|
||
|
Presented with support from Helly Hansen  |
||
|
|
||
The future of WPB fabric tech: a systems approach for materials, DWR, and garment design. Photo: My winter thru-hike of the Wonderland Trail, clothed in eVENT, still miserably wet (but weirdly happy for the experience!) When eVENT was launched in 1999, it opened the floodgates for the evolution of waterproof-breathable membrane technology, eventually leading to the widespread adoption of expanded PTFE membranes that dramatically improved both breathability and user comfort. Waterproof-breathable rainwear is a mature product category in the outdoor industry - with a nagging, unresolved materials problem. The membrane receives most of the attention because it is the apparent site of the contradiction: liquid water must be excluded while water vapor is allowed to pass. In practice, however, field performance is often governed by the surrounding textile system. The face fabric, surface treatment, backer, seam construction, garment architecture, contamination state, and mechanical wear all influence whether a shell continues to perform under sustained precipitation and exertion. The most consequential failure mode is not always membrane leakage, but the loss of functional water repellency at the exterior surface. When the face fabric wets out, the laminate changes state. The garment gains water mass, and conductive and evaporative heat losses increase, while the vapor-pressure gradient across the fabric system is reduced. At this point, internal condensation becomes more likely. The wearer may experience the garment as wet from the inside even when hydrostatic resistance (resistance to penetration by outside precipitation) remains intact. In this condition, a shell can satisfy a laboratory definition of waterproofness while failing to provide acceptable comfort while hiking. Durable water repellency was developed to preserve the operating requirements of the laminate. Its function is not to waterproof the membrane, but to prevent saturation of the textile surface, so the membrane can continue to perform within its intended moisture-transport regime. For several decades, the most durable and broadly effective water-repellent finishes used fluorinated chemistry. Their value came from a combination of low surface energy, resistance to wetting, and resistance to contamination by oils and soils. Their liability is persistence. PFAS compounds are now understood as long-lived environmental contaminants, and regulatory pressure has made their reduction a design constraint rather than a discretionary sustainability claim. EPA frames the category problem like this: PFAS are widely used, long-lasting chemicals that break down slowly; they are found in water, air, fish, soil, and biological samples; and exposure to some PFAS has been linked to harmful health effects. The transition away from fluorinated DWR is therefore not a simple substitution. A replacement finish, fiber system, or fabric construction must retain water repellency after abrasion, laundering, compression, contamination, and repeated flexing. It must do so without imposing unacceptable penalties in vapor transport, garment weight, textile hand, manufacturability, service life, or garment maintenance burden. A lower-persistence chemistry that fails early merely transfers the cost from chemistry to performance, maintenance, or replacement. This is why the most important work in rainwear may now be occurring outside the membrane. Further gains in breathability are still beneficial, particularly during uphill travel and high metabolic output in dry (cold and windy) environments. But breathability, by itself, is an incomplete performance endpoint. A highly permeable system that loses exterior repellency under sustained rain will still accumulate moisture, chill the wearer, and reduce comfort. Conversely, a more durable exterior water-shedding system may preserve practical performance even when laboratory breathability values are not that great. Weight follows the same logic. A lighter shell has real value because the weight remaining in the backpack when the rain gear isn't needed is dead weight. But weight reduction is not intrinsically progressive from a wet-weather performance standpoint. Below some threshold, reductions in textile mass may compromise tear strength, abrasion resistance under pack straps, seam durability, zipper reliability, face-fabric stability, hydrostatic head resistance, and the persistence of water repellency. We'd love to believe that the relevant design problem is maximum waterproofness, maximum breathability, minimum weight, or PFAS elimination, but none of these can be considered in isolation. Instead, it is the optimization of competing constraints: hydrostatic resistance, vapor transport, exterior wet-out resistance, repellency durability, abrasion tolerance, garment reliability, packability, care requirements, and chemical responsibility. That is the direction we are heading with the waterproof-breathable rainwear category as we enter a post-PFAS era. No longer are we interested in new singular performance claims (like maximum breathability), but a more demanding definition of performance: a shell that remains meaningfully protective after rain, exertion, contamination, abrasion, laundering, compression, and time. That's just the fabric story! Don't forget about garment design when you're facing heavy, sustained precipitation in the backcountry. I explored this concept further in Why You Should Spend a Few Ounces of Pack Weight on Rainwear Ventilation Features.
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
Also this weekNew! Email newsletter archives > browse our recent email newsletters. |
||
|
Originally sent as a Backpacking Light email newsletter. Subscribe to the Backpacking Light newsletter | Affiliate disclosure |
