamics of Alpacas from the beginning to the present day?"
A good question. I don't have direct access to enough boats to provide solid numbers, but it's easy to speculate.
The original Alpacka, sans skirt and seat and with a small stern, was a bit under 4 pounds. Not much more than my 2013 Scout, which has smaller main tubes but a large stern. The first attached decks were heavier (70D?) sil, and thus I would assume a bit lighter than the current cruiser deck, with its heavier fabric, zippers, and lap pillow. The 2010 boats got a substantially larger stern, and then again the first pointy boats in 2011. Neither of these added much weight, but they did add some.
So how did a conventional boat go from 4 pounds to 6 in the last ten years? The deck and seat/backrest account for most of it, with smaller amounts going to the added fabric in the boat, and perhaps extra tie downs and thigh straps.
I bought the aforementioned Scout through the end of the year sale to test just what the limitations of the small, deckless boat would be under serious conditions. With four tie downs added (three for the pack, one on the floor for a seat) it weighs 3 lb 11 oz, and packs to about half the size of my 2010 Yak w/ deck and wilderness thigh straps (1.5" poly webbing). I haven't had it on the water yet (it's all frozen), but I imagine an article will come out of this experiment.
Feb 7, 2013 at 1:26 pm #1951840It seems that there is a good spectrum of lightweight packable water craft in 2013: from foldable/inflatable kayaks on one end, to ultralight 2-3lb boats.
Now I hope that the cottage industry will turn some attention to the PFD. As of right now, there aren't a whole lot of lightweight solutions.
I ended up ordering a Stormy Seas SV100 (which is not certified by the US Coast Guard btw), which came to $160 CDN once the dust settled (USD conversion, shipping, duty tax).
I realize that certifications, different governing authorities in different countries, and the potential for opening oneself up for litigation is maybe not an attractive prospect for a cottage gear shop owner.
If companies didn't want to sell PFDs, they might be able to sell DIY kits, or even the individual parts: oral inflation tubes, inflation bladders, valves, materials, patterns. As of right now, even getting good materials for a MYOG PFD is tricky.
Feb 7, 2013 at 1:52 pm #1951858I don't think you can get much lighter than what already exists and still provide the necessary flotation for big/fast water.
You can always strap some air-filled platys to yourself for paddling flat water, at your own risk of course.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.