Topic

Fleece reconsidered


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) Fleece reconsidered

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 23 posts - 51 through 73 (of 73 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1974744
    Eric Blumensaadt
    BPL Member

    @danepacker

    Locale: Mojave Desert

    I love a good GTX Pro Shell or an eVent shell. They breathe well and keep the wind out well.

    A "softshell" usually isn't much of a shell for keeping wind out and mine (Gore Windstopper) isn't very warm. Too much weight and not enough performance.

    My ancient (18 year old) Polartec 300 fleece is still very warm under a good WPB hardshell. 200 weight fleece isn't nearly as warm. It's great for active wear.

    My 800 fill down jacket in my avatar IS warm, especialy under a good WPB shell or in my sleeping bag.

    So, depending on the situation I'll take either fleece for active wear, or down for much less active situations or both(i.e. y 200 wt. fleece vest and my EB down "sweater"). One for hiking and one for camp or both on a bitter morning.

    #1974745
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    "Daniel my brother…"

    Here is said thread from before: http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/forums/thread_display.html?forum_thread_id=72312

    Hey, i was pretty close on the remembered weights, and i'm not even an obsessive gram weenie!

    #1974810
    Barry P
    BPL Member

    @barryp

    Locale: Eastern Idaho (moved from Midwest)

    Just to add a little bit more to my post above, I’m also a heavy sweater since my clothes become stained white form sweat surfs- any time of the year. So I know how fleece is much appreciated for its breathability. That’s why I love the breathable panels in my Action thermawrap. And I like the thumb holes in the sleeves so the sleeves stay tucked in my short gloves.

    And to add a little more advertising, I got my Action Thermawrap while living in the humid Illinois. And it kept me warm there as it does in Idaho now. So it’s quite the flexible piece of engineered clothing. So is there any synthetic puffy that is as breathable as the now obsolete Action Thermawrap by Montbell?

    And to add more to the breathability scenario, do quality down jackets breathe well? To be more specific, in 0F weather, I wear my WM Flash Jacket. I put a towel between my backpack and coat (actually I do that all year). The towel is consistently soaked from sweat but my shirt and jacket is dry (although I do get white marks on my shirt). So do WM down jackets wick sweat through its system and out into the environment?

    Just wondering.
    -Barry
    -The mountains were made for Tevas

    #1974832
    Steve K
    BPL Member

    @skomae

    Locale: northeastern US

    The Arcteryx Atom LT and the Mountain Hardwear Zonal both feature synthetic insulation and stretch fleece sides. Can't speak to the Zonal, as I've only tried it in store, but the Atom LT strikes the perfect breathability for me for ice climbing. Never used it backpacking however, as I prefer vests if I'm wearing insulation on hiking trips.

    #1974838
    BlackHatGuy
    Spectator

    @sleeping

    Locale: The Cascades

    "So is there any synthetic puffy that is as breathable as the now obsolete Action Thermawrap by Montbell?"

    Don't know, but Montbell does make the Thermawrap BC, which combines exceloft insulation with fleece side gussets. The Eddie Bauer has the Accelerant Jacket which does the same kind of thing.

    Don't know anything about either jacket except that they exist, but they might do for what you're looking for.

    #1974862
    Daniel Fish
    Member

    @danielfishfamilypdx-com

    Locale: PDX

    #1974909
    Barry P
    BPL Member

    @barryp

    Locale: Eastern Idaho (moved from Midwest)

    Stephen and Doug – those are good finds. I didn’t know Eddie Bauer made such a nice jacket; I’ll have to check them out. Thanx.

    “Until there a synthetic puffy that insulates while compressed in a bivy or a tight sleeping bag..,”

    That’s an extremely tight sleeping bag (or bivy). That puts the bag warmth at risk.

    “Until there's a synthetic puffy that can be literally wrung out after hanging off the pack in constant rain and melting snow falling from trees, the fleece wins. ”

    Don’t all ‘puffies’ excel here? At least my warmer-and-lighter-than-fleece Montbell never needs to be wrung out. It only retains 1% of water. And plus the melting snow won’t cling to it — consequently eliminating the snowman look. Thus the bogged-down water weight is greatly minimized.

    But let me suggest some pluses for fleece: they’re soft and quiet. That’s why I wear fleece every day in the winter in my house. In fact my whole household wears fleece in the house. I keep the house cold. The money saved is spent on trips :) Oh yea, that’s another plus for fleece: it’s cheaper than puffies.

