Topic

Light Pack for Family Trips? (60L+ and 35 lbs+ capacity)


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) Light Pack for Family Trips? (60L+ and 35 lbs+ capacity)

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 27 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1301384
    Ben R
    BPL Member

    @snowfiend131

    Locale: Colorado

    Need a bigger pack for family trips this year. My ULA Circuit was usable for single night trips last year, carried fine, but very tight on space. Won't cut it for multi-night trips.

    Need at least 60L in the main part of the pack (the Circuit's is 48L), and the ability to comfortably carry 35 lbs (i.e. a frame or very effective stays). Lighter than 3 lbs would be nice, but must be lighter than 4 lbs. Cost < $400, so that rules out custom McHales and such.

    My research so far:

    1. Per the website, the ULA Catalyst doesn't really have much more volume than the Circuit (an extra 300 cubic inches in the main bag + extension collar). Bummer, because I like the Circuit. Can anyone verify this?

    2. Many of the major brands(Osprey, Gregory, Deuter, Granite Gear, etc.) have light packs but often top out on volume right at 60L. I plan to try on a Granite Gear Blaze and Deuter Act Zero or Act Lite, and an Osprey Atmos 65. All are either a bit smaller or heavier than I'd like. Am I missing any obvious choices?

    3. Golite's website appears to finally show their packs back in stock. How is the latest version of the Quest?

    4. The HMG Porter 4400 looks perfect on paper (huge and crazy light), if its comfortable enough. How does its comfort and load carrying ability compare to all the other 3-4 lb packs of similar size? It seems too good to be true (light, big, carries loads well?).

    Any input appreciated. Thanks.

    #1973562
    Herman
    BPL Member

    @hre814

    Locale: Alaska

    I think the Osprey Aether 85 is a great family pack. Depend on how light you want to go. One pound in pack weight in a pack that size and carrying that volume is not a big deal.

    #1973564
    Justin Mckinney
    BPL Member

    @sierrajud

    Locale: California

    I have a Osprey Aether 70 pack for sale. Lightly used. I'm asking $ 140.00 plus shipping and paypal % . Might be what your looking for.

    #1973567
    Greg F
    BPL Member

    @gregf

    Locale: Canadian Rockies

    Maybe ULA would do a custom catalyst with a longer extension collar to get more space.

    Maybe a Six moon designs starlite with stay.

    For family trips I use an old MEC Serratus pack that after trimming and lid removal weighs a tad under 4 lbs and is about 60 L.

    #1973625
    Nick Larsen
    Member

    @stingray4540

    Locale: South Bay

    My wife and I love our ACT lites. Inexpensive, reasonably light, comfy, great volume.
    That being said, I recently picked up an external frame jansport scout, and plan to use it on my next trip. Removing two unnecessary bars it weighs less than my Deuter, should be less sweaty, and should be at least as comfy if not more so. We'll see, but so far in the house it is all of those.

    You could pick one up on Craigslist for $20-$30, and it can have as much volume as you want if you need to strap stuff outside the pack. Bear can fits perfect under the pack…

    #1973631
    J-L
    BPL Member

    @johnnyh88

    The 4400 Porter is worth a shot. If you like it, seems like it could be a "do-it-all" pack for you.

    There's also the Exped Lightning 60: http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/forums/thread_display.html?forum_thread_id=75347

    Not sure if it would be big enough for you, but it may be worth trying out.

    #1973636
    Ike Jutkowitz
    BPL Member

    @ike

    Locale: Central Michigan

    My wife bought me the Porter (expedition) about 1.5 years ago for family trips. Before that, I used to use a Dana Designs terra plane (about 7 lb for pack alone).

    I'm pretty happy with the expedition pack, and it has become my go-to winter pack as well. The compression system is great. I've shrunk it pretty well around 9 lb of gear and had it stuffed to the gills with probably 35-40 lbs of gear. Not sure about exact weight, as I make it a practice not to weigh family stuff, but I carried 3 sleeping bags, 3 pads, tent, extra changes of kids clothes, sweaters, jackets, real food, kids toys, etc….

    It is a great platform for strapping skis and snowshoes, is built tough, has just the right amount of padding, and the waterproofing is nice. Overall a great pack that I would buy again in a heartbeat.

    As far as weaknesses, a wraparound hip belt would do a much better job when carrying heavy loads. I also have slight concerns about the way a couple seams were sewn (see below), but this has not yet manifested as a problem.

    1631

    1838
    When you're with Dora it's time to explore

    seam
    Seam under tension. I reinforced this area with seam grip and have seen no change with use.

    See the thorough rolling review on this pack by RJ for durability info.

    #1973642
    And E
    Spectator

    @lunchandynner

    Locale: Pacific Northwest

    I have the newer Golite Quest 65L pack and I love it. It's frame goes to the middle of the hip belt and carries weight very well. They also make a 80L version as well. Plus, they're really affordable.

