Introduction
The Xero Shoes Terraflex should interest both trail runners and ultralight hikers looking for a true minimalist shoe option for rugged terrain.
A super-flexible sole and “zero drop” between heel and toe will satisfy those looking for a natural, quasi-barefoot experience where the foot is free to move and flex and form is not compromised by excessive structure or support. The sole contains just enough cushion to shield the foot from rocks, while offering very good traction. It’s a great choice when rocky terrain or long distances would make barefoot or more extreme minimalist options too slow or painful, or otherwise impractical.
As a caveat to those who have been wearing conventional footwear with elevated heels and other forms of support, you may discover, like me, that you love the more natural experience of minimalist footwear, but make sure to transition slowly so that you don’t overwhelm muscles and tendons that aren’t used to the experience.
Features and Specifications
- Men’s size 9 advertised at 9.6 ounces (my size 12 without the insoles weighed in at ~9 ounces according to our kitchen scale)
- Includes 2 mm removable insoles
- Contains 3 mm of foam cushion (mid-sole)
- 4 mm (height) lugs on the sole
- Sole are backed by a 5,000-mile warranty
- Zero drop, meaning there’s no elevated heel
- Wide toebox

Review Context
For ultralight backcountry travel, the hiker, trail runner, or fast-packer might want to consider the following performance criteria:
- Lowest possible weight, to prevent fatigue
- Good traction on slippery surfaces, like wet rocks, loose dirt, dry leaves, or mud
- Protection from rocks and other sharp objects
- Dries quickly so you don’t walk around with wet feet all day
- Flexible sole and wide toebox, allowing the foot to work naturally
Description of Field Testing
When the Terraflex shoes arrived, I started out by wearing them around town, just to see what they felt like on sidewalks and in the house. I took them out for a run on a path which is a mix of dirt, clay, and grit, and tested them with some short hikes on- and off-trail in order to evaluate traction and comfort on steep slopes, sticky mud, rocky paths, and forest floors covered in dry leaves and abundant deadfall.
Given the heavy snowfall we’ve experienced this winter, I ended up wearing them on several hikes with snowshoes, including an overnighter with a heavy pack. Given conditions and timing, I haven’t had a chance to wear them on a long trail run, but have made some judgments from my experience wearing similar minimalist shoes during ultra-distance trail races and multi-day FKT attempts, such as thru-running New York’s 350-mile Long Path.

Performance Assessment
My assessment of the Terraflex covered the following criteria:
- Comfort
- Protection
- Natural fit
- Traction
Comfort
I found these shoes very comfortable. The materials on the inside of the shoe feel soft, and my feet were fine without socks.
As someone who who rarely wears boots, even in the winter, I found the Terraflex kept my feet warm during the overnight snowshoe hike, where conditions were moderately cold (mid-20 F’s) with 2+ feet of snow. Snow shoes and hiking crampons both strap on securely to the shoes, without discomfort. (However, I’m generally not as happy wearing micro-spikes on trail-running shoes, because the elastic straps are either too tight and put a lot of pressure on my toes, or they’re too loose, and the spikes fall off.)
The tread consists of moderately aggressive lugs (4 mm height), but the ride was still very smooth even when walking and running on hard surfaces. I used to wear the INOV-8 X-talons, which have more prominent 8 mm lugs, which were great for mud, but on pavement I could feel those lugs pressing up into my feet, which was a little awkward (felt like driving over a rumble strip). That’s not the case with the Terraflex.
Protection
During the testing, I felt the Terraflex afforded very good protection against rocks, certainly much more than I get when wearing Vibram Five Fingers, and comparable to the INOV-8 Trailroc’s I used to wear (before they stopped offering zero-drop). Based on my experience with the INOV-8s, I’d expect the Terraflex to perform admirably during long trail runs, including ultras.
As a caveat, a little more protection means a little less sensation of the ground. That’s an unavoidable trade-off.
Natural Fit
As someone who has been running in ultra-minimalist shoes for several years and now runs and hikes barefoot, too, I have no tolerance for shoes with unnecessary restrictions. The Terraflex is a great fit for me: snug overall, cinches down tightly over the instep to prevent the foot slipping back and forth, and plenty of room in the toe box for the toes to splay and wiggle. As noted above, the shoes are “zero drop,” meaning no elevated heel, and there’s no arch support.
