Topic
Canister Fuel Ratios
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Canister Fuel Ratios
- This topic has 25 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by David Thomas.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Nov 9, 2009 at 6:14 pm #1241552
I've researched various brand canister fuel ratios and have managed to come up with the following ((butane, isobutane, propane)
Primus – 70%,10%,20%
MSR – 0%,80%,20%
Coleman – 60%,0%,40%
Brunton/Kovea – 0%,70%,30%
SnowPeak – 0%,65%,35%
Jetboil – ?,?,?For the first 4 listed, I'm reasonably sure I've got the ratios correct (which means I've been able to confirm from multiple sources). However for Snowpeak I've seen different ratios claimed, and I can't find any info on the Jetboil canisters. Anybody know these ratios definitively?
Anybody care to share what their experiences are with regards to the lowest temps that they have used various brands of canisters down to (and still gotten good results)? I'm looking for inverted use especially. Thanks!
Nov 10, 2009 at 8:34 am #1544248I've got no info to offer, but do have a question: theoretically/practically, what ratio would go down to the lowest temps? I'm not familiar enough with the effect of different blends to know what a best ratio might be. But I'd love to see the results of this thread as winter rolls in and I'm still using a canister stove for most of my trips.
Nov 10, 2009 at 1:36 pm #1544319Hi Mark,
According to the MSDS Coleman Max fuel is 65% n. Butane 35% Propane
http://www.coleman.com/coleman/msds/peak1.pdf
The Kovea 450g canisters have 75% butane 25% propane ratio
Tony
Nov 11, 2009 at 9:59 am #1544560Tony,
Thanks for the information.Tim,
Since propane boils at a lower temperature, the more propane there is in the mix, the better cold weather performance. However I believe that propane also requires more pressure and thus needs a more heavy duty canister which is why 100% propane comes in thick steel canister (think Coleman here). I may have that wrong…Isobutane boils lower than N-butane so it would seem the best mix would be Isobutane and propane. What the optimum is I don't know. Coleman Powermax seems to be the best fuel but those only fit the Coleman Xpert and Xtreme stoves (now out of production).
Feb 24, 2010 at 9:47 pm #1578329Their customer service was good enough to inform me that the gold canisters are 85% isobutane, 15% propane. Avoid their silver canisters.
Feb 25, 2010 at 1:20 am #1578357Well I can tell you that the fuel ratio varies in different parts of the world. Here in Euroland, we have
Coleman – 70%, 0%, 30%
Primus – 50%, 25%, 25%Here is a graph I made which shows the boiling point (C) of 3 different mixtures (Coleman and Primus as above, and a hypothetical 20% propane, 80% i-butane) when the canister is used UPRIGHT. This shows how the boiling point rises as the propane is used up first. Remember, boiling point is the temp at which the total vapour pressure matches sea-level atmospheric pressure; the canister needs to be at least 5C above the boiling point for there to be sufficient pressure to operate the stove.
When the canister is used INVERTED, the propane/butane mix does not change and so the boiling point remains constant at the value on the temp axis. In this case, all three mixtures are almost identical!
Feb 25, 2010 at 2:14 am #1578360Actually, as far as I can see, the fuel mixes sold by the different companies vary from year to year and country to country. Most confusing. Anyhow, the limiting factor is the pressure inside the canister at 50 C (DOT regulations). Some examples are as follows.
.
This needs some explanation of course. First of all, the compositions shown here may have changed over the years. Second, the pressures are absolute, and you will only get gas out while the pressure exceeds 1 atmosphere – the dashed line. Third, what's currently available in America may differ from what is available in Australia.
The pure propane has too much pressure for the conventional screw-thread canister. But Coleman do sell a stronger steel canister with a different fitting. If you want to go pulking at -40 C, that's the way to go.
The Kovea 70% isobutane / 30% propane curve overlays the Powermax 60% butane 40% propane curve. These were the best performing brands available in Australia at the time. Both are pushing the pressure limit for the canisters.
The MSR 80% iso-butane / 20% propane overlays the Snow Peak mixture – which may have changed. I suspect the Coleman 70% n-butane / 30 $% propane matches (is under) these two as well.
Any other mixes will be below the performance of the Powermax, regardless of the mix.
Pure iso-butane and pure butane are also shown. They are a bit feeble!
All of which means the best you can expect from a canister at ambient is operation down to -25 C. Ah, but we have so many ways to cheat that! :-)
cheers
Feb 25, 2010 at 3:59 am #1578363Hi Roger
Your graph shows more mixtures than mine, but it is still reassuring to find some common data points:
Both graphs show the boiling point of 70/30 Coleman and MSR 80/20 IsoPro to be close to -25C
The boiling point stays more or less constant if the canister is used inverted (you know that :-) my graph attempts to explain what happens when the canister is used upright. It took a bit of effort with a spreadsheet to work this out.cheers
Nov 11, 2011 at 8:23 pm #1800957I just took a look at the Cascade Designs (MSR) and Snow Peak web sites (see below). It does look like Snow Peak has changed their blend.
HJ
Per SnowPeak:
Specifications
Material – 15% Propane / 85% Iso-Butane Mixture
Dimensions – D 3.25" H 2.5"
Fuel Type – Gas Canister
Combustion Type – Vapor Burning
Made In – JAPAN
Weight – 6.4oz (110g)Per MSR
This premium fuel, an 80/20 blend of isobutane and propane, boosts the performance of canister stoves. It outperforms standard butane/propane mixtures and burns clean to reduce soot and clogs.
