Topic

Lightning Ascent – women’s vs men’s


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums General Forums Winter Hiking Lightning Ascent – women’s vs men’s

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1296069
    Charles P
    Spectator

    @mediauras

    Locale: Terra

    Hi. In David Chenault's latest (well-done) article on human-powered snow travel, he made a big recommendation for choosing the narrower women's ascent over the men's. The argument, which is sound, was that the narrower shoe would make for a more normal gate while snowshoeing.

    Question: has anybody gone this route? Seems like the biggest potential disadvantage is less flotation. Any thoughts on this?

    #1929022
    Scott Ireland
    BPL Member

    @winterwarlock

    Locale: Western NY

    Thought the Lightning were super for flotation anyway. Yes, they provide some, but their bigger advantage is traction on relatively packed trails. If float is your bigger concern, I'd consider something like the Atlas 10 or 12 series….

    #1929054
    Yes 1000
    Spectator

    @mamamia

    How does it work if we chose to get the Womens snowshoe but size up by one unit. Eg: Going by weight I need a 22" Mens snowshoe. I'm thinking to go with 25" womens to compensate for the loss of flotation. Thoughts?

    #1929061
    Scott Ireland
    BPL Member

    @winterwarlock

    Locale: Western NY

    but one other thought occurred to me. The decking / binding / crampon used to have issues with reliability (if you want I can find some loooong threads on ADKHighPeaks forum about this). Anyway. I'd ink that if you chose the narrower ones for your weight, there'd be additional stress on that point, since the moment arm would be shorter.

    #1929098
    dan mchale
    BPL Member

    @wildlife

    Locale: Cascadia

    Being a cross-country skier I opted for the narrow ones too – did that when they first hit the shelves.

    #1929505
    Yes 1000
    Spectator

    @mamamia

    Dan, 3 inches is not a big deal when you consider 22"-25" snowshoes. In my neck of the woods(Cascades Oregon and Washinton) where its more of concrete snow, everyone suggests to go with MSR lightening. But I also plan to use this in dry now ( East of Oregon).

    Can you please share your opinion if it helped you, going with women's snowshoe with extra length.

    #1929527
    David Chenault
    BPL Member

    @davec

    Locale: Queen City, MT

    That extra 3 inches of length really isn't a huge deal one way or the other. You'll gain a bit of float, a bit of weight, and lose a tiny bit of maneuverability.

    Bigger snowshoes will float better, but honestly snowshoeing in deep light snow is not fun. Has to be done sometimes, but I always wish I had skis.

    #1929713
    Yes 1000
    Spectator

    @mamamia

    Thanks David, I think going with Women's snowshoe with 3" of additional length makes sense.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...