Topic
Performance Appraisal of the Tarptent Moment
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Campfire › Editor’s Roundtable › Performance Appraisal of the Tarptent Moment
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jul 27, 2010 at 12:10 pm #1261622
Companion forum thread to:
Jul 27, 2010 at 12:44 pm #1632687Nice review. It seemed to me like there was less condensation in my Moment when I expanded my ground cloth to cover the vestibule areas. Might have worked because I was in a low-lying area along a river.
Jul 27, 2010 at 12:58 pm #1632689Given the popularity of tarptents, this test/review is obviously timely, and the article contains plenty of good data. However, and especially relative to the norm for reviews here, I found that data difficult to find.
The structure of the article is lacking; it wanders from topic to topic with little summary or connectedness, returning to topics previously covered with little explication. The presence of charts early in the article, and comparison to only one other tent are perhaps the most egregious examples, mostly because the necessity of the "performance appraisal" is not well explained, and the use of the Firstlight only is not explained in any way that approaches adequate.
I also think that 5 nights use is an inadequate test period. This may have caused and or aggravated the problem of coherence in the review.
Jul 27, 2010 at 1:27 pm #1632696My only comment is that my findings support the likes / dislikes. The management of condensation in this shelter is quite difficult, especially for taller folks.
Edit / added: I have not had the same condensation issues in my Rainbow. So not all are created equal.
Agree – strange comparison to the BD.
Jul 27, 2010 at 1:42 pm #1632700Agree, 5 nights is not rally adequate. I would have liked to see it tested in more substantial winds and heavier rains…
But yeah, pretty much all Tarptents suffer condensation issues. Not my choice for the fourth season.
Jul 27, 2010 at 1:54 pm #1632704I have had a Moment for about six months and am mostly happy with it. I get condensation also, but since this is my first single wall tent, I can't say whether the Moment is worst in this regard than similar tents. The tent is large enough so that one person can avoid contact with the wet walls in any case. I simply wipe down the walls with a bandanna in the morning.
The fact that the Moment has only two stakes is a two edged sword. It makes it very easy to set up, but in windy conditions you are relying on only two stakes to hold the tent down. One of the supplied needle stakes pulled out in windy conditions (estimated at least 30 mph) last February at Point Reyes National Seashore, perhaps because I hadn't set it properly. I replaced my tent stakes with MSR Ground Hog stakes for more wind stability, and haven't had problems with that issue since.
Most people will like this tent if they can deal with the condensation and wind deflection over 30 mph. I think it is a good trade off for the light weight.
Jul 27, 2010 at 2:21 pm #1632717These metric conversion figures are from the manufacturers sites.
Tarptent Moment metric conversions
Weight: 28.5 ounces (810g) Optional crossing pole:7 ounces (200 g)
Interior Height: 40" (102 cm)
Floor Area: 18 sq ft (1.67 sq m)
Vestibule Area: 6.6 sq ft (0.61 sq m)
Floor Width : 20"(51cm) ends; 42"(107 cm) mid 5" (13 cm) bathtub floor walls
Floor Length: 84" (213 cm)2009 Black Diamond First Light metric conversions
Average Packed Weight : 1.5 kg, 3 lb 5 oz
Minimum Weight : 1.28 kg, 2 lb 13 oz
Dimensions : 208 x 123 x 123 x 107 cm, 82 x 48 x 48 x 42 in
Area : 2.5 m², 27.3 sq ft
Packed Size : 15 x 23 cm, 6 x 9 inJul 27, 2010 at 2:36 pm #1632724Very good review. I'm glad to see a review by BPL of this tent. I came across it a couple of months ago online and have been looking for good reviews of it.
I had seen another video on youtube about this tent, and in that video, it was demonstrated that you can raise the walls at the bottom of the pole while you're inside the tent, in order to improve ventilation. Did you try that? I also thought that there is a solid covering you can zip up on the two ends, to enclose them in case of really bad weather.
At any rate, this is the tent I want to go with. The thing I like best about single-wall tents is that you can set them up in rain without getting the inside of the tent soaked, as you would with a double-wall tent.