An important test of a minimalist shoe is the ability of the sole to twist and flex, because that’s the quality that allows the foot to feel and conform to the ground and stretch and move naturally. You can easily crumple the Terraflex into a ball, or squeeze or twist the sole.


The company’s website advises that the Terraflex runs a little small, and indeed, I found size 12 on the tight side, even though for most other brands I normally wear 11.5. It may be that Xero Shoes run a little smaller than other brands, or that there is some variability in the manufacturing process. In any case, the company has a free exchange program, and the customer service department was very responsive when I needed to swap out sizes.
Traction
Traction is hard to measure objectively, but when your foot slips out on a slimy rock, that sure gets your attention!
Based on my testing, I’d describe the Terraflex’s traction as very good.
The treads consist of V-shaped lugs which are 4 mm in height. There’s a trade-off in lug height: the taller the lugs, the deeper you can bite into loose surfaces, like sand, dirt and mud – but tall lugs tend to reduce the total area in contact with a flat surface, like the face of the rock, where your ideal traction would come from the slick rubber tread of a rock-climbing shoe.
For conditions in upstate New York, the biggest traction concerns in my experience are scrambling over sandstone ledges and running through layers of dried leaves. While we have our share of muddy patches, we don’t typically see long stretches of soft dirt. For these conditions, the Terraflex lugs seem pretty optimal, and I think they’d perform really well in some of our local Hudson Valley races like the Escarpment Trail Run, Manitou’s Revenge, or the SRT Run/Hike.
Based on my experience running out west, I think they’d be great on sandy, gravelly, and rocky terrain, too. If I were going to go run Leadville again, or climb to the top of Mt. Whitney, I’d wear the Terraflex.

Product Strengths and Limitations
Based on my testing, I’d expect the Terraflex to be a strong contender in the field of minimalist trail-running shoes, thanks to the combination of comfortable natural fit, good traction, and protection against rocks and other rough surfaces.
One potential limitation I was not able to explore in my testing was the Terraflex’ performance in wet conditions. While I don’t mind wet feet for a day or two, over a protracted period wet conditions raise the risk of blisters, and shoes with soft uppers sometimes take a long time to dry. Should you wear Terraflex in rainforests, swamps, or monsoon conditions? I’m not sure.
I also don’t know how durable they’ll prove to be. However, the shoe comes with a 5,000-mile warranty on the sole, which is reassuring. (Xero Shoes didn’t hesitate to honor that warranty on a pair of Prio running shoes which I beat to pieces in the rocky Catskills.)
The biggest limitation to keep in mind is that for people who are not used to minimalist footwear, it’s wise to transition slowly. The zero drop feature and lack of any internal support are positives for minimalist runners and hikers used to moving naturally, but if you transition too quickly from conventional footwear, you could overwhelm muscles and tendons and risk injury.
Compared To….
- After a burst of popularity a few years ago, true minimalist running shoe sales have declined, and many of the major brands have backed away from the market. For example, INOV-8 no longer offers zero-drop shoes.
- According to an informal poll of barefoot and minimalist runners, another well-regarded zero-drop trail shoe would be the Merrell Trail Glove, which is slightly lighter at 7 ounces, offers 3 mm lugs, and is also designed to be worn sockless. Vivobarefoot’s Primus Trail is also cited as a favorite.
- Altra markets zero-drop trail running shoes, but because of the thicker soles, they are not regarded by everyone as truly minimalist. These might be an option for someone who wants more protection against rocky surfaces.
- Sandals represent another minimalist option. They’re great for summer running, and obviously not ideal for winter conditions (although some people have been known to wear them with toe-socks and microspikes). I’ve found they require very careful foot placement on steep and slanted surfaces, otherwise the straps can bite painfully into soft skin. That said, the winner in last year’s SRT Run/Hike’s 70-mile division (which follows a pretty rugged trail through the Shawangunk Mountains) wore sandals, so they’re worth considering for ultralight hiking as well as trail racing.
