Topic
Cuben vs Hybrid backpacks
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Cuben vs Hybrid backpacks
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Dec 11, 2014 at 4:22 am #1323571
Is there a big difference in durability (including bushwacking) between 1.42 oz/sqyd cuben and hybrid as used in zPacks zero? How much longer would a hybrid survive? (I'm fine with taping punctures & frays).
Dec 11, 2014 at 7:43 am #2155752Yes, huge difference.
Dec 11, 2014 at 8:33 am #2155756Can't really give a time frame on how much longer hybrid would last vs cuben, too many variables. 2.92oz Cuben Hybrid is much tougher than 1.43oz cuben. For me personally, I'll take the small weight penalty of the hybrid for more durability.
Dec 11, 2014 at 9:06 am #2155764Isn't it the same cuben but the hybrid has another fabric laminated to it?
-Tim
Dec 11, 2014 at 9:23 am #2155773yeah, it's 50 Denier Polyester. The regular cuben side is going to be on the inside of the pack and the polyester on the outside. Makes it much tougher and more resistant to abrasion.
Dec 11, 2014 at 9:25 am #2155774Not to derail but . . . aren't you working on a pack design Tim?
Dec 11, 2014 at 9:26 am #2155775Taken from Zpacks website
"2.92 oz/sqyd Cuben Hybrid This material is made from the same 1.43 oz/sqyd Cuben Fiber as seen above on the inside, with a protective layer of 50 Denier Polyester on the outside. The outer layer gives it more strength, and abrasion resistance, prevents fraying, and gives it a nice solid color. This material is used on our Arc Blast Backpacks."
so yeah, it has polyester on the outside. I have a cuben fiber hybrid backpack from Seekoutside just for that reason. I wanted the lighter weight, but reviews I read with straight Cuben fiber backpacks speak to durabilty issues. I figured if I'm using a trash compacter liner, I shouldn't get the wear and tear on the inside of the pack and the polyester laminate will give it some abrasion resistance on the outside.
Dec 11, 2014 at 9:37 am #2155781Chad,
Working on? Yes. Anywhere close to releasing? No;)
-Tim
Dec 11, 2014 at 3:55 pm #2155882AnonymousInactiveYou can sometimes get silnylon and 1.1 oz nylon for around 3 dollars a yard. Why not sew and/or bond (silicone adhesive) some UL cuben in between a layer of 30D silnylon (outside) and 1.1 nylon (inside)?
The cuben would provide high tensile strength and keep the material composite from stretching, and the outer layer of 30D silnylon and inner 30D nylon layer would provide abrasion resistance. 30D silnylon is probably as good, if not better, for this than the 50D polyester they laminate on just the outside of the hybrid cuben because the slickness of silnylon and because nylon has a bit higher tensile strength and more innate stretch which both contribute to higher wear/abrasion resistant properties at less weight/thickness than polyester (which are both strengthened by the silicone coating).
If you use the .51 cuben, it will be very slightly heavier than the hybrid cuben (if you include silicone adhesive weight), but not by much, but would still be cheaper. If you use the .34, it would come out to a similar weight (slightly under) and would be cheaper.
I wonder what would be ultimately tougher, the above type composite or the 2.92 hybrid cuben? Ideally, one would use something like 70D silnylon on the outside, and Argon on the inner but that would really increase price and to a lesser extent weight over the 2.92 hybrid cuben stuff.
Dec 12, 2014 at 5:17 am #2156049Thanks for the replies! Huge difference, does that mean hybrid is twice as durable or rather ten (10!) times as durable compared to naked cuben?
Dec 12, 2014 at 7:03 am #2156067Its more durable, but without actually wearing out a pack, hard to say. Reviews I read on the ArcBlast says after an AT through-hike, the interior of the pack started showing wear from taking gear in and out of it everyday. The Cuben fiber began to delaminate on the interior of the pack body. Zpacks rates their packs for ~1800 miles so that makes sense. The exterior should be fine as long as you don't drop it on sharp rocks or brush.
Dec 12, 2014 at 7:18 am #2156071Pack has maybe 1 yd2 of fabric
Any nylon that's 4 oz/yd2 is strong enough. Dynema is good. 200d oxford also works pretty good. 1.5 oz/yd2 silnylon marginally strong enough.
Cuben will be strong enough but only weigh 2 oz/yd2? so you save maybe 2 ounces. Hardly worth talking about.
A tent has maybe 10 yd2? If you go from 1.5 oz/yd2 sil, to 0.7 oz/yd2 cuben, you save 8 ounces. That is a better application for Cuben.
From a marketing point of view though, Cuben is great! The new, expensive, cool stuff.
Dec 12, 2014 at 8:00 am #2156087BPL did a review of packs a few years back
one thing that i worked out when the numbers were crunched was that the denier of the fabric had little correlation with the total weight of the pack
even using 400D+ fabric didnt mean a heavier pack in comparison with its lower denier fabric competitors
perhaps its time to do the same review again with cuben packs?
regardless i suspect that other things than the fabric weight matters more towards the total weight
is cuben fabric more abrasion resistant than say 400-800D+ nylon? (the standard on climbing packs)
;)
Dec 12, 2014 at 8:27 am #2156096The primary drivers of pack weight are not the fabric used but rather the frame (if any), padding, hardware, and strapping. Each individual component of those isn't usually terribly heavy, but they add up QUICK.
Hope it helps!
Dec 13, 2014 at 3:41 am #2156352If so, and if only a few oz more heavy, I'm interested in a leightweight pack that's much like zPacks zero, but not in cuben. Where to find such a pack (44+L) that weighs only 2 to 3 oz more (as stated above) than zPacks zero in cuben (4.6 oz)
Dec 13, 2014 at 4:31 am #2156353I'm sure that many folks will respond with good packs in that range. However, Chris Zimmer of Zimmerbuilt will make you one with whatever features you want, and I'm pretty sure that Joe over at ZPacks would be willing to make you a Zero out of another fabric. Both have excellent customer service.
Hope it helps!
Dec 13, 2014 at 10:22 am #2156405I would also recommend Zimmerbuilt. He uses cuben, hybrid cuben, dyneema, x-pac. Lots of options and his customer service and quality are excellent. Give him some input on design, materials and target weight and he will build it for you.
Dec 13, 2014 at 12:06 pm #2156427These custom Zimmerbuilt packs start at 200 $, that's even more than just a zPacks zero in cuben. What's the sense to go for a pack in cheaper material if it makes the pack even more expensive…
Dec 13, 2014 at 12:19 pm #2156434MLD Newt
2014 NEWT9oz
1700 ci / 28L
All Dyneema X (TM) Construction: 210d Ripstop Nylon and Dyneema plus an extra X pattern overweave for high strength, lightweight and durability. (Much tougher and abrasion resistant than thinner and lower content 140d nylon+dyneema plain weave fabrics.)
$69
Dec 13, 2014 at 12:20 pm #2156435Cuben hybrid is certainly not real abrasion resistant in my experience.
However, it is very puncture resistant
Obviously not to needles.
When considering cuben packs, ULA did puncture testing with a metal spike. The hybrid cuben had significantly more resistance than the normal heavy material being used as bottom fabric on the cicuit, at half the weight.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.