Topic
Which option is lighter?
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › General Forums › Food, Hydration, and Nutrition › Which option is lighter?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Feb 26, 2006 at 3:04 pm #1217879
Which one of these options would be lighter for a weekend outing: carrying freeze-dried food packs with a stove, fuel, lighter, eating utensil & a pot or leaving the cooking gear at home & carrying non-freeze-dried foods like granola bars, gorp, etc.?
Feb 26, 2006 at 3:11 pm #1351358it really depends on what kind of cooking gear you use
if you use a sterno can cook pot with aluminum foil lid, and use rocks for a potstand for your esbit, your cooking system would be less than an ounce including fuel for a weekend trip.
but a typical alcohol stove system with Ti pot, can be closer to 7 or 8 oz with fuel.
It dosent make much difference on weekends. because you are not carrying much food
but I think with a light esbit or alcohol stove system, you could go lighter. and your food would probably taste better
unless you are cooking no cook oats in a plastic bag for breakfast and dinner. then you could go lighter with no stove
Feb 26, 2006 at 4:55 pm #1351364For a weekend, all things considered, you’ll probably save a bit of weight by not cooking. But you’ll also probably be surprised how little weight you’d save.
As has been pointed out, an esbit stove and adequate fuel and small cookpot only weight a few ounces. Assuming your food weight for no-cook food menu is equal to the cooked food menu you’ll probably end up in about the same place.
But it can get tricky. For some no-cook food (tabouli, some no-cook oats) a lot of sitting time can be required. If you are on the move you’ll need to have a secure container to keep the soaking food in. A ziploc might work, and might also produce a spectacular mess instead of supper.
One of the things to be really careful about is that food-value-to-weight ratios tend to matter a lot more than the weight of cooking equipment. It is really easy to construct a no-cook diet that involves carrying more weight per day than a plausible diet with a cooked dinner and cold cereal for breakfast.
I do some no-cook meals, usually tabouli or sometimes just have a big sandwich for dinner the first night out. In general, I don’t see a big advantage (or disadvantage) to not cooking. It is more about psychology. Having a warm bowl of chow at the end of a long, rainy day, may not have any physiological benefit at all, but it can have enormous psychological benefit. Coffee and tea have no real food value but can have an enormous impact on your morale.
Remember, this is about having fun. Just do what is fun for you.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.