Jun 29, 2012 at 3:04 pm #1291510
@daviddrakeLocale: North Idaho
Not sure I would have drawn the same conclusion as the author.Jun 29, 2012 at 3:58 pm #1891127
@ngatelLocale: Southern California
Everyone has to make their own conclusions/decisions. Can't fault them for that, even if we would do different ourselves.Jun 29, 2012 at 8:14 pm #1891169
Potential hazards of solo travel are innumerable.
The rewards of solitude are likewise beyond numerical expression.
Something happens when you are alone in "lonely" country that is diffcult to express.
I love the times I have shared with companions on the trail and they were full, rich experiences i treasure.
Then there are the solo times which are intense on a whole different level and I treasure them too.
I don't think fear of what could happen, alone out there, should be the driving factor in any decision.
The risk of solo travel is ALWAYS worth taking.Jun 29, 2012 at 10:23 pm #1891189
…Jun 30, 2012 at 10:08 am #1891210
@socal-nomadLocale: North San Diego county
The person who penned this real life changing experience was loose rock scrambling with light climbing up cliffs with chimneys from what I read in the story.
I like solo hiking and backpacking but I pick my routes carefully and able to scout ahead for danger and able to change my route so I don't put myself in the position I don't return. Sure solo hiking has it risk but it more of a risk to drive a car or ride bicycle along side the road.
Life is a risk if you don't take risks you may miss out on the fun things in life.
TerryJun 30, 2012 at 3:57 pm #1891242
@cohikerLocale: San Isabel NF
I'm with Terry, living your life ruled by 'what ifs' is not a life well lived.
My sarcastic-to-a-fault mind immediately read the trigger of the incident and thought "Well, if you were hiking alone you wouldn't have turned around to look for the friend, and never brushed the boulder. Accident avoided."
I know, it's flippant and insensitive, but in my mind, it illustrates the same point: Everything you do causes ripples in what might or might not happen in the future. Avoid unnecessary risks, but realize that you can't control everything, even sitting on your couch. Go have fun.
To play Devil's Advocate: It's entirely possible that if hiking alone, she might have never touched the boulder, made the loop an hour faster and been just in time to get smeared by a semi on the way home.Jun 30, 2012 at 6:25 pm #1891256
Could have also squashed the author like a bug and we would have no article to tear apart. That would be tragic.Jul 9, 2012 at 9:41 am #1893340
@asciibaronLocale: Mid Atlantic
many people find they can not stand themselves and use incidents like this to mask that truth.Jul 9, 2012 at 11:31 am #1893368
In the same way that the author draw the conclusion that hiking alone is dangerous…… I was in a similar situation while hiking in a cave with a group. We were climbing a talus slope and one of the others in the group was following too close behind me when a boulder moved as I lightly touched it causing it to move and temporarily pinning him in an identical manner described in this story. In my companions case he could have written that it's more dangerous to go with a group.Jul 12, 2012 at 5:59 am #1894220
The chance of an an accident or injury increases proportionally with the size of the group so solo walking is safer than walking with a group. What changes with a group is the response to an accident.Jul 12, 2012 at 8:59 am #1894245
@asciibaronLocale: Mid Atlantic
given what i experienced with a group i was new to, i would have to agree with Mark. there are some people who are a liability and it's not a matter of if but when with them. i'd rather not be around when their time is up.Jul 12, 2012 at 9:54 am #1894261
@retiredjerryLocale: Oregon and Washington
If I'm solo I tend to be a little more careful – no one to bail me out
If I'm going with someone else, I'll do riskier stream crossings and stuff
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.