- Sep 13, 2017 at 5:46 am #3490746
Katharina LångstrumpBPL Member
@kat_pLocale: Pacific CoastSep 13, 2017 at 9:13 am #3490760
This guy is such a bad senator in so many ways. I generally agree with his position here. His position here makes me at least reconsider my position though.Sep 13, 2017 at 11:00 am #3490774
What do you not like about Rand Paul?Sep 13, 2017 at 11:17 am #3490779
He consistently supports policies that harm the less fortunate.Sep 13, 2017 at 11:25 am #3490782
That is rather general.Sep 13, 2017 at 11:56 am #3490793
Todd StoughBPL Member
“The issue here is not just that our policy of permanent war needs to be ended.”
This will never happen. Even if congress began to do their job, they will just approve the spending. Most of what he does is meaningless because no one cares.Sep 13, 2017 at 12:35 pm #3490796
The senate needs a better spokesman to take on this position. Rand has been pretty bad at pulling together any kind of consensus. He’d rather wax about his consistent philosophy than do the real work of building consensus with other senators.Sep 13, 2017 at 5:09 pm #3490827
Ken T.BPL Member
More apt acronym. Funding Unrelenting KillingSep 13, 2017 at 6:13 pm #3490837
Nobody wants to support this. So, yeah, Rand has been bad at building support. WAR = $$$$
I’d support Rand if nothing else for this issue alone!
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.