REI UL 45
- This topic is empty.
Nov 28, 2006 at 2:51 pm #1220434b dMember
@bdavisLocale: Mt. Lassen - Shasta, N. Cal.
Since I bought this pack I have never used another. Since it is REI I don't know if there is any prejudice against the brand, but they have been great to us.
With a bad lower back and neck I needed some kind of framing. This pack weighs (without removing any frills) in medium 2 lbs. 8 -10 oz. It is easy to get it down some oz.'s.
The frame is really "external" (so I put this review in the external back pack forum) in that it consists of a main stay in the middle of the external harness unit. The key to the pack for people with bad backs, and otherwise, is that the "external" harness is constructed so that the shoulder straps are connected to each other at the bottom by a strip of material which goes through a loop in the bottom of the harness unit. Thus … when one strap is pulled the other gives way and the pack is always balanced. This means you can crawl, duck, or cross rocky terrain without the pack fighting your back. I love it. Here is a picture of the harness –
The size is perfect for carrying a tent (w/ poles – Mountain Hardware Tri-Lite 2 or Squall from Gossamer Gear 2 person), stove and pot, cup, clothing, food, sleeping bag, poncho or rain gear, closed cell foam pads, therma rest or inflatable pad with foam or down inside, etc.
The top folds back and has zipper pockets on the inside and outside, so it carries emergency medical gear, windshirt, beanie, knife, mirror, matches, flashlight, etc. for easy access. Has side pockets for food and water (.5 liter Platypus). Has a back storage area for rain gear. Loops at bottom of pack to tie on pads if you want. Loops to hook on a Sling Lite chair or Coleman stool if you use such. I put my snow shovel on the back using the velcro things that come with it. Has waste band pockets for compass, watch, map, camera, etc.
All in all I love it (I haven't even used my Atmos pack since I got the REI). I would rather go purely UL without all the frills but my back can't take the entirely unsupported weight and flopping of the UL packs I tried — and I checked out a bunch of them.
Fabric is strong but will wear or be damaged if abused. That should not be a problem for the UL people – its way stronger than the really SUL and UL packs and stuff sack packs I tried.
It was $99 at REI and is on sale now for $74. In any case, this pack design concept in the hands of UL people has a great future in my mind — I am thinking of cutting the pack loose from the "external" harness/frame unit and making my own UL stuff sack type pack to fit on the harness. For what it is, it is a clear 5 in my book, even if the weight is not pure UL it is as low a weight pack as I have found which can give me the back relief I need.Jan 7, 2007 at 2:02 pm #1373421Robb StanekSpectator
@rstanekLocale: Southeast, Atlanta, GA
Having tried frameless and framed UL packs, I find this pack to be a very nice solution thus far.
Having a very thin frame myself, I find that with loads above 15 lbs or so, my body needs some sort fo rigid frame for overall comfort.
I like how easy the pack is to adjust, and am a fan of the swinging shoulder straps. The internal cinching system works nicely and the fabric has held up very well.
Some improvements I'd make:
The one "stretch" pocket on the hipbelt needs to be re-designed a bit. It's simply not very big so it's somehwat less usable.
I like packs with a stretch cord system on the front for jackets, map cases, etc.
The mesh pockets on the sides could be a bit taller(not bigger). I like the be able to use these for my HH in the snake skins.
Otherwise, I really like this pack, and it's ery affordable. Kudos to REI for designing a house brand UL pack.Jun 6, 2007 at 3:07 pm #1391408Alan MarcumMember
@ammpilotLocale: SF Bay Area
I picked up this pack also on sale. Alas, REI discontinued it–or so I thought. Rather, they changed a few things and now call it the "Quick UL 45."
Robert wished for a bigger stretch pocket on the hip belt. Looks like they've replaced the stretch pocket with a bigger zipped pocket. It's just a touch than the original version.
b d called this an external frame pack. I guess I consider my old Kelty Tioga an external, and this an internal. Regardless, I was looking for a lighter pack that could handle a long weekend's load–both for weight and volume. This fit the bill nicely and, if I changed shelters, for much longer.
I find the slot for the drinking tube a bit small for my bite valves. I like the hip belt pockets very much: I put map, compass, pocket knife in the zipped one, gorp in the mesh one. Nice and convenient.
- The forum ‘Reader Reviews’ is closed to new topics and replies.
August 4 @ 5:30 PM US MDT: Member Q&A • Backcountry Photography & Cameras
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.