- Vibram Five Fingers offer a very natural experience, as the soles are light-weight and extremely flexible. I’ve used and enjoyed them on rocky trails and bushwhacking through the forest. For rougher surfaces, friends recommend the V-Trails.
Commentary
Now that spring has finally arrived in New York, I’m really looking forward to ditching the snowshoes, spikes, and heavy pack and getting back into ultralight mode, whether hiking or running. This may surprise some readers, but my first priority will be to drop shoes altogether and go barefoot, which for me is the most fun mode of experiencing the mountains.
Having said that, barefoot tends to be slow, especially on rocky trails, so on those hikes and runs where I have serious miles to cover (or when I want to keep up with fast-paced friends), the Terraflex is going to be my go-to shoe, as for me it’s exactly the right solution to the problem of sustaining a minimalist experience over long distances and rugged surfaces.
Provided that you’re used to a flexible zero drop shoe, I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend them for ultra-distance trail races and multi-day fastpack adventures.
Where to Buy the Xero Shoes Terraflex
- Xero Shoes Website (official manufacturer’s website)
Learn More About Minimalist and Lightweight Footwear (Related Content)
- Minimalist Footwear for Backpacking (Video), by Ryan Jordan
- Altra Lone Peak NeoShell Review, by Chase Jordan
- How to Keep Your Feet Warmer and Dryer When Backpacking in Wet Conditions with Lightweight Footwear, by Ryan Jordan
- Hiking-Worthy “Barefoot Shoes” (Forum Thread)
- Minimalist Shoes – Staff Picks
Disclosure
As part of this review and in the context of my affiliation as a Backpacking Light contributor, I received a complimentary pair of Terraflex shoes from Xero Shoes with no expectation or obligation to publish a review.
Some links in this review may be affiliate links, which means if you click on the link to this product and make a purchase at the retailer website, the retailer will contribute a portion of the sale to help support Backpacking Light. It doesn’t increase your cost, and it helps us maintain our site, fund content development, and grow member services! Thank you!

Discussion
Become a member to post in the forums.
Companion forum thread to: Xero TerraFlex Review
This Xero Terraflex review features shoes that should interest both trail runners and ultralight hikers looking for a true minimalist shoe option for rugged terrain: super-flexible sole, zero drop, some cushioning, and very good traction.
Looks promising. Thanks. I’ve been missing the old Inov-8 TrailRoc 235s.
Xero, if you’re reading, how about size 15s and up? And not run small.
I really liked the look of these when they cam out. I was letting my Merrel Trail Gloves wear out before I pulled the trigger on these but after a review on the durability after only 250 miles that I saw on Reddit a couple weeks ago, I’m tentative to commit.
Not my review, but I saw this over on the r/ultralight subreddit a couple weeks ago. Just a data point in terms of durability:
Xero TerraFlex 250 Mile Review
He has a 100 mile review as well on his channel. From Reddit, he said
Michael – thanks for the heads up on the durability review. I was hoping that the TerraFlex was a candidate for a thru-hiking shoe, but the review is very disappointing. Hopefully they will solve the durability issues in future iterations.
Can anyone recommend an alternative?
For longer and rougher walks I don’t see the Minimus or Trail Glove as serious options – vulnerable uppers and short-lived soles, in my experience. And pretty hopeless on steep grass and mud.
The midsole on the Lone Peak is far too high for me – I’d only use it as a last resort.
And Innov-8 have exited the minimalist market.
So I’ve mainly been using Vivos, despite their weaknesses. But many reviewers are saying that the new Primus Trail SG has finally solved the issues and is a well-rounded shoe. The lower price of the TerraFlex is a false economy if they only last 200-300 miles – I’ve always got more than that from the Vivos.
So I guess I’ll be trying the Vivos. But I’d be very grateful for any alternatives, particularly looking beyond the usual suspects.
@geoffcaplan Have you looked at the Altra King MT? They have less cushion and more aggressive tread than the Lone Peaks, but not as minimal as the Trail Glove.
Agree. VBF Primus SG probably bet bet for truly minimalist shoe. I’ve been curious about the King MT, but the still have a lot of cushion/stack height.