I like this tent a lot. I don't think any tent on the market, single-wall or double, is impervious to some amount of condensation – it's sort of the nature of the beast, I guess.
Are there guy-out points on the tent so that it would withstand wind a little better?
Jul 27, 2010 at 2:54 pm #1632729"At any rate, this is the tent I want to go with. The thing I like best about single-wall tents is that you can set them up in rain without getting the inside of the tent soaked, as you would with a double-wall tent."
Yes, but then it can rain inside on you.
"I like this tent a lot. I don't think any tent on the market, single-wall or double, is impervious to some amount of condensation – it's sort of the nature of the beast, I guess."
Double walled shelters with solid inner tents prevent the condensation from dropping on you. In addition, a solid or netted inner makes managing the condensation much easier keeping your sleeping bag, etc, dry.
One issue of this shape in single wall design is that you sleep with the fabric very close to your face and this area will accumulate a lot of condensation. The foot end does not allow much movement to prevent some touching of the sides of the shelter with your sleeping bag.
Jul 27, 2010 at 3:42 pm #1632739It appears that the author of this article has given us brief and rather unorganized first impressions based on 5 nights' use. He has not used it in severe storms or in high winds, but, based only on his visual impressions, states that it would not work in such conditions even though he has not experienced them. (My own experience is that Tarptents are a lot tougher than they appear!) It also appears that the author did not use the generally accepted methods of reducing condensation (such as avoiding camping down low in river valleys, setting the tent under trees, etc.) I'd like to see comparisons with single-wall silnylon solo tents of the same class. Examples would be the Tarptent Sublite Sil and Contrail, the Six Moon Designs Lunar Solo and several others that have recently hit the market. The Black Diamond First Light is a completely different type of tent, being made of breathable fabric. It depends on the fabric, rather than on ventilation features, to reduce condensation. It is therefore not comparable to the Moment or any other silnylon tent.
To me, this article is a haphazard reporting of first impressions, not a true review! IMHO, it is definitely not up to the usual BPL standards.
I do agree with the reviewer that those Easton stakes are pretty useless! Some years back, Henry Shires sent out Ti shepherds crook stakes with his tents; I found those more durable than the Easton, which bend more easily and whose tops tend to pop off the first time they are pulled out of the ground.
Jul 27, 2010 at 3:47 pm #1632743The BD Firstlight is listed at 3.3 lbs with a 9ft sq vestibule at $320.
That is not correct. The vestibule is an extra 21oz at an additional $135.
That is a total of $455 (about $20-30 less shopping around) at a total weight of 4.65lbs.
FrancoJul 27, 2010 at 7:55 pm #1632819I purchased my Tarptent Moment last spring, and used it on a Memorial weekend trip to Big South Fork NRRA in Tennessee. It was a two night trip. I look forward to using it again.
It was hot and humid with the night time temps down in the long sleeve shirt range. I've been using a tarp and it is the first tent I have used for backpacking in over 12 years. It's also the first time in that many years that I have done a trip in warm, buggy type weather. It was great to have the bug barrier as there are these really big millipedes in the woods down there. When you step on one it sounds like a twig snapping. There was some condensation, but more trips in different weather will tell the tale.
It is lightweight, quick(<3 minutes with a little practice) & easy to set up,…and easy to move. I had plenty of room for my NeoAir mat and my belongings inside (I'm 5'9"). I could sit or change clothes without hitting the tent walls. Vestibule was perfect for my pack, boots, and cook set. It did well in the brief light rain we had the last morning.
I sealed the seams with a thinned out mix of Silnet, and added six beads of uncut Silnet across the floor to eliminate sliding.
Over all, I am really quite happy with my purchase. The design/feature set is well thought out and skillfully assembled. It is a quality made product and so far has exceeded my expectations. I look forward to using it in the Cranberry Wilderness, WV this October.
Dan
Jul 27, 2010 at 8:31 pm #1632832I've found the Easton Stakes easy to bend as well. However, they only seem to bend severely if they aren't in the ground all the way. From the picture in the article where the stake is visible it looks like the author didn't have it buried to the nail head.
Miraculously the heads haven't popped off of mine yet.
