Topic

Not another pot thread


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) Not another pot thread

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 19 posts - 26 through 44 (of 44 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1892801
    M B
    BPL Member

    @livingontheroad

    My pot requirements

    Folding handle, no sharp edges to damage pack, liner, expensive gear
    Must be able to be picked up and poured with ONE hand. Period.
    Must not need protection to prevent being crushed like a beer can.

    The grease pot is cheap, but if you have to buy and bring a pot lifter, you are just wasting your time with it. Dont think you can just grab a boiling pot off of a stove with a bandana either, you will scald yourself or set the bandana on fire eventually.

    Some things arent worth the trouble. The grease pot is one of them.

    $60 for evernew 1.3L with folding handles, pour spout. Well worth it at ~4.5oz
    holds my stove/support, windscreen, firestarter, lighter, matches and 2 -12oz styrofoam coffee cups with lids (0.1oz each) which stay protected from damage. A couple of rubber bands holds the lid on securely in the pack.

    #1892805
    Ken Thompson
    BPL Member

    @here

    Locale: Right there

    If you take care of your gear a pot will last the rest of your life and someone else's. Choose wisely, buy once. A lifetime of use from a pot is less than pennies per day. Buying quality gear only stings once.

    I went with the Evernew 750ml Past Pot and could not be happier. For me it is perfect.

    #1892811
    john hansford
    BPL Member

    @johnh1

    " if you have to buy and bring a pot lifter, you are just wasting your time with it. Dont think you can just grab a boiling pot off of a stove with a bandana either, you will scald yourself or set the bandana on fire eventually "

    Pot grabber = no burnt fingers, clean hands

    How do you lift a pot off an Inferno stove with flames licking up the handles?

    By removing the handles you save 0.5 oz, making the extra only 0.75 oz for an Open Country grabber.

    #1892824
    Dale Wambaugh
    BPL Member

    @dwambaugh

    Locale: Pacific Northwest

    Okay, we do get down to grams, but geez, I want to move a pot full of boiling water without scalding myself, particularly up the side of a mountain somewhere. I've scalded myself in the kitchen, getting a second degree burn in the process and it *hurt*. Drop a liter of boiling water on your foot or leg and good luck walking out.

    If you have a small pot with handles, a bandanna isn't too bad and better if the flame is out and it isn't boiling over. For a handle-less pot or a pot set a good ol' pot grabber works well and isn't that heavy. I would assume that anyone cooking with larger pots is cooking for a group and the weight can be shared. I don't mind an ounce for a truly functional piece of gear that will be used a couple times a day and promotes safety.

    An Open Country pot grabber is 1.2oz and $4 at REI. The fancier looking MSR Pandhandler is functionally identical to the Open Country model and weighs 1.6oz, costs $8-$10 and comes with a cloth sack. The MSR Lite Lifter is reported as 1oz and will set you back $12-$15 (ouch).

    Or you can leave the handles on your pot.

    #1892829
    Ken Thompson
    BPL Member

    @here

    Locale: Right there

    I've seen Cameron pull his titanium pot off his bushbuddy stove bare handed by always grabbing above the waterline at the rim. Advantage taken of titaniums poorer heat transfer. No handles. No pot holder.

    I use a cone. I like handles. Always bare handed too.

    #1892831
    M B
    BPL Member

    @livingontheroad

    pot lifters let you pick it up.

    I wouldnt try pouring into a freezer bag my kid is holding open usinig them. Simply not made to do it.

    The handles on the evernew pot DO let you do this, safely, in control, easily. They are cool to touch.

    They dont get hot, at all. My stove heats the bottom of my pot, perfectly. I do not have wild flames engulfing the pot like some do that are obsessed with heating up 1 min faster and use supercat style stove.

    I tried the grease pot. From experience I say, simply not worth the hassle for me. Best $60 I ever spent was to get away from that thing. Made cooking much easier.

    #1892837
    Tim Zen
    Spectator

    @asdzxc57

    Locale: MI

    vargo 500 ml sierra cup with integral folding handle at 80 grams.
    The windscreen / pot holder is a cylinder.

    (Can the censor software do something about Dinty Moore?)

    #1892845
    Sam M
    Member

    @samw51

    I'm also looking for a pot for myself. I plan to do mostly pouch cooking, but want the flexibility to cook in the pot too. I'm considering:

    Stanco Grease Pot (1.3 l, 3.7 ounces)

    Anti Gravity Gear – non-stick (.7 liters, 3.8 ounces)

    Open Country 3 cup pot – hard anodized aluminum (.7 liters, 3.8 ounces)
    Open Country 2 quart pot – hard anodized aluminum (1.5 Liters, 5.9 ounces)

    Any rec's?

    #1892856
    Jon Fong / Flat Cat Gear
    BPL Member

    @jonfong

    Locale: FLAT CAT GEAR

    If you are ONLY boiling water for re-hydration, an anodized aluminum pot will be fine. I find that aluminum pots tend to be more fuel efficient than titanium pots. I suspect that this has to do with the amount of heat transfer up the sidewalls.

    If you are boiling and COOK in your pot, I would recommend a bare titanium pot. I find that the coatings on aluminum pots are not very robust. They scratch easily and you have to be carefully cleaning and packing them. With titanium on the other hand, I have cleaned them out with a sand/water slurry and I never worry about scratches while cleaning or packing.

