Topic
WAA Ultrabag® MDS 20L
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › WAA Ultrabag® MDS 20L
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jul 29, 2013 at 1:57 pm #1305972
This French bag is something I really want to try. I've gone out fast trekking for longer periods of time with little more than an REI Flash Pack (~300 grams) and been, for the most part, happy. But that's not to say that I couldn't be a whole lot happier.
For a measly 200 grams I could have more storage, better balance, and constant access to things like food and water.
Next up, figuring out how to import this beauty.
Jul 29, 2013 at 1:58 pm #2010630Oh man, the future is now. I love it.
Jul 29, 2013 at 3:15 pm #2010675That is awesome, loud but awesome.
http://www.ultramarathonrunningstore.com/WAA-Ultra-Equipment-ULTRABAG-20L-Pack-p/waaultrabag20l.htmJul 30, 2013 at 8:00 am #2010856I like the black and grey option, and, of course I'd love to see this pack incorporate some even lighter materials (like cuben) where it would work and count.
Jul 31, 2013 at 12:50 pm #2011199Last night while catching up on some writing I came across this trip report from UltraPedestrian Ras. While its a very compelling story on its own his sextuple crossing of the Grand Canyon was completed with his WAA Ultrabag MDS. Thus, why I reference it here.
You can also get more information about this epic crossing if you listen to the pod-cast Ultra Talk by Ian Corless, episode #36. If you can stay with the whole three hour broadcast you'll also get to hear from my friend Stevie Kremer who's been upsetting podium expectations in Europe all summer.
Enjoy!
Jul 31, 2013 at 1:02 pm #2011203"I like the black and grey option, and, of course I'd love to see this pack incorporate some even lighter materials (like cuben) where it would work and count."
Yeah, the pack seems kind of heavy – around 3 pounds when fully outfitted if I did my conversions correctly.
Jul 31, 2013 at 1:06 pm #2011205Hum, compared to other MOLLE systems three pounds is featherweight, but I agree with you. It could be much lighter. There needs to be a more refined balance between the weight of the pack and its versatility and convertibility. I wonder how many people add more than two water bottle pockets on the shoulder straps for instance? You could probably cut out at least a pound of unnecessary MOLLE webbing from other locations if you knew you'd never use those straps.
Jul 31, 2013 at 1:30 pm #2011214"compared to other MOLLE systems three pounds is featherweight"
True, and i assume heavier materials are used for durability – since they're made for ultras.
Jul 31, 2013 at 1:33 pm #2011215"True, and i assume heavier materials are used for durability – since they're made for ultras."
Without question, ultras where there's a lot of abrasive material floating around and getting into every knock and cranny.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.