Improved Performance: 80/20 blend of isobutane and propane delivers superior performance throughout the life of the canister and in colder temperatures.
Clean-Burning: Optimal fuel blend results in reduced soot and clogs.
Recyclable: Canisters can be recycled. Consult your local recycling center for regulations.
Made in KoreaNov 11, 2011 at 8:52 pm #1800964"Weight – 6.4oz (110g)"
Well, 6.4oz does not equal 110g in weight. So, I thought maybe they meant 6.4oz (gross weight) for 110g (net weight), but 6.4oz seems on the light side. Maybe it is 6.4 fluid ounces.
–B.G.–
Nov 12, 2011 at 4:18 am #1800994>> Anybody care to share what their experiences are with regards to the lowest temps that they have used various brands of canisters down to (and still gotten good results)? I'm looking for inverted use especially. Thanks!
My son and I just took a two day trip where temps in the evening and morning were a steady 35F. We were using a Snowpeak Litemax stove with a MSR pancake canister and a Snowpeak gold mini. The MSR failed everytime after about 90 secs. The only way I could get it to perform was to wrap it in a fleece and put it in my foot box during sleep each night. The Snowpeak worked everytime we whipped it out.
I could have gotten a bum MSR canister, but that was our experience with the two at 2500ft, 35F, and using a Litemax.
Nov 12, 2011 at 8:25 pm #1801191Hunh. That's weird. Were they both fresh canisters?
Nov 13, 2011 at 4:26 am #1801226Actually the Snowpeak was older than the MSR. I'm going to do some testing on my deck this week. I have another MSR canister to use with the other two and try to find out what was up with the situation.
Nov 13, 2011 at 7:41 am #1801243Let us know what you come up with. That's really weird that MSR gas would flop while Snow Peak would shine. MSR should be slightly better in cold weather, just judging by their advertised fuel ratios.
Nov 13, 2011 at 9:19 am #1801265I wonder if it could be down to differences in the dimensions of the canister fitting – the flange and the Lindal valve, such that in the case of the MSR canister the pin on the stove is not fully opening the Lindal valve.
This can also happen with the MSR Pocket Rocket when that big rubber washer goes hard in the cold.
Nov 13, 2011 at 4:54 pm #1801421Hi, Stuart,
Good thought. I had an Optimus Crux that inexplicably died part way into a boil. I tightened up the canister, and it was fine.
Dec 23, 2017 at 12:57 am #3508884I didnt want to start a new thread so I dug up an old one. (B.G.!!)
anyway…
I just saw the Camp Chef Stryker Stove for 100% propane. ( jetboil for propane)
Any reason for this? Steel bottle so heavy that benefits are outweighed?
Dec 23, 2017 at 5:53 am #3508924That heavy steel bottle can be refilled.
Bit unstable though: tall.Cheers
Dec 23, 2017 at 8:44 am #3508931Everything can be refilled. Â Butane-mix canisters can be refilled from larger canisters for some cost savings. Â 16-ounce propane cylinders can be refilled VERY inexpensively from bulk (BBQ) propane tanks – about $0.70 per refill in my town. Â Versus $8-9 for a 450-gram butane canister (same BTUs) or $20 for four 110-gram canisters (same BTUs). Â Now, those propane cylinders aren’t supposed to be transported across state lines if refilled, but I live in a large state. Â Keep in mind that there are lots of safety issues to be aware in any refilling.
As to the point of that “propane JetBoil”? Â Great cold-weather performance, moderate price fuel without refilling and very cheap with refilling. Â So if you are more price-sensitive and go out below -20F a lot, and aren’t weight sensitive (car camping, horse packing, sledding out for ice fishing, snowmobiling, etc) it seems like an intriguing option.
But for backpacking? Â Nope. Â Learn to refill from larger butane canisters (or cheaper n-butane canisters) to save money and learn to use a Moulder Strip for sub-0F use.
Dec 23, 2017 at 11:23 am #3508934Hi David
Not quite what I meant. You cannot legally refill the canisters we use – even if so many of us do. They are strictly single-use. But you can take a steel propane cylinder to the nearest gas dealer and have it refilled with propane or LPG. Well – you can in Australia anyhow.
The difference is to be found in the connection. The Lindal valve in our canisters has an absolutely crappy half-formed thread in sheet steel (which rusts), while the propane cylinder has a proper threaded-brass connector.
Cheers
Dec 23, 2017 at 2:01 pm #3508941Not sure how applicable this is to the rest of the world but in Japan the parent company of Soto sells this Lindal valve canister for their brazing/welding/kitchen torches. Certainly not lightweight at 410g yielding 220g of 57/43 butane/propane. Cheap though.
Dec 23, 2017 at 5:57 pm #3508967I just cant think of a situation where I’d need straight propane, but only want a jetboil style vessel. Plus the weight of the bottle throws it all on its head.
When dog mushers only have a 10 minute coffee break? Maybe ski patrollers on snow machines?
Dec 23, 2017 at 8:14 pm #3509022Propane boiling point is -44 F. Straight propane would be good as you get close to that temperature.
I think I will avoid such temperatures myself : )
Dec 23, 2017 at 11:17 pm #3509048Cook you up some noodles on top of Mt Everest dudes.
Dec 24, 2017 at 3:57 am #3509135If it was April 1st, I’d post about a 4 ounce, 115-gram aluminum propane tank. Â Only $13.99. Â And it really is available (but there’s one catch).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.