    With the 850 ml pot on Backcountry.com at $28, the difference between a good anodized pot and titanium are minimal. If your set on aluminum, I agree with others that the Antigravity gear 3 cupper is pretty nice and is also a good price. Best regards – Jon

    #1892946
    Bob Gross
    BPL Member

    @b-g-2-2

    Locale: Silicon Valley

    Geez, guys, I never use a pot grabber, and my cook pot has no handles. It has a single stainless steel wire bail.

    –B.G.–

    #1892949
    James Klein
    BPL Member

    @jnklein21

    Locale: Southeast

    "The grease pot is cheap, but if you have to buy and bring a pot lifter, you are just wasting your time with it."
    Why b/c it makes it heavier? More spendy? I guess more fiddley??

    IMO, the greasepot is an excellent value. I use a pan pie lid for mine and cut the weight down to something like 2.5oz.

    I use a canister stove and don't bring water to a full boil but I find that my gloves/mittens (doubled up if I am using lighter ones) are more than sufficient for grabbing/pouring water. Thumb goes over top lip and fingers cradle the bottom. I would feel comfortable doing this with a bandana also. I have considered adding a bail to make this even easier.

    I also have the olicamp htx pot with handles – haven't camped with it yet. While nice I have consider doing away the handles b/c I think the above method works well enough.

    The imusa mug has a non folding handle for those who are worried about a bandana/glove grab. It also is very cheap, though of course is slightly harder to pack and you'll have to come up with a lid…though for me the packing complexity would be well worth the saved $50….
    http://www.end2endtrailsupply.com/Imusa_Mugs.html

    #1892966
    Simon Wurster
    BPL Member

    @einstein

    Locale: Big Apple

    I've done over a hundred alcohol stove tests (54 in the last 2 months), and my aluminum pots never performed as well as the titanium ones. And believe me, I wanted them to do better!

    In my tests the average boil for aluminum was 7:27 (6 tests, 2 pots), and the average boil for titanium was 6:40 (31 tests, 7 pots), which is a 47 second advantage over aluminum.

    I believe this has to do with thickness of titanium pots (very thin) vs. the aluminum pots (more than 4X thicker?). Sure, aluminum as an element conducts heat better, but a titanium pot transfers heat better because it's so thin. And as others have mentioned, you can beat the crap out of them, scrub them with a Roto-Stripper (just kidding), use them in an inferno wood fire, and they just keep working. To paraphrase the Patek Phillipe slogan "You never actually own a titanium vessel. You merely look after it for the next generation."

    #1892970
    David Thomas
    BPL Member

    @davidinkenai

    Locale: North Woods. Far North.

    Al vs Ti over these thicknesses doesn't matter for heat conductivity. All the heat transfer resistance is primarily in the air film on the outside and secondarily in the water boundary layer on the inside.

    If, as mentioned by others, you're concerned about HX along the material, yes there will be a difference. That relates to a hotter/cooler freeboard above the liquid and avoiding scrotching foods on hot spots in thin, less conductivity materials.

    If you're seeing a difference in boil times in the same dimensioned pots, look to the color/coating on the outside. Anything painted or anodized will absorb (and emit) more infrared (good on the Bottom which sees the hot flames, bad on the sides which see the cold surroundings). Bare, shiny metal absorbs and emits very little infrared.

    Edited to fix iPad typing errors.

    #1892988
    Sam M
    Member

    @samw51

    Steep and Cheap has a Stoic titanium (with non-stick) pot set for sale for $54. I only want the 1.3L pot and not the 1.6L pot. Anyone care to split it down the middle with me? (assuming it reappears on steep and cheap).

    the same set is here for $20 more: http://www.backcountry.com/stoic-ti-1.6l-pot-1.3l-pot-set

    #1893107
    Eric Blumensaadt
    BPL Member

    @danepacker

    Locale: Mojave Desert

    LIGHTNESS> To be as light as aluminum pot Ti has to be quite thin.

    COOKING EASE>
    1. Ti does not conduct heat nearly as well as aluminum
    2. thin Ti is even worse in heat conductivity
    3. Thus thin Ti WILL have a center hot spot that can burn if you are actually cooking, not just boiling water.

    I vote for aluminum, either anodized or non-stick coated (and I save money).

    #1893109
    Alex H
    BPL Member

    @abhitt

    Locale: southern appalachians or desert SW

    +1 to what Eric said.

    #1893190
    Walter Carrington
    BPL Member

    @snowleopard

    Locale: Mass.

    For cooking, a thicker aluminum pot will be better, either non-stick or hard anodized.
    Cooking acidic foods in aluminum will corrode the aluminum and give the food a metallic taste unless it's non-stick or anodized. Titanium is pretty inert so this won't happen with Ti.

    For just boiling water or cooking pasta, I don't think it matters much what you use. Take your pick based on weight and shape.

    #1896631
    A.H
    BPL Member

    @anubis

    What are the good brands of aluminum pots?

    #1896633
    John Donewar
    BPL Member

    @newton

    Locale: Southeastern Texas

    Arthur,

    3 cup HAA pot

    http://www.traildesigns.com/cookware/open-country-3-cup-hard-anodized-pot

    It has no handles so you need some type of pot lifter. The lid has a D ring of sorts that folds over flat.

    $15.95, 3 cup capacity, 2.625" x 5.375" and 3.8oz

    Are you looking for durable, light, cheap or SUL?

    Party On,

    Newton

Viewing 19 posts - 26 through 44 (of 44 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...