Topic
Lightning Ascent – women’s vs men’s
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › General Forums › Winter Hiking › Lightning Ascent – women’s vs men’s
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Nov 14, 2012 at 9:43 pm #1296069
Hi. In David Chenault's latest (well-done) article on human-powered snow travel, he made a big recommendation for choosing the narrower women's ascent over the men's. The argument, which is sound, was that the narrower shoe would make for a more normal gate while snowshoeing.
Question: has anybody gone this route? Seems like the biggest potential disadvantage is less flotation. Any thoughts on this?
Nov 16, 2012 at 4:52 pm #1929022Thought the Lightning were super for flotation anyway. Yes, they provide some, but their bigger advantage is traction on relatively packed trails. If float is your bigger concern, I'd consider something like the Atlas 10 or 12 series….
Nov 16, 2012 at 6:32 pm #1929054How does it work if we chose to get the Womens snowshoe but size up by one unit. Eg: Going by weight I need a 22" Mens snowshoe. I'm thinking to go with 25" womens to compensate for the loss of flotation. Thoughts?
Nov 16, 2012 at 6:39 pm #1929061but one other thought occurred to me. The decking / binding / crampon used to have issues with reliability (if you want I can find some loooong threads on ADKHighPeaks forum about this). Anyway. I'd ink that if you chose the narrower ones for your weight, there'd be additional stress on that point, since the moment arm would be shorter.
Nov 16, 2012 at 7:58 pm #1929098Being a cross-country skier I opted for the narrow ones too – did that when they first hit the shelves.
Nov 18, 2012 at 7:40 pm #1929505Dan, 3 inches is not a big deal when you consider 22"-25" snowshoes. In my neck of the woods(Cascades Oregon and Washinton) where its more of concrete snow, everyone suggests to go with MSR lightening. But I also plan to use this in dry now ( East of Oregon).
Can you please share your opinion if it helped you, going with women's snowshoe with extra length.
Nov 18, 2012 at 8:30 pm #1929527That extra 3 inches of length really isn't a huge deal one way or the other. You'll gain a bit of float, a bit of weight, and lose a tiny bit of maneuverability.
Bigger snowshoes will float better, but honestly snowshoeing in deep light snow is not fun. Has to be done sometimes, but I always wish I had skis.
Nov 19, 2012 at 3:51 pm #1929713Thanks David, I think going with Women's snowshoe with 3" of additional length makes sense.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.