Topic
Mountain Laurel Designs TrailStar Shelter Review
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Campfire › Editor’s Roundtable › Mountain Laurel Designs TrailStar Shelter Review
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jan 31, 2012 at 9:53 am #1832211
Nicholas,
Nice photos. How's that BearPaw inner working for you? How's the space inside?Jan 31, 2012 at 10:09 am #1832219I've only used the Bearpaw innernet on a couple of trips. So far it seems to work out fine if a little bit of a hassle to set up.
There's plenty of space for two adults and their gear, in fact we fit our 100 lb lab in there with us with enough room for everyone.
The set-up of the innert net is a little fiddly. Maybe I haven't mastered the most efficient method yet, but what I do is stake out four of the corners of the TS, then run the pole that will be the center pole of the TS through the inner net and place it in its position under the shelter. Then center the net tent door where I want it, get the five corners of the TS where I want them and then attach the corners of the inner net to the lines coming off the TS.
The net seems to work best with a higher pitch in order to get all the slack out of the walls and maximize usable interior space. I haven't experimented too much with alternative TS pitches while using the net tent… more to come this spring, I'm sure.
Jan 31, 2012 at 10:16 am #1832224Thanks Nicholas. I've experimented with two-person bug net options as well, and yes, it can be fiddly. Just the nature of the beast, I guess.
Jan 31, 2012 at 10:19 am #1832229I set it up the same way—
1. Plan to pitch it high.
2. Stake out Trailstar.
3. Insert inner with pole threaded through.
4. Spread out the inner so the corners are somewhat close to the corners of the shelter.
5. Connect guy lines to existing stakes on the back and sides
6. Stake out two front points separatelyI've noticed I need to stake out the two door point separately for a truly taut pitch, but it works really well once it's set up! Plenty of livable space.
Jan 31, 2012 at 11:49 am #1832259Bump for photos:
Pitched high for 3 late summer, giving my son room to wiggle around under a quilt.
Trailstar on the Ozark Highland Trail.
Jan 31, 2012 at 12:03 pm #1832264Do you guys find that it's easy to get in/out of the Trailstar? Pitched low, it looks like you might almost have to crawl in/out of the shelter. Even when it's pitched high, the door looks pretty low to the ground.
Jan 31, 2012 at 12:04 pm #1832266"Left to right, MLD Cricket, Trailstar, and Supermid. Overnight, winds picked up on the ridge line gusting to roughly 30 miles per hour. The Trailstar definitely handled it best despite a pretty crappy pitch and none of the midpanel guy out points used."
If I recall correctly, it was the Trailstar owner that got up in the middle of the night to re-stake and shovel. ;)
To the Cricket question—pitched properly and with the proper stakes, this could be a legit light snow shelter. I was using tubular stakes and groundhogs, so I didn't get the taughtness I wanted, for fear of flying nighttime stakes. I also ended up accidentally pitching into the wind, which didn't help matters. With some snow stakes and a low pitch, it isn't a bad option. The downside, of course, is less space than a full trailstar, which would be especially nice for wintertime when you want more space, but the little porch does help.
Jan 31, 2012 at 12:08 pm #1832267No restaking, just sealing a draft that was blowing snow in!
Jan 31, 2012 at 12:15 pm #1832272Kyle- What kind of snow anchors to you use with your TS?
Eugene- Nice photos. It really is an elegant shelter, isn't it?
Jan 31, 2012 at 12:25 pm #1832277Since we have snow called "cascade concrete" around here, I use typical snow stakes like the MSR Blizzards. The Supermid was held in place by snow anchors like these though, and they seemed really nice to use.
Jan 31, 2012 at 12:41 pm #1832287Heh, yeah, I actually have both of those. I did some tests last weekend using both types on the same shelter in some powder. After work-hardening them into the snow and letting them set up over night, the Blizzards were much harder to remove than the REI ones. However, when initially setting them in the snow, the REI anchors held better.
Jan 31, 2012 at 12:49 pm #1832293@Nicholas, thanks for sharing your photos and experience. Is there room in the Bearpaw inner for two adults (i.e. with a 2 person quilt) to sleep next to each other without one being completely up against the side? In order to do this would you have to angle to center pole away to one side?
Jan 31, 2012 at 12:51 pm #1832294Bear Paw's Pentanet won't pitch properly at all with the pole askew. You could ask to have the hole in the floor moved, but I can only imagine that would make the shelter exponentially harder to pitch correctly. The wife and I sleep with a pole between us : [
Jan 31, 2012 at 12:59 pm #1832298How well would it work to use an inverted 'V' to open up the floor for the inner? I suppose you would have to have a second pair of poles or pole jacks to make it work… I'm just not sure how that would affect the tensions of each of the panels.
Jan 31, 2012 at 1:22 pm #1832311@ Andrew,
The entrance to the Trailstar is not unusually low when pitched in storm mode (down to the ground), comparable toto tarps I have had in the past (MLD Grace duo, Oware Cat2). I'm 6' and a little crawl or squat is all that is necessary. Interior height isn't what you find on the Duomid or other mids of that style, but it isn't crammed- easy to sit up inside. For fair weather you can pitch the front pole high and enter with ease. There isn't one way to pitch this thing, so making a higher entrance is up to you and the conditions.
