Topic
De-Lorme PN-60w GPS ProsCons (with InReach)
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › De-Lorme PN-60w GPS ProsCons (with InReach)
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 19, 2012 at 4:50 am #1290077
Is anyone using this GPS?
I am considering purchasing one because it pairs with the new inReach personal locator device which I am considering against the the Spot device.
inReach – http://www.inreachcanada.com/inreach-overview/
Spot – http://www.findmespot.ca/en/The practicality of this GPS would go a long way to determining which locator device I chose.
Thanks in advance
Derrick
May 19, 2012 at 7:41 am #1879206I'm buying an inreach soon, but I'm hoping for the iOS version. Otherwise I'll pair it with an Android without service or perhaps prepay service. I can't see having both cell and GPS on the trail.
The screens on the phones are bigger than the PN-60w which is important when looking at maps. Downside of phone is lack of true GPS elevation – it is derived from GPS Lat-Lon and a topo. Also battery life.
I may be wrong, but texts from the PN-60w require a funky character selection process even worse than the three letter per key phone method. Touch screens are SO much easier. And the price????? really outrageous at $300+.
Oh yeah, the SPOT works poorly in forests and canyons.
May 19, 2012 at 8:25 am #1879217I carried the PN-60w and associated version of SPOT on the CDT last year, so had quite a lot of experience with it — the CDT is in general a trail where a person is more inclined to use a GPS than most. And I put a SPOT location on my trail journal twice a day.
Downsides:
I personally found that trying to get all of the CDT onto two separate SD cards to be a PITA using the DeLorme system; slow, geeky, problems along the way. The attempt at putting aerial imagery for along the trail — which seemed like a great advantage — was so slow and painful and turned up bugs. I never used it, sticking almost exclusively to the USGS imagery (which matched my paper maps) where I had guessed right about where the trail went when I was downloading stuff ahead of time.
This shouldn't be as big an issue for people not doing long journeys, however.
I just am not a fan, though, of the subscription model of downloading maps.The software interface to load maps was something that I found really complicated. I used to be a software developer, so I usually don't shy away from software complexities. This was one of those cases where it feels like you have to take a bit of time to learn the specific mental mindset of the person who designed the Garmin software in order to get it to work. A lot of power at your fingertips, but too much of the associated complexity exposed in cases where you just want to do most-common tasks.
No touch controls, and yes, doing a text message is thus a little tedious, especially with the pretty limited character count per message. This was another good idea in theory that in practice I almost never used; I just really didn't have much inclination to send very short texts that took a bit of time and effort to send out. But for something important it's not that big a deal once in a great while to send one.
I can't compare battery life to other units; I used almost exclusively lithiums FWIW. I never kept it on for long at one time, with a couple "am I really on the right track?" exceptions. The SPOT device had really good battery life; I used it twice daily and didn't change batteries until well over halfway along, i.e., well over two months.
I'm not really a fan of pairing a dedicated SPOT device to this specific GPS. There will be situations where, owning a SPOT, I might like to bring it along but not bring this GPS (the GPS in my smartphone is typically plenty, the CDT was a bit of an exception). But this special version of SPOT requires the GPS to work for anything but emergency SOS signalling.
Upsides:
I loved the screen. I could see mine on sunny days, whereas a friend with a Garmin was always having to try to shade the screen so he could see anything.
It's a tough unit. Absolutely reliable over five months of continuous use. Very possibly saved my butt in a near white-out in southern Colorado. If not waterproof, then good enough; I did keep it in a kind of case on the shoulder strap of my pack, but not a waterproof one. The unit spent a fair bit of time being wet with no issues.
I felt that it locked on really well, have no complaints there. It can be nice to have more than one type of map to look at but again, in practice I rarely did this. In other circumstances I might.
Bottom line: if you don't mind the Garmin approach to buying map data, and you can manage to load maps onto your unit without too much tedium and frustration, I think it's a great unit.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.