Topic

How safe is your food? Investigating the effectiveness of odor-proof bags


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums General Forums General Lightweight Backpacking Discussion How safe is your food? Investigating the effectiveness of odor-proof bags

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 23 posts - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1299646
    Ike Jutkowitz
    BPL Member

    @ike

    Locale: Central Michigan

    In December, we completed a randomized, blinded, and controlled study investigating the effectiveness of odor-proof bags using a trained K9 model. Unfortunately, the topic does not appear to be of interest to BPL. Because the police handlers freely gave of their time for this study, I would like to see it formally published rather than just posted. This type of publicity/outreach is important to these underfunded departments. I don't read any other outdoor magazines- Does anyone know of a magazine that would find this type of study interesting/publishable?

    #1958035
    Greg Mihalik
    Spectator

    @greg23

    Locale: Colorado

    "Unfortunately, the topic does not appear to be of interest to BPL."

    Based on what?

    I personally sold 400 NyloFume bags here on BPL for the purpose of odor-proofing and waterproofing. I believe another 200 to 300 were distributed by others here. Now some UL sites offer them as a standard item.

    There have been a number of posts reporting the effectiveness of OP bags in "backyard" setting with a high critter and bear population.

    Try poking around a bit before dismissing apparent interest.

    #1958036
    BlackHatGuy
    Spectator

    @sleeping

    Locale: The Cascades

    I'd try:

    AMC (the magazine of the Appalachian Mountain Club)
    Backpacker magazine
    Outside magazine

    If none of these are interested, just do a search for outdoor magazines, there are a bunch: Field and Stream, Bowhunter, Outdoor Life, Trailrunner, etc.

    #1958039
    Ken Thompson
    BPL Member

    @here

    Locale: Right there

    "Unfortunately, the topic does not appear to be of interest to BPL."

    Did RJ turn you down? Seems like they need content very badly. Or is it that it does not pay?

    They sell turkey bags up here by the case. Very important to keep all your weed from stinking up the place. Really. I hate it when one food item flavors everything else in your food bag.

    We got bears and coons here. They smell everything.

    #1958041
    BlackHatGuy
    Spectator

    @sleeping

    Locale: The Cascades

    Another thought – especially since it's your local police dept. – is there a Sunday supplement magazine in your local paper/next big city paper? They'd probably be interested just for the local angle and the department would get lots of local exposure that way.

    #1958042
    Ike Jutkowitz
    BPL Member

    @ike

    Locale: Central Michigan

    Greg,
    I'm fairly well in tune with the forums. I was referring to the editors of BPL. I had submitted the proposal almost three months ago but had not received acknowledgement of submission or subsequent inquiry. Didn't know if the topic was too controversial.

    Thanks for the suggestions, Doug.

    edit- I may not have been so smart in the way I phrased the original question. For clarification, I was wondering (1) if odor-proof bags were a mainstream concept or more of an UL mindset and (2) if there were any outdoor magazines that had an interest in original research related to, but not necessarily about, backpacking. Backpacking? Outside? Is one better than the other? I am not interested in critiquing the editorship here and respect their right to select articles in line with BPL philosophy. I hope people will refrain from taking this thread down that path. Thanks!

    #1958044
    Greg Mihalik
    Spectator

    @greg23

    Locale: Colorado

    "…BPL…but had not received acknowledgement of submission or subsequent inquiry."

    Thanks for that attempt. "BPL staff" responsiveness is notoriously lacking. Hopefully someone else can help in that regard. Or perhaps a PM to Roger Caffin would provide a path.

    There Is interest and your work would be greatly appreciated.

    #1958055
    Jerry Adams
    BPL Member

    @retiredjerry

    Locale: Oregon and Washington

    "I had submitted the proposal about three months ago but had not received acknowledgement of submission or subsequent inquiry. Didn't know if the topic was too controversial."

    Editors = Ryan

    Ryan is busy. Don't assume it was rejected for any reason.

    Ryan should hire Addie back : )

    #1958110
    Ike Jutkowitz
    BPL Member

    @ike

    Locale: Central Michigan

    Thanks guys. This was my first lay publication submission. Guess I'm just used to the formal review process of scientific journals. In any event, I will post an update as the project develops. Next month we'll be completing a larger 14 dog trial of both resealable and Mylar heat sealable bags (with more of a law enforcement focus for that one). Fun stuff getting to watch the dogs at work, and much different than my normal day to day job.