Jul 27, 2010 at 9:53 pm #1632846I've found very few places where there aren't either roots or rocks preventing at least a couple of the stakes from going in all the way.
I've started using MSR Groundhogs for the center front and back guylines on my Squall Classic and Rainshadow tents, those being the two that are under the most tension. Even if not in all the way, they hold a lot better. For the rest I use the Ti shepherds hook which hold just fine.
Jul 27, 2010 at 10:24 pm #1632850I haven't tried the Moment and will not as it has the same problem as my current Contrail…………..condensation. I love the Contrail but hate the condensation which despite all the recommended methods persists in 99% of occasions I use it.
I'm stii waiting for the holy grail…….an ultralight 4 season tent with no condensation problems…..it still doesn't exist!!Jul 27, 2010 at 11:45 pm #1632857"I've found the Easton Stakes easy to bend as well. However, they only seem to bend severely if they aren't in the ground all the way. From the picture in the article where the stake is visible it looks like the author didn't have it buried to the nail head.
Miraculously the heads haven't popped off of mine yet."
The heads have popped off both of the Easton stakes supplied with my Tarptent Moment. 100% failure rate. I have switched to MSR Ground Hogs, which have had a 0% failure rate (so far).
Jul 28, 2010 at 12:05 am #1632858"I also thought that there is a solid covering you can zip up on the two ends, to enclose them in case of really bad weather."
Yes, there are triangular flaps that completely close the ends of the Moment tent. They are connected to one side of the tent and tie back to open the tent's ends, or secure to the far side of the tent with a hook-and-loop fastener to close off the tent's ends.
Here is a picture of my Tarptent Moment's interior. You can see the rolled-up triangular end-flap on the left side of the triangular opening.
Here is a picture of my Tarptent Moment with the optional lengthwise center-line pole and the triangular door closed.
"The thing I like best about single-wall tents is that you can set them up in rain without getting the inside of the tent soaked, as you would with a double-wall tent."
I confirm that the Tarptent Moment tent can be set up in a pounding downpour without the inside of the tent getting wet. I got completely soaked, but the inside of the tent remained completely dry. The way Henry Shires has designed the Moment's door, you can get into the tent without having your gear inside the tent get wet.
"Are there guy-out points on the tent so that it would withstand wind a little better?"
There are two additional standard factory-supplied guy-out loops located part of the way up the central pole's sleeve. You can see them as black loops on the yellow pole sleeve in pictures of the Tarptent. These lateral guy lines run in the same vertical plain as the central support pole (hoop). I consider the Moment to be a four-stake tent as supplied from the factory, with the two end stakes (mentioned in the review) and the two lateral guys. I find that the two lateral guy lines significantly steady the Moment in gusty winds. (Of course in still conditions just the two end stakes would certainly suffice.)
When I ordered my Moment tent I asked Henry Shires if he would please add four more guy-out loops to my tent, one to each of the centers of the four long sides of the tent. He did so. When the wind is really gusting I pull the rear side of the tent all the way down to the ground and then I put two more stakes into the upwind sides of the tent. (I tend to pitch my tent so the door side is downwind, but I'm open to suggestions as I am a Tarptent Moment tent newbie.) Just so my arithmetic is clear, my modified-at-the-factory Moment has a total of 8 guy-line attachment points: 2 at the ends; 2 from the central pole's sleeve; and four on the centers of each long side. Technically that is 6 stake points (2 ends, 4 sides) and 2 guy-line points (on the sleeve of the supporting pole). At this time I am using MSR Ground Hogs for all of my stakes. That may be overkill. It may be sufficient to use titanium shepherd hooks for the four sides.
This particular added loop is on the center of the bottom of the door.
Jul 28, 2010 at 6:35 am #1632879Great review, very informative and excellent photos to illustrate what you're talking about. I looked at the Moment when searching for a replacement ultralight shelter but ended up with Henry's Rainbow instead. It's only 6 more ounces but almost twice the interior space at 30 sq ft. I can sit up in it with plenty of head room and space enough inside for me and all my gear. No condensation problems either even here in the southern Appalachians.