Jan 31, 2012 at 1:49 pm #1832323I don't know if using an off-centered pole would work when pitching the TS with the inner net. You would, at a minimum, need to have some kind of cap or piece of wood or something to rest the tip of the pole on so as to not puncture your floor. There may be problems with the geometry too and get getting a taut pitch to the trailstar and/or inner net… could be worth exploring though…
Other solutions would be to hang the trailstar from an overhead branch by the exterior loop on the peak. The inner net could then be hung from the loop on the interior of the TS peak. That would eliminate poles entirely from the shelter interior and would likely provide enough room for 3.
Or, if you have a 2nd set of poles (or pole jacks) handy, you could probably set up an inverted V pole arrangement to support the trailstar and again hang the net tent from the interior loop at the peak of the trailstar. This would again leave all of the interior space inside of the net tent pole-free. I don't have a second set of poles (or any pole jacks) so I've never tried this arrangement (one of us hikes with poles, the other gets to be dog handler).
Maybe this weekend I can try the off-set center pole just to see if it's even possible.
Here's the inner net sans trailstar; there's any number of ways to arrange the pads, I just threw them in there to show what could fit:
Feb 1, 2012 at 9:55 am #1832764Thanks, Kyle and Nicholas, for your responses! It seems like an inverted V with two trekking poles could work in theory. I guess as Jeremy pointed out the key question would be if having the poles configured like that would affect the panel tension and strength of the shelter overall, one of its key benefits.
Thanks for the picture of the net tent too! That really helps to see what is possible in there.
Feb 1, 2012 at 10:33 am #1832784Bearpaw has two 2-person innernets that will work with the Trailstar:
There are tradeoffs between the two, so you'll have to determine what is more important for you.
The PentaNet 2 is larger, and weighs more, but provides more netting protection, and the rooms it takes up means smaller vestibules. The PyraNet 2 is smaller, but can still accomodate two people. The PyraNet 2 can also be twirled around the center pole, so you determine where you want the doors to be relative to the tent opening, and being smaller will allow more room for your vestibule space. The PyraNet 2 can also better accomodate the lower pitch configurations of the Trailstar than the PentaNet 2. So, the PyraNet 2 is more versatile than the PentaNet 2, in exchange for netting space.
Also, with either innernet, you have the choice of what material to use (silnylon, cuben), the thickness of the No-See-um material, the height of the sidings, and the number of doors and where to put them on the innernet. And you can also request custom modifications. John Stultz, the owner of Bearpaw, has been very helpful with me on the numerous questions I asked him about his innernets.
Feb 2, 2012 at 4:40 pm #1833528A few more Trailstar photos and a link to a video of the cuben version http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vmneOE4j2s. Still waiting on mine :(.
Feb 4, 2012 at 10:06 pm #1834670I am new to backpacking and currently use a TarpTent Rainbow, but have been interested in just using a tarp. Would this be a good way to start? The comments are all so favorable.
Thanks,
Feb 5, 2012 at 7:39 am #1834752I don't see why not if it's of suitable size for you; it's a little trickier than some tarps to pitch, but nothing that a little practice in the backyard wouldn't fix (that goes for any tarp btw)
Feb 5, 2012 at 8:32 am #1834763@Ronda:
The TS would be a great first tarp. Take a look at Eugene's set-up video (someone mentioned it above and linked on MLD's site too) to see how easy it can be to pitch. Obviously, where you pitch it can change how fast it takes to set-up.
http://desertpaincave.blogspot.com/
You CAN go with lighter tarps but often at the expense of cost (to get a lighter material for the same coverage, currently cuben) or room (smaller tarps will weigh less), which are factors that an experienced tarp user or true SUL hiker will consider.
The TS will give you great coverage for 1 or 2 people — and you can always move to a small and lighter 1-person tarp once you've played around with the TS.
Feb 13, 2012 at 9:36 pm #1839168The Trailstar is a good shelter.
Sometimes I love it, sometimes I don't.It takes some practise to get the setup right, so definintely learn it before you use it the first time.
the footprint is huge and can be annoying sometimes. but it can be setup almost everywhere and it is just a matter of practising anyway.
emergency camp right on the trail, btw little bushes or twigs hold better than most stakes would do.the guy outs should be long (mld recommends 60cm, I would rather go for 80cm or more), so that one is able to pitch it in awkward location and tie rocks to them…
terra rosa gear from Sydney made me a custom innernet for my trailstar, which worked out pretty good, it was a prototype, so it needs a few small tweeks. but it can even be used with a low pitch (90 cm)
I might go back to using a bivy though, easier and faster to use for me.
Condensation is still an issue with this shelter, but you can dry it really fast and shake it off too.
I would really like to see how the cuben version does, cuben does not gain as much weight as silnylon in humid conditions and also has less built up condensation.
I couldn't test my trailstar in really windy conditions.
But I had it in some nasty humid weather instead; where any shelter becomes a cold sauna. No wind, camped on wet grass and massive dew everywhere. Well, it was near a rainforest. :)Bottom line: get good stakes and use rocks or the vegetation if needed, learn to pitch it, condensation can always occur but is managable, enjoy the views
Heck, even the local cows like it.
Feb 20, 2012 at 2:46 pm #1842038Looks like the Trailstar is now $185, up from $170.
Apr 10, 2012 at 10:29 am #1865739It's been two and a half months since the first impressions were posted, and we were told:
"This will be a rolling review, and I’ll add more content (at this URL) as it becomes available."
In the comments on the day it was published, Ryan said:
"I've learned a lot since the field testing that went into this initial review, and have now had the shelter in heavy snows and high winds. This is a bad weather shelter. And a good one. More on that in future installments of the review."
Can any of the BPL staff tell the subscribers when we might see said future installments? I for one am eager to read the updates.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.