    -Barry
    -The Rockies and Illinois bogs were made for Tevas

    #1974926
    Daniel Fish
    Member

    @danielfishfamilypdx-com

    Locale: PDX

    #1974944
    Jeffs Eleven
    BPL Member

    @woodenwizard

    Locale: NePo

    My hiking buddy uses his Alpine Light all the time (in PNW)

    Maybe since you put it (directly?) under your shell the wetness was pushed through the ALs DWR by the pressure of the shell.

    MontBells DWR is purty good but having the shell physically rubbing on it may have compromised it.

    In the rain I've been putting my puffy layer (thermawrap Pro) under my thin Fleece layer (OR Centrifuge) then shell.

    So hiking in 40F rain I go

    Skin
    Under Armor T (sometimes 2)
    {Centrifuge If its near 30F and an easy trail)
    Shell

    The Centrifuge is the variable- dependent on the trail difficulty and temp. Much above 35F and its too hot unless I'm going downhill.

    At camp

    Skin
    UA ts
    Thermawrap
    Centrifuge
    OR Helium 2

    I think having a sacrificial fleece layer to be a barrier between a puffy and a shell is paramount. (is paramount the right word? It sounds cool)

    #1974963
    Daniel Fish
    Member

    @danielfishfamilypdx-com

    Locale: PDX

    #1974982
    Jeffs Eleven
    BPL Member

    @woodenwizard

    Locale: NePo

    I swear by two light syn shirts. I have yet to try long sleeve tee and a short sleeve pairing. Two long sleeves would be too hot for me.

    My theory:
    One syn Tee, for me, is too chilly in all but summer due to the high evap rate. Two shirts slows this process down and cuts the wind also. They will still dry quickly in sun or light work loads. I used to do a light wool Tee under a syn tee but that was either too hot or too wet.

    Too wet meaning it didnt dry quickly enough.

    I do have some Smartwool Sleeves which are awesome to start hiking in because you can pull them off while hiking when you get hot. You're literally pulling off a hot layer of clothing- it works fast. But to put them back on you have to strip down to bare arms and sometimes its cold and I don't wanna do that.

    Sooner or later I'm going to get a Under Armour long sleeve tee and pair it with a s/s tee to see if works better.

    The sleeves are sweet though because I can cover just my forearms, or even pull them over my hands, but since I got the OR Metamorph gloves I havent been wearing them as much.

    I guess that was thread drift… sorry.

    #1975034
    Josh Brock
    Member

    @needsabath

    Locale: Outside

    Im not sure it ever really drifted far enough away to call it reconsidered. Most of the big names still make fleece Prods and honestly I dont know that comparing fleece to a puffy is really that relavent(soft shells are a different story). As most people have already stated they use the two garments differently and warmth to weight ratio is not even close?

    I would say that most 100 wt fleece sweaters are atleast as heavy as my UL Patty down sweater. I have been shopping for a fleece lately(R1, R2, various Arctyrex ones same with tnf) and all of them are heavier. None are even close to as warm(I have one R1 already)

    Also people keep talking about combining it with a wind shirt. Alot of the wind shirts that I have seen on the market have the same material as the shell fabric on the UL puffies. So I honestly cant say that a wind shirt fleece combo would breath better and even so your adding another 2-7 oz on top of the already heavier fleece.

    I like fleece but disagree with comparing it to a down puffy. I never grab one instead of the other because to me they do not represent the same part of a layering system.

    I completely agree that it is better than a soft shell. But I have never really been a fan of those personally. I dont even own one and I have multiples of everything else.

    Lately Ive been liking Certain PolarTec items. The ones that remind me of the old polypropolene long sleeve insulating layers. Its very similar to fleece.

    #1975290
    Brian Lindahl
    BPL Member

    @lindahlb

    Locale: Colorado Rockies

    > BTW, I tried a couple soft shell jackets this winter and found them
    > useless. Great around town, but just a cold boat anchor on the trail.
    > I finally came to the conclusion that they fit in the same slot as a
    > Levi jacket, but synthetic instead of cotton. A windshirt and a 100w
    > fleece will kick any soft shell in the derriere.