    #1973721
    Ben R
    BPL Member

    @snowfiend131

    Locale: Colorado

    Thanks for all the comments.

    From Ike on the HMG Porter: "As far as weaknesses, a wraparound hip belt would do a much better job when carrying heavy loads."

    Not sure I follow you. How far around does the hipbelt go? I have a 30 inch waist, so most hipbelts wrap plenty around me.

    #1973726
    Dave G
    BPL Member

    @dapperdave

    If you imagine the base of a pack in cross-section to resemble a rectangle, the hip-belt attaches at the corners, forming sort of a semi-circle: A Wraparound hipbelt would attach closer to, but not at, the centre of the side contacting the back of your hip girdle(near or at the base of the stays), forming a shape closer to that of your hips and, in general, giving better load transfer.

    Hope that makes a bit of sense,

    Dave

    #1973736
    Ike Jutkowitz
    BPL Member

    @ike

    Locale: Central Michigan

    What Dave said.

    Don't get me wrong though. It is a great pack and well worth considering. I just don't like giving glowing reviews without presenting pros and cons.

    #1973772
    Luke Schmidt
    BPL Member

    @cameron

    Locale: Alaska

    If you don't like the HMG Porter another option would be a Zimmerbuilt custom pack. I have one of his packs and like it a lot but I think the HMG packs carry heavy loads better.

    If you want cheap pack look for the Jansport "Big Bear" pack. My brother picked up one for about $50 online and has carried some pretty heavy loads in it. It weighs about 4 pounds but that extra $350 could buy lots of other UL gear.

    #1973774
    Abraham Schlossberg
    BPL Member

    @ernda

    Locale: Southern California

    Osprey volt 75 weighs 3lbs 12oz (manufacturers specs), supposed to go to 50 lbs of carry or so and very adjustable. Only costs $200 before any discounts. Might look into that

    #1973792
    David Ure
    Member

    @familyguy

    Definitely consider the Porter 4400 or alternatively ask HMG to fabricate a Windrider 4400 for you. Great carry. I should note, however, that these are slim, tall packs that some folks don't care for (pack above your shoulders).

    On of the most comfortable 60L packs that I have used is the Granite Gear Nimbus Meridian. Better suspension than the blaze and custom shoulder harness and belt. The belt rotates and the shoulder straps will also rotate to your specific shoulder width. You can leave the top pocket at home and get it close to 3 lbs but that may be too heavy for you. Still, an excellent off the shelf carry.

    #1973900
    Chris .
    BPL Member

    @cwb

    Locale: Los Angeles

    I started backpacking with an Osprey Aether 70 and now use a Circuit and have a Blaze for a backup. I'd love to sell the Osprey but with four small kids I know I'm going to end up carrying way more than the other two will handle at some point. It's a good pack. Just heavy.

    #1973905
    Jason Elsworth
    Spectator

    @jephoto

    Locale: New Zealand

    http://www.elementalhorizons.com/aquilo-pack.aspx

    The Elemental Horizons Aquilo is 56 L in the main sack for a large. Not sure how well it carries 35lb. Not many people seem to have one, but those who do seem happy.

    A full Dyneema version is available as a custom.

    #1973911
    Chris Quinn
    BPL Member

    @cquinn

    Locale: North Queensland

    +1 for the Aquilo.

    I carried 40+ lb in mine on the Larrapinta trail, and it carried well. The harness is extremely comfortable. Matthew is happy to do custom work, and made my pack with strategically placed Dyneema panels. Great workmanship.

    Word is starting to get out about just how good these packs are for load hauling. ;)

    #1973918
    Jason Elsworth
    Spectator

    @jephoto

    Locale: New Zealand

    @Chris. That's good to hear. I am seriously considering one of these as a family trips pack.

    #1974245
    Michael K
    BPL Member

    @chinookhead

    If you want, I can sell you my Golite terrono 90L in a large for the price for which I bought it or I will return it this week. This is a relatively light load hauler. It is extremely comfortable and it has an even stiffer center stay and rail system than the new GoLite Quests. Therefore, I think it will do better with 50 + pounds than my Quest 80L. The Terrono also has a much wider and stiffer belt. You can see the great review that Backpacker gave it here:
    http://www.backpacker.com/fall-winter-gear-guide-2011-gear-review-golite-terrono-90/gear/15889
    and its specs here:
    http://www.golite.com/Ms-Terrono-90L-P958.aspx
    a video here:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmVumgu9AsY

    I am only returning the Terrono because the hip belt was too big for my skinny body. I need a medium. Please tell me if you want it soon for 99 dollars (the retail price) because I only used it once so GoLite offered to let me exchange it for the retail price. I hope my size medium Quest 80L works out because it has a much more flexible frame than what I'm used to for a big load hauler.