Not sure the King MT would be viable for thru-hiking. In addition to the offputting 2cm stack height, the lugs are so aggressive that road walking might be rather unpleasant. Looks more like a specialised fell running shoe to me, but I’m open to correction. Also, is it just me, or is that design egregiously ugly?
Another option (at least for Europeans) would be the new Joe Nimble Trail:
https://www.baer-shoes.com/nimbletoes-trail-1739
Has anyone tried them?
When you get over the sticker shock they may make sense. Just chatted with their UK sales rep, who turned out to be Lee Saxby’s wife. For anyone who doesn’t know, Lee is a highly reputed expert on natural running and walking mechanics. It seems that he was actively involved in the design of the shoe, and is very bullish about its benefits for long-distance runs and walks. They justify the cost by saying that they use a more ergonomic last that adds to production costs, and that it’s built using traditional cobblering, so it’s sewn rather than bonded and welded. This means that they can offer a free repair service, while the Vivo shoes aren’t repairable. It also seems to have a good rand – which in my experience makes a big difference to life expectancy. So it may be that added longevity will counterbalance the eye-watering price. But as there are no long-term reviews this would be a bit of a gamble.
Maybe worth mentioning in passing that Lee has come to the conclusion that long distance ventures require a bit more padding and protection – otherwise you run too high a risk of strain injury. And no-one is a greater advocate of minimal footwear than Lee. Nothing as extreme as the Lone Peak, but a happy medium.
Joe Nimble sell an innovative footbed for rocky terrain. It looked over the top to me, but apparently Lee likes it a lot and uses it personally. I’ve only heard good things about his knowledge, so I’m going to give them a try. I’d hate to be knocked off the trail with bruised soles, and walking for hours on jagged rocks in minimal shoes does begin to take it toll…
The Joe Nimble Trail has a 3mm removable footbed, so there is plenty of room to swap the rockplate in and out as required.
I’m tempted to experiment – but it sure is an intimidating price-point…
long distance ventures require a bit more padding and protection
Really?
We do 2 and 3 month long walking trips in the mountains in stock joggers, and have no problems.
It may depend on how long (years) you have been walking – how ‘tough’ your feet are.
Cheers
Hi Roger
I was talking about more padding relative to a hard-core minimal shoe like the Vivo Trail shoe, which has a thin sole and no mid-sole. I’ve done long alpine walks in this kind of minimal footwear, and my feet got a bit bruised. Not enough to spoil the trip, but enough to convince me that I need to be more pragmatic and compromise a bit.
Stock joggers would have considerably more padding than the solutions that Lee is recommending.
As I said, he’s recommending a half-way house between a fully minimal shoe and a standard trail shoe. With the present market, the best way to achieve this is probably to add protective inserts to an existing minimal shoe.
Obviously, this is for people who are fully transitioned. He’s addressing “barefoot” enthusiasts like himself, and suggesting that they shouldn’t be too gung-ho on longer projects.
Hi Geoff
You make a very good point there. Yes, I was talking about ‘standard’ joggers rather than something utterly minimalist.
The Australian Dunlop Volleys could be put in the minimalist category. They have fantastic grip in a wet canyon, and you can feel everything under them. We have tried them on a long trip, and they were ‘not optimal’.
I stand corrected.
Cheers
Geoff,
Is Merrell All Out Blaze Aero Sport an alternative? That is the best alternative I have found so far for Scandinavia I have found after giving up on poor durability of innov-8 and others. They may be well suited for England as well. After all,we normally have the same weather as you, just 2 days later. (It is a water sports shoe.)
</span>
Zero drop, good grip in most conditions, more protection, dries reasonably fast and, importantly, the mesh upper is reinforced for durabilty. The durabilaity seems ok or even good so far without testing it fully. Much better than the Innov-8´s I have experience from.
They are however still not ideal, the sole is a bit to stiff and rigid compared to what I really want. They could maybe be lighter.
Gunnar
Thanks for the suggestion. Attracted by the low cost and the 5mm lugs on a Vibram sole. And the weight doesn’t look too bad for a durable shoe – I guess that feather-light and durable is an unattainable ideal, with current materials at least.
