Topic

My Latest Alcohol Stove Design


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) My Latest Alcohol Stove Design

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 18 posts - 26 through 43 (of 43 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2037912
    Delmar O’Donnell
    Member

    @bolster

    Locale: Between Jacinto & Gorgonio

    > I did some experiments…

    Helluvan interesting post James, thanks for taking the time to write it out.

    #2037988
    Colin Krusor
    BPL Member

    @ckrusor

    Locale: Northwest US

    "A mid-sized grease pot with a built in "fresnell" style heat exchanger to increase the bottom area by about 15-20%, and a tight fitting wind screen is what I use on most camping trips."

    James, the heat exchanger you're referring to is new to me. Maybe it has been explained elsewhere and I missed it. Do you mean that the heat exchanger has concentric ridges like a Fresnel lens? And it is built into the pot? I have thought about making a die that would press large concentric ridges into the bottom of a pot to increase the surface area. I imagined relatively deep, rolling ridges that would give the bottom of the pot a wavy or rippled shape inside and out. Do you have any photos of your heat exchanger?

    #2037992
    Jerry Adams
    BPL Member

    @retiredjerry

    Locale: Oregon and Washington

    maybe rather than increasing surface area, the advantage is it creates turbulent flow which better conducts the heat to the pot?

    #2038096
    Dan Yeruski
    BPL Member

    @zelph

    Locale: www.bplite.com

    Hey proofreader bob, take a look at his photo, see the moisture droplets being absorbed………:-)))

    About the moisture on the pot….Wikipedia says heat transfer is much less at that place on the pot.

    water absorbtion photo ImusaCondensation_zps618f8d0c.jpg

    DY
    Adventures In DIY Stove Making

    #2038097
    Roger Caffin
    BPL Member

    @rcaffin

    Locale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe

    Hi Dan

    > see the moisture droplets being absorbed
    Most unfair – you will lose a lot of novices that way!

    For anyone puzzled by this: the water droplets are obviously the result of condensation, but not from the atmosphere. The source of the water vapour is the burning of the alcohol: the hydrogen in it is converted to water vapour when it is burnt. The cold pot simply condenses that water vapour. Well known, especially to people used to melting snow.

    Cheers
    PS: also happens with white gas and canister stoves.

    #2038110
    Bob Gross
    BPL Member

    @b-g-2-2

    Locale: Silicon Valley

    Dan, you have a chemical reaction going on there. The droplets are Dihydrogen Monoxide. It certainly seems like a waste.

    –B.G.–

    #2038114
    Dan Yeruski
    BPL Member

    @zelph

    Locale: www.bplite.com

    Bob, what was coming down there was….I was pulling your leg :-)

    #2038116
    Bob Gross
    BPL Member

    @b-g-2-2

    Locale: Silicon Valley

    Dan, do you admit to creating that chemical reaction?

    Dihydrogen Monoxide can kill.

    –B.G.–

    #2038128
    Delmar O’Donnell
    Member

    @bolster

    Locale: Between Jacinto & Gorgonio

    > Dihydrogen Monoxide can kill.

    It's showing up everywhere. I read they're often finding large quantities of dihydrogen monoxide INSIDE the new BPA-free Nalgene bottles…and the larger the bottle, the more dihydrogen monixide…looks like smaller bottles are safer.

    But having a stove that creates it…is truly worrysome…makes carbon monoxide pale by comparison. Maybe we should start a social action campaign against it? I'll bet Halliburton is at the bottom of it.

    #2038132
    Bob Gross
    BPL Member

    @b-g-2-2

    Locale: Silicon Valley

    Blame it on Dan. He did it.

    –B.G.–

    #2038319
    Dan Yeruski
    BPL Member

    @zelph

    Locale: www.bplite.com

    I take full responsibility :(

    #2038327
    Bob Gross
    BPL Member

    @b-g-2-2

    Locale: Silicon Valley

    That's the good thing about working with small stoves. Whether they are successes or failures, they all go up in flames.