    #1958118
    Travis Leanna
    BPL Member

    @t-l

    Locale: Wisconsin

    I'd be interested in the study.

    #1958129
    Greg Mihalik
    Spectator

    @greg23

    Locale: Colorado

    "…trial of both resealable and Mylar heat sealable bags…"

    Ike,
    Just a suggestion – Please include the generic material names of the bags – nylon, polyester, etc.

    Thanks.

    #1958147
    Konrad .
    BPL Member

    @konrad1013

    I am much much more interested in this article than another typical review of a 2-3lb mass produced backpack. Trained k-9s?? a controlled setting? Awesome!!!

    #1958226
    steven franchuk
    Member

    @surf

    Mark me as also interested.

    #1958486
    Jim H
    BPL Member

    @jraiderguy

    Locale: Bay Area

    I've never bothered with odor-proof bags in the past, always just stuffing the bear canister and setting it far from camp. They've gotten knocked around, but never breached. Since learning about the LW/UL world, I've been thinking about whether it would be better to attempt odor-proofing. On one hand, maybe my canister wouldn't be molested so much in the Sierras or Cascades, but on the other hand, it might make that tube of chapstick that fell to the bottom of my pack the new smelliest thing in camp. Long-winded way of saying that this sounds like an interesting read and very useful info.

    #1958500
    Stephen Barber
    BPL Member

    @grampa

    Locale: SoCal

    I'd be very interested in the article! Please PM Roger Caffin – you'll get better odds of getting a reply!

    Otherwise, I'd be happy to see this posted anywhere I could access it.

    #1958617
    Bean
    BPL Member

    @stupendous-2

    Locale: California

    Damnit, I was really excited to read this thread… which I guess essentially doesn't exist.

    Maybe I'll perform my own highly unscientific study using my own dog and some Snausages (just typing Snausages he came over and started smelling around my keyboard).

    #1958624
    Ryan Smith
    BPL Member

    @violentgreen

    Locale: East TN

    Ike,

    I would love to read an article on this. There has been a lot of discussion on this topic over the last few years with no consensus on effectiveness reached.

    Ryan

    #1958645
    Ike Jutkowitz
    BPL Member

    @ike

    Locale: Central Michigan

    Sorry guys. I did not mean this as a tease. The study was performed with the BPL audience in mind, and we had a great time doing it. A form letter acknowledging receipt of the proposal and stating that it was under review would have gone a long way towards alleviating the perception of "rejection" after a significant length of time had passed.

    The many positive responses I've received have reinforced the feeling that this study belongs on BPL and I fully appreciate the staffing limitations of the editorship. I'll hang in there and go through whatever other channels may be available. Whatever the final disposition, I won't leave you hanging. The vagueness with regards to results has of course been intentional. I won't "scoop" our own story before it is published.

    #1959481
    Diane Pinkers
    BPL Member

    @dipink

    Locale: Western Washington

    Count me in as interested in your study. If no love from BPL, Seattle Backpackers on-line magazine would possibly be interested.

    http://seattlebackpackersmagazine.com/

    People who write novels for a living often have a drawer full of rejection letters. Be persistent, I'd bet your post went astray or got buried.

    #1959485
    Stephen M
    BPL Member

    @stephen-m

    Locale: Way up North

    Hi Ike,

    I also would be very interested in this article if it managed to make its way on to BPL.

    Keep up the good work.

    #1959490
    Charles P
    Spectator

    @mediauras

    Locale: Terra

    TrailGroove magazine, a cool online backpacking magazine with UL leanings would be a nice spot for the story. Sounds like a great piece!

    #1959509
    Bob Bankhead
    BPL Member

    @wandering_bob

    Locale: Oregon, USA

    From their website's Contact Us:

    email us at [email protected]

    Mailing Address:

    TrailGroove Magazine
    PO Box 1064
    Lander, WY 82520

    Aaron & Jen:
    Founders
    [email protected]
    [email protected]

    #1959512
    Bob Bankhead
    BPL Member

    @wandering_bob

    Locale: Oregon, USA

    From their website's Contact

    Comments, Gear Reviews, Advertising or anything at all………..Give us about 10 minutes to get back to you.

    [email protected]

    Or just give us a call (425) 954-7116

Viewing 23 posts - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...