    #1974976
    David Ure
    Member

    @familyguy

    "From Ike on the HMG Porter: "As far as weaknesses, a wraparound hip belt would do a much better job when carrying heavy loads."

    Not sure I understand this comment. The Porter does have a wrap around belt, secured by tensioning straps that pull the entire bottom of the pack (lumbar and side) into the belt. It effectively secures the stays to the belt.

    #1974984
    Ike Jutkowitz
    BPL Member

    @ike

    Locale: Central Michigan

    Dave,
    I couldn't find a picture of my pack to illustrate what I mean, but I'll try to describe it. The expedition is a relatively wide pack (or I am relatively narrow waisted). The wings of the hipbelt attach directly to the ends of the pack. When the pack is tightly packed, the back panel becomes semi rigid and convex.

    belt
    From the HMG website. Note where the hipbelt wings attach and the rounded shape of the lower pack.

    This means that I have to really tighten down the belt to have that backpanel conform to my back or else it tends to want to gap at the two back corners. The hipbelt wings are also relatively shapeless, and between these two features, I may need to adjust the hipbelt periodically. I'd prefer a hipbelt closer to my old granite gear vapor trail.

    Again, all in all though, I am extremely happy with this pack.

    #1974992
    David Ure
    Member

    @familyguy

    Gotcha. Thanks for clarifying.

    #3473134
    Ben R
    BPL Member

    @snowfiend131

    Locale: Colorado

    Long term follow-up, in case others searching for a similar solution stumble on this thread:

    Tried a Deuter Act Lite, and it was just OK, returned it.  Comfortable, nice torso size adjustment, a bit too heavy, a bit too small a volume, storing tent on top of the pack made it way too tall, no good way to store tent on the side of pack, and a hipbelt pocket on only one side (at the time, looks like newer packs have two).

    Tried an HMG Porter 4400, didn’t like it, returned it.  Its a very narrow pack, the only way you get the volume is to use the giant extension collar, making a super tall pack, which is not my preference.  Also didn’t find it very comfortable, with a less robust frame and hipbelt than I was used to (at the time, newer packs may have an updated design).  Also no exterior pockets, although that can be solved with add-ons.

    Contacted ULA about a big volume pack, they offered me a “Air-X with Catalyst frame”.  The Air-X had a stated volume similar to the Catalyst, but when the blow up air frame is replaced with a low volume foam/stay frame, there was significantly more room (~4300 cubic inches in the main bag).  I purchased and used for a couple seasons.  I liked it – good volume, wide instead of tall, had pockets and tent storage options like I was used to.  However, as my carry weights crept up (bigger kid clothes, more food for more than 1 night, etc.), I found the pack couldn’t handle loads above 40 lbs very well.  The hipbelt slipped constantly, and tightening it more made my hips hurt.  I now have posted this pack for sale here.

    Final solution was a Seek Outside Unaweep 6300.  Huge, good external storage pockets and straps, wide and not super tall, and can handle as much weight as I am willing to carry (usually around 45 lbs on typical trips).  Light for its size and capability at just over 4 lb.  IMO, the perfect family hiking pack.  I still manage to stuff it pretty full when loaded up with warm gear for four people, and it shrinks down nicely when I don’t need all the volume.  I still haven’t found hipbelt pockets for it that I like (have Zimmerbuilts, they are a bit too small).

    Easier solution from the beginning would have been to just get a 7lb monster load hauler from REI.  But I’m pleased that in the end I got a pack that meets my needs and saves me a few pounds.

    #3473306
    CARLOS C.
    BPL Member

    @lamboy

    Locale: Mid Atlantic

    I think you should seriously look into and consider the Seekoutside Divide 4500.

    I just purchased one for the very same reasons you stated plus winter use.

    #3473311
    Jim C
    BPL Member

    @jimothy

    Locale: Georgia, USA

    If 68 liters is sufficient, you may want to look into the Gregory Paragron 68. I recently got the 58 liter version for trips where I play the pack mule for the family, and while I haven’t gotten a lot of use out of it, it’s been comfortable so far. In particular, it really sticks to my lumbar and keeps the weight on my hips. The 68 liter is just under 4 lbs (3.9 lbs, according to Gregory). I assume that weight includes the included day pack (which also serves as a hydration bladder holder), raincover, and sleeping bag divider. Removing those shaves off a hair less than half a pound, if my memory serves me.

    $250 for the 68 liter version, and if you time your purchase well, you can get it for $200 with a 20% off coupon. In fact, Massdrop has them on sale now for $180 for the 68 liter. (Disclaimer: that link includes my referral code). According to Massdrop, stripped weight is 3 lbs 5 oz.

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 27 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...