Topic
cashmere vs patagonia micropuff
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › cashmere vs patagonia micropuff
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Aug 15, 2005 at 9:14 am #1216620
Any opinions on how Patagonia’s micropuff pullover (sweater) performs vs. a medium weight cashmere sweater with a rainjacket?
I’ve only used cashmere before, it’s kept me pretty warm but I’m considering the Patagonia because so many are using them and, actually, I own one already (that I’ve never used–it’s pretty but I keep going for the cashmere, esp. in VT winters).
The patagonia is 2 oz heavier and not quite as compressible–what advantages have people seen compared to wool? I’m willing to take the leap if there’s been good luck with it so far.Aug 15, 2005 at 10:01 am #1340374My first answer is that the micro puff will be significantly warmer for the weight. I can’t compare our cashmere sweaters. Mine sweater is 10.5oz for size L (only 1 oz lighter than my micro puff). I would characterize it as a light sweater. My really warm sweaters are more like 15oz with a slightly more “open” knit (Icelandic).. and a lot more scratchy :-(
Anyway… My 10.5oz sweater packs to around 2/3s the size of the micropuff when fully compressed (1/2 the size compared to how much I am willing to compress the micropuff). But it no where near as warm. The sweater + jacket + hat + gloves adds around 30F of comfort for me. So if I am wearing something that I would be comfortable just sitting around in at 65F, then adding a sweater and shell is good down to around 35F. If I am active, then that combo takes me down to around 20F.
The Micropuff + hat + gloves (assuming some leg protection) adds 50F (conservative) of comfort for me… e.g. I am toasty just sitting around 15F, and comfort when active down to below zero.
Of course this isn’t really an apples to apples comparision. If I factor in the weight of the rainshell, the micropuff is hugely more warm / weight.
Aug 15, 2005 at 8:50 pm #1340404Thanks Mark,
you just made packing a whole lot easier–I was worried about the micropuff warmth when wet factor, but sounds like that’s not a problem then–I’d trade sentimentality for more warmth anyday!Aug 15, 2005 at 9:02 pm #1340405If the cashmere or the micro puff is wet then the lowest comfortable temp goes up. But I wouldn’t expect that to be a big issue. If you are in conditions that might have real rain, I expect you would bring a hardshell which could be layered over the micro puff. When I use the micro puff I don’t have to worry about rain.. just snow :-)
The micropuff does a reasonable job when it’s wet (not absorbing huge amounts of water and drying out with body heat)… but it’s total insulation value is compromised… better than many materials, but it would be impacted.
–Mark
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Garage Grown Gear 2024 Holiday Sale Nov 25 to Dec 2:
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.