    Except when:
    1) you need more durability
    2) a windshirt isn't breathable enough
    3) a fleece breaths too much
    4) layering/delayering to meet changing conditions is impractical

    Just make sure you don't get a laminate-based softshell – no breathability.

    Skiing, climbing and mountain biking are where softshells excel. You couldn't pay me to use a fleece/windshirt over a softshell for this kind of stuff. The noise factor with windshirts for skiing and mountain biking is a pretty nice bonus as well.

    #1 and #4 means that they also work very well for pants. I use softshell pants for backpacking almost exclusively.

    As for lightweight fleeces, this one is about as light as I've ever seen:
    http://www.thenorthface.com/catalog/sc-gear/mens-tka-100-microvelour-glacier-1_4-zip.html

    Competes with the Montbell Thermawrap, IMO.

    #1975335
    Luke Schmidt
    BPL Member

    @cameron

    Locale: Alaska

    Brian said – "As for lightweight fleeces, this one is about as light as I've ever seen:
    http://www.thenorthface.com/catalog/sc-gear/mens-tka-100-microvelour-glacier-1_4-zip.html

    Competes with the Montbell Thermawrap, IMO."

    So Brian are you saying its as light as the Thermawrap or as warm or both?

    #1975337
    Paul Magnanti
    BPL Member

    @paulmags

    Locale: Colorado Plateau

    Funny, I actually prefer a fleece and windshirt combo for backcountry skiing.

    Versatility. Versatility. Versatility.

    Which is what you CAN'T do with a puffy or softshell for that matter . The insulation and shell are one product. (Which is also why I don't like windblock fleece). I make the comparison as many people use the 'mini-puffies' in place of what fleece (or a wool sweater) was used for.

    My softshell is for around town and alpine climbs.

    Never did get into MTB so can't speak to that.

    As for fleece never getting that far away. Of couse the manufactuters still make it. It is a best selling item for 'around town' and what I call 'outdoor as lifestyle' with a nice profit margin, but my point is that it has fallen out of favor for overall backcountry use. At least that is what it seems to me.

    Finally, I've laid out why I still prefer fleece. Glad you have had different results. For me, personally, I'll stick to fleece for the conditions stated. I'd like to think I've done enough where I feel comfortable with my choices and reasoning. ;-)

    #1975413
    Josh Brock
    Member

    @needsabath

    Locale: Outside

    Paul- As long as you're comfortable in your gear thats all that counts…. Thanks for the discussion though.

    By the way my prefered ski gear is my alpha sv jacket(snowing), sv bibs, patty base layer, REI polar tec vest or R1. But im in the sierras and its not that cold. I went to bridger bowl in Montana and had to wear my puffy under my sv it was so cold. The snow was so light it was like snow boarding on baby powder.

    Happy trails.

    #1975423
    David Chenault
    BPL Member

    @davec

    Locale: Queen City, MT

    Fleece can mean many different things. When I say it I mean a 200-300 weight fuzz pile, with no membrane. R1, 100 weight polartec, and various "soft shell" wovens can be handy but have different primary purposes.

    Usefully defining soft shell is of course even worse.

    The primary problem with down and synth puffy layers is moisture from within. Synth deals with it better, but when compared to fleece dry times under less ideal conditions are still not so good.

    Ideally you'll only wear the puff for breaks, and have opportunities to dry the residual (usually back) moisture the layer does accumulate. If you're out in consecutive days of moist weather with no respite, and especially if you get cold and tired and need to hike in the puff layer (which will eventually happen), even synthetic fills will come up lacking.

    #1975443
    Paul Magnanti
    BPL Member

    @paulmags

    Locale: Colorado Plateau

    "Fleece can mean many different things. When I say it I mean a 200-300 weight fuzz pile, with no membrane"

    That's my personal definition as well for this discussion.

    "The primary problem with down and synth puffy layers is moisture from within.

    …….

    If you're out in consecutive days of moist weather with no respite, and especially if you get cold and tired and need to hike in the puff layer (which will eventually happen), even synthetic fills will come up lacking."

    Find this to be true, too.

    As others said more succinctly than I: For active wear – fleece. For breaks- puffies.