    –B.G.–

    #2038330
    Ken Thompson
    BPL Member

    @here

    Locale: Right there

    Dihydrogen Monoxide aka water can kill. Usually through drowning.

    #2038335
    Jerry Adams
    BPL Member

    @retiredjerry

    Locale: Oregon and Washington

    or if you drink too much – but takes a lot

    #2038344
    Roger Caffin
    BPL Member

    @rcaffin

    Locale: Wollemi & Kosciusko NPs, Europe

    Hi Dan

    > You and Roger could not see that, my bad
    You jest!

    Cheers

    #2038468
    James Marco
    BPL Member

    @jamesdmarco

    Locale: Finger Lakes

    "… Do you mean that the heat exchanger has concentric ridges like a Fresnel lens? And it is built into the pot? I have thought about making a die that would press large concentric ridges into the bottom of a pot to increase the surface area. I imagined relatively deep, rolling ridges that would give the bottom of the pot a wavy or rippled shape inside and out. Do you have any photos of your heat exchanger?"

    Yes. Here is a pic:
    four_pots example

    Note that this pic traces the design evolution from a small bundt pan to a dished out pot to the ridged design. I am currently using a 5 ribbed design rather than the one pictured with 3 ribs. I just anealed the bottom then used a piece of maple as a form to hammer around it. Took about a half hour, but stamping them would be far easier at about a second or two.

    I called it the Xpot for the combination between heat exchanger/pot directly. Simple and foolproof on the trail. I found that three rings were too few, though. The pot would not sit level. I simply added a couple more on the next iteration. The metal sort of "tempers" back up fairly well from the shaping, but the sidewalls are still fairly soft.

    #2038483
    Dan Yeruski
    BPL Member

    @zelph

    Locale: www.bplite.com

    James,you might find some interesting information about heat flow on the bottom of a pot in this thread over at my website:
    Heat flow Around a Pot by “Tony”

    Does that bundt pan fit perfectly inside the grease pot?

    DY
    Adventures In DIY Stove Making

    #2040349
    James Marco
    BPL Member

    @jamesdmarco

    Locale: Finger Lakes

    "James,you might find some interesting information about heat flow on the bottom of a pot in this thread over at my website:
    Heat flow Around a Pot by “Tony”

    Does that bundt pan fit perfectly inside the grease pot?"

    Dan,
    I will check it out. Sorry about the delay, been pretty busy…

    No, the pan doesn't fit into the grease pot…more document my thought process. I dragged the wife down to the Salvation Army Store to buy up every bundt pan they had. The one medium sized one holds 2.5 cups of water. Boiling was MUCH helped by heating the inside and outside simultaneously. So, I took a grease pot and dished in the bottom, but this only helped about 7%. To me it looked like a proportunate increase with surface area minus a but due to heat "puddling" in the hollow bottom. So, I made one with some deep ridges. This increased the heating surface slightly, and, also allowed better heat flow around the bottom. Roughly, about a 10% decrease in heating times for the same fuel. I made three others (not pictured) that performed a bit better at about 12-15% (14.5% average, 13.2% average and 12.8% average. I tested each for 5 runs and averaged them.)

    It occured to me that they looked like a Fresnel lens, and hold the same conditions. Heat (IR radiation) was being focused into the pan/water in the same way, a working hypothesis, but never tried to test this. Sounded like a ray gun if pushed much further. (I did some research into IR lasers, etc…old stuff…aluminum is very lossy.)

    Anyway, I pushed the limits to 9 deep rings but found I could not clean them easily in the field. The piece of scrubbie I carry would not fit easily into the inside. I later cound that 7 rings was a bit too tight even though I was getting about a 20% increase in heat transfers. I dropped to 5 rings and about a 17%-18% transfer and let it go. I am not exactly sure it works by heat/air flow, or, IR refraction. But it does work. The picture was more to document my thought process and maybe prevent patenting (along with my notebook.) I do NOT belive in patents, and am not sure it is patenable, anyway. Feel free…

Viewing 18 posts - 26 through 43 (of 43 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...