Topic
Best UL rope for food hanging/multi-purpose?
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Best UL rope for food hanging/multi-purpose?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jun 22, 2014 at 7:12 am #2113572
Hiking Malto, obviously you have never been corrected by a Yosemite National Park backcountry ranger.
That was what happened up until about 15 years ago. Since then, they've enforced the use of bear canisters, so the hanging method is a moot point.
–B.G.–
Jun 22, 2014 at 7:33 am #2113578+1 w/arborist throw line.
Jun 22, 2014 at 7:58 am #2113581"Hiking Malto, obviously you have never been corrected by a Yosemite National Park backcountry ranger.
That was what happened up until about 15 years ago. Since then, they've enforced the use of bear canisters, so the hanging method is a moot point."
Bob,
There are plenty of hiking areas outside the Sierra where canisters are not required. So it is hardly a moot point.Jul 15, 2014 at 10:28 am #2119900How to hang food using the counter balance with retrieval cord method.
Pick appropriate tree and branch. In bad bear areas a proper tree may dictate where you camp. As you near timber line there may not be tall enough trees, so you must plan ahead. The limb should be about 20+ feet from the ground. Higher is better as bears are less likely to jump off a limb onto the bags if they know they will take a long fall. The bags should hang about 10' out from the tree. Where the rope goes over the limb, the diameter of the limb should be about the size of your wrist or smaller. Larger and they can climb out the limb, smaller and they can break or chew through the limb. Some bears can get any food hang too. Check with local authorities about food storage methods. Food hangs work best with wild bears that have some fear of humans.
Camping with groups, I have had to hang as much as 200 lbs of food each evening. It can take several hours, and several trees, to do it right for that much food. A bear resistant canister may be a safer and easier choice for some folks.
Jul 15, 2014 at 2:29 pm #2119987David, that is a good illustration. I tend to agree with your 65-foot length. I always found 50 to be too short and 100 was too long, so 65-70 was best. For a heavy food weight, more length is useful. It depends on what kind of trees you have.
Instead of bear bells, we used to tie our metal cookware onto the tree. The bear sees about four or five cook pots, each with a rock inside, and wonders whether he really needs to climb that tree. The rock rattles when anything moves it.
For one tree, we used to wrap a space blanket around the trunk. The bear would look at it and wonder what that was instead of climbing it.
The half-grown Yosemite black bears were the worst. They had no fear of falling off tree branches. Sometimes they will see the branch with the food bags, and they climb above it on the trunk. Then they jump off, hoping to catch the food bags on the way down. Those were called Kamikaze Bears.
–B.G.–
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.