Jul 28, 2010 at 7:03 am #1632883I find this review a bit confusing. I'm not sure why the tent is compared to the BD First Light. The BD First Light uses waterproof, breathable material (Epic). This is an apples/oranges comparison. You may as well compare this tent to a double walled shelter.
Since condensation seemed to be the biggest issue, a better comparison would be with the latest Contrail. It isn't clear what steps were taken to minimize condensation. Did the author open the doors fully? Did he open the screen netting? If so, how did he deal with drafts and bugs? How did the efforts to minimize condensation (as just suggested) compare with the Contrail? If the author wrote something like "unlike the Contrail, when I opened the door to get better ventilation, the wind blew right on my face" or "unlike the Contrail, I couldn't get enough venting without opening the screen door" then I would find this review more helpful.
It also isn't clear to me, from the picture, how much room exists above the head, when the backpacker lies down. This too could add to condensation (breathing contributes quite a bit of condensation, so if the walls are close to the head, your may get a lot).
One more thing: It seems like most reviews that talk about storm worthiness just speculate. I can understand this, as who knows when a storm will occur. However, I can easily see how this can be tested (assuming you don't mind hurting your tent). Place a board on the top part of the bed of a pickup truck. Put the tent on top. Drive down a remote highway (with someone else behind a ways, with their hazards on) and see what happens. If a tent can withstand 40 MPH winds, it is pretty good (in my opinion). You could even put the tent on a rotating platter, thus mimicking swirling winds. If you are afraid of the state patrol, there are probably some closed tracks (for amateur racing) that could possibly be rented.
Jul 28, 2010 at 7:06 am #1632884No photos of the Moment under 3 feet of wet snow, like the BPL review of the Akto (a few years ago)?
Jul 28, 2010 at 8:30 am #1632905"It also isn't clear to me, from the picture, how much room exists above the head, when the backpacker lies down. This too could add to condensation (breathing contributes quite a bit of condensation, so if the walls are close to the head, your may get a lot)."
Exactly.
Isn't Henry coming out with a condensation 'curtain' for the Moment? If it covers the head area it should work really well.
Jul 28, 2010 at 10:57 am #1632942I personally own both Contrail and Moment and I must admit that some conclusions of this review do not correspond to what I experienced with the Moment.
After 15 nights in the Moment in various weather conditions, I do not consider condensation as a particular issue (not worse that the Contrail). I agree with Ross that appropriate actions must be taken in order to minimize condensation. In addition it takes some time to become familiar with a new tent; 15 nights is more than 5 but probably not enough neither to consolidate the conclusions about condensation. My actual observation is that condensation can be limited to similar levels in both Contrail and Moment.
Concerning wind, it is worth to remind that additional support to the canopy can be provided using a guy-line and a walking pole as explained in the Moment instruction sheet and illustrated as below. This come in addition to lateral guy-line when needed, depending on the wind direction.
check also my video of the Moment under moderate wind. Additional guy-line are present but without walking pole.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCMq8BtiZhUJul 28, 2010 at 11:38 am #1632957"No photos of the Moment under 3 feet of wet snow, like the BPL review of the Akto (a few years ago)?"
There are two pictures of the Tarptent Moment tent under heavy snow load in this BPL thread:
Jul 28, 2010 at 11:41 am #1632959"Isn't Henry coming out with a condensation 'curtain' for the Moment?"
Yes, Henry has told me via e-mail. He said it would be very much like the liner for the Rainbow:
http://www.tarptent.com/doublerainbowliner.html
I believe Franco has posted a picture of the liner for the Moment tent elsewhere.
I would really have liked to see the new condensation liner included in this BPL review of the Tarptent Moment tent. :-(
Jul 28, 2010 at 12:33 pm #1632975"The thing I like best about single-wall tents is that you can set them up in rain without getting the inside of the tent soaked, as you would with a double-wall tent."
Not always. The Scarp pitches almost exactly the same way as the Moment, the only difference is the number of stakes that you need to nail down in the process. You CAN separate the inner and outer walls, but if you don't, they pitch as one unit, so the fly keeps the interior dry even if it's raining when you pitch it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.