But put off by the fact that it seems to offer “arch support”. In my experience, this is never positioned where my arch actually is. I’ve never understood why people feel that a healthy foot needs arch support. Still, I may give them a try.
Arch support can be utterly painful. It bruises the muscles under the foot.
Cheers
Forgot to mention the arch support. I don´t like it either, though in this case it seems to work OK for me.
I think I’m going to end up trying the Joe Nimble Trail shoe.
https://uk.joe-nimble.com/collections/mens/products/nimbletoes-trail-m-black-yellow
The price is pretty steep, but I’ve had a chat with a user who says they offer exceptional fit and are built like a Land Rover Defender, so should last significantly longer than the alternatives. They have an excellent rand, which is the real weak-spot of many lightweight trail shoes. And their traditional construction means that they can be repaired and even re-soled, in contrast to the throwaway construction of glued and welded shoes.
This guy also backed up Lee Saxby’s endorsement of the rather odd looking Flexitec footbed. He says it works very well, so you can have a true minimal shoe most of the time, and swap in the Flexitec when you need protection from rock without losing the benefits of low stack height and natural foot mechanics.
https://uk.joe-nimble.com/collections/accessories/products/flexitec-footbed
Double the price of the Xero, but if the Xero is going to fall to bits after 200 miles the Joe Nimble should work out cheaper in the long run.
I have been using Merrell Bare Access Flex for the past 6mos. They work really well for what little jogging I do anymore, around a mile per day…a far cry from the 7-10 mi I used to do before back surgery. They are not too heavy and can handle a few screws in the winter so I don’t go slipping on all the ice. Zero drop, sticky rubber, but not real durable uppers. They perform well and are slightly stuffer than my previous Merrell water shoes I used for that (went through a few pair over 5 years.) The price is OK, and they do have some non-intrusive arch support, but only about a 2-3mm lug. They don’t work well in mud but leaves/rocks/rock face doesn’t bother them. Very comfortable with a wide toebox though they run a bit small. So, order a half size larger. I think they weigh around 7oz/shoe. For 90/pr the price was right, too.
Geoff, please post some feedback on what you think of the Nimble shoes once you get them.
Michael – will do. It will be interesting to see how they work out, as there is pretty much nothing online about them. I guess the price puts people off.
By the way, just noticed that they’ve opened a US site. They’re not offering the trail shoe right now, but it’s new so I imagine they’ll be stocking it at some point.
https://us.joe-nimble.com
I emailed the Joe Nimble USA storefront and asked about the Trail model availability through it. They said simple we don’t offer it. And nothing about when they might or offering to special order.
Oh, and its not actually clear what is the difference between the Trail and non trail models. The descriptions on the UK and USA websites is insufficient to tell.
Yes – their online marketing is woeful. They are basically a bricks-and-mortar chain in Germany and don’t seem to understand the web very well. Add on the pricing and the cringe-worthy names and you can see why they are obscure.
They give a better description of the Trail shoe on their international site:
https://int.joe-nimble.com/nimbletoes-trail-1739
Mind you, very few shoe companies give you the info you really need. Look at this example from New Balance:
https://goo.gl/ZuintP
I picked up a pair of the TerraFlex. The sizing doesn’t seem small at all. I waver between 9.5 – 10, so I bought 10’s and they are quite generous. Almost too big but probably fine. They are also quite wide – not just the toe box but the whole way. I think of myself as having wide fit, and these feel a bit wide on me the whole way.
In terms of durability, the uppers look fairly durable, so the main area of concern is whether the uppers will still attached the lowers. I’d really like to find a pair of light shoes that is well put together.
terraventure shoe review coming. very solid shoe. fwiiw.
cheers
roger
Ho Geoff,
New here, sorry if I’ve missed many earlier reviews of the Vivos. What are your specific complaints on the vivos?
I’ve been wearing the Primus FG for several hundred miles. I bought the FG because I didn’t want the lugs to rip off like I know can happen with the SG. My chief complaint on the Vivos is the hard sole compound, which is extremely slippery on wet rock or wood. If the Xero Shoes are any better on slippery stuff, I will be happy (unless they fall apart). But the 5k promise makes me worry that they will be just as slippery?
Become a member to post in the forums.