    In winter and/or cold and rainy conditions, I feel the fleece luv. :)

    In the mainly dry conditions I see here in the American Rockies and southwest during three season backpacks, I take my puffy and leave the fleece for car camping. A few sparks in my beater fleece around the camp fire is no big thing. :)

    #1975811
    Robert Kelly
    BPL Member

    @qiwiz

    Locale: UL gear @ QiWiz.net

    Very interesting thread. Since I enjoyed reading all the posts so much, I'll make a contribution to it. I have been replacing synthetic insulation with down for the majority of my gear choices that are used for sleeping or in-camp or on-trail breaks.

    However, for hiking insulation, I use no down, as many have said.

    As far as fleece is concerned, whether I bring any depends on what I expect to encounter and how sure or unsure I am about those expectations. The higher my perceived risk of cold wet conditions, the more likely it is that I'll bring some fleece.

    I will put in a plug here for merino wool (I like Icebreakers) in winter, since I can wear it for days without ever taking it off and it does not get stinky in the process.

    My favorite winter system for backpacking in the Eastern woodlands that I frequent with daytime temps usually ranging from mid teens to mid 30s in general, is this: I wear a mock zip neck merino base layer (Icebreaker 240 wt). To this I add a Golite windshirt, followed by a Marmot Driclime windshirt (essentially a thin fleece with attached windshirt) with a DIY hood, and a fleece ear band, a Possumdown beanie, and merino gloves. I have a down puffy ready to take out of top of pack during breaks if I get chilly.

    This gives me tons of options by shedding and adding layers as needed. The extra Golite windshirt only weighs 3 oz and lets me have just a thin wind layer over the merino, which is frequently all I need once I get warmed up and the day warms up. It also makes it very easy to get the DriClime on and off since it is slippery, and the inner fleece of the DriClime is not. By the end of the day, some sweat will have accumulated in my merino layer, at least over the back where my pack was. Once the pack is off, as I'm getting my shelter set up and gear organized, much of the moisture in the merino layer gets pushed out by body heat. By the time I hit the sack, my hiking layers are usually dry enough to be sleeping insulation if its cold enough to need them for that. More often than not, it is, especially if I am using a sleeping quilt. I would think that a fleece layer could probably replace the merino layer in this system.

    #1975959
    Mike Oxford
    BPL Member

    @moxford

    Locale: Silicon Valley, CA

    I prefer wool over fleece, though they are close IMHO.

    I use wool-baselayers and sometime fleece over the top. Down reserved for puffy and sleeping bag.
    Usually with a thin merino LS shirt and a heavier merino over that I'm good if active. I have a light EB FA wind jacket to cut the breeze and an eVent rain-shell if things are thought to be nasty.

    Unlike many, I put the windshell on over the puffy, so that heat trapped in the down isn't as affected by the wind.

    Fleece, for me, is almost too much. I "sweat easy" and even with a little activity can overheat quickly.

    And since I "sweat easy" it futhers my case for merino…. *laugh*

    -mox

    #1977994
    Daniel Fish
    Member

    @danielfishfamilypdx-com

    Locale: PDX

    #1978016
    Kate Magill
    BPL Member

    @lapedestrienne

    The great thing about wool and fleece is that you can score secondhand sweaters for $5 at goodwill, salvo, etc. my favorite backpacking mid-layer is a TNF grid fleece that I picked up at a secondhand shop one day when I forgot my jacket at home. It is warm enough but not too warm, wicks well, layers well, and when I retire it I will have more than gotten my money's worth out of it.

    I have a hard time shelling out a hundred bucks for a new piece of icebreaker, ibex, etc when an old lambswool sweater will do basically the same thing and I don't have to baby it. on long trips, ul merino knits simply wear through too fast. I am all for natural fibers, but for extended use under my pack straps everyday, synthetics and blends offer better bang-for-buck. Merino is a very short-staple fiber compared to other varieties of wool; its main appeal over other wools is its softness, not its durability. I will note however that Ibex has a great lifetime guarantee; I have had excellent experiences returning some pretty shredded wool baselayers and receiving replacements no questions asked.

    Fleece, on the other hand, is both soft and lasts forever. I have some "vintage" pieces in my closet that are going strong after 20 or so years :-)

    #1978021
    Jerry Adams
    BPL Member

    @retiredjerry

    Locale: Oregon and Washington

    I wear "REI" fleece vest my wife got from Goodwill

    My previous fleece vest died because the zipper quit working – came unzipped in the middle. I could have replaced zipper but it was cheaper to get "new" one and there were other wear areas in the old vest.

Viewing 23 posts - 51 through 73 (of 73 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...