Topic
Help me configure my Nunatak bag!
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Help me configure my Nunatak bag!
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Aug 17, 2005 at 6:57 pm #1216641
It’s finally time for me to get my fancy schmancy Arc, just in time for the fall/winter/spring Texas backpacking and bikepacking season! I think the correct bag for me would be the 32deg F Ghost. I’m a somewhat cold sleeper, so I anticipate that I should either expect it to not perform comfortably (clothed) down to 32 or I should ask for some modifications. I sleep under a poncho tarp with a somewhat breathable bivy and haven’t had soaking issues yet with my current non-DWR bag.
Should I get Pertex Quantum (0.9 oz/yd, light, soft) or should I get the Microlight(1.3 oz/yd, soft, durable)? I’m not familiar with Microlight so I could use some input and comparisons. Also, which custom choices should I consider? I see that Ryan J’s choice was for tighter baffles and extra foot fill (I think). What do you think?
Aug 17, 2005 at 7:51 pm #1340491Kit,
You may want to read about the Nunatak Arc Ghost in the Rock and Ice article:
Rich
Aug 17, 2005 at 9:52 pm #1340494I believe that all the Nunatak bags use smaller baffles than the used to (5″ rather than the old 10″). I found my bag (with a warm hat and a light base layer) to be mostly comfortable to 35F. I would characterize myself as a normal sleeper. The “mostly comfortable” is that during the night the down shifted resulting in some cold spots. If I was going to custom order a new Ghost I would most likely ask a couple of ounces of overfill around my hips and chest. I found the foot pocket plenty warm.
As to material. I have .9 material. It’s worked ok, but it would be nice if it was a bit more warm repellent. I might go with microlight if I did it over again… or I might still which the .9 … I am not really sure.
–mark
Aug 18, 2005 at 9:10 am #1340510I’ve got the Arc Ghost in microlight outer shell with the 0.85 inner. I had Tom trim the length of the bag to fit my 67″ stature and it weighs in at 15.25 oz.
Had the bag been offered in Quantum last year I probably would’ve spec’d it for the outer shell but microlight (while a tad heavier than Quantum) is more durable.
I found the fill weight to be perfect to -2 C for me. I think the trick with keeping warm without overfill is to custom size the bag for yourself so that dead spaces are minimized when you cinch the straps down. If its really cold I sleep with a psolar balaclava and that really boosts the core heat retention.Aug 18, 2005 at 7:22 pm #1340540One way to save weight and make the bag perform better (especially low temps) is to narrow the foot box and bring the fully enclosed part higher up your legs (mine goes nearly to the knees). I got the .85 with DWR coating and have had water (dew–my 4 year old son loves to sleep outside without a tent) pool on the surface with little penetration inside. Is shook off pretty well. You’ve got the weights mixed on the Pertex and Quantum.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Garage Grown Gear 2024 Holiday Sale Nov 25 to Dec 2:
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.