Feb 17, 2012 at 12:18 pm #1285797
You may have heard of Melvin Forbes' and/or his company New Ultra Light Arms. Melvin makes top-notch lightweight mountain rifles, but with a starting price of $3k, his products are out of reach for most folks.
Melvin recently joined up with a Maine-based manufacturer (Titan Machine Products) to form a new company that is making a production version of the NULA model 24. The Forbes Rifle model 24B differs from the NULA in that it uses an E.R. Shaw barrel instead of a custom Douglas, and the manufacturing and assembly are performed by Titan instead of Melvin himself (one exception being the stock, which is still manufactured by Melvin).
The weight with included scope rings is 5 lbs. 4 oz. MSRP is $1,400. You can get it in any caliber you like, as long as it's .270 or .30-06.
They have a website at http://www.forbesriflellc.com, but you'll find a little more info in the American Rifleman review:
I know there are lighter rifles available, but everything I've seen is way more expensive and not available in long action calibers.
I have no affiliation with any of these folks other than having one on order. Loaded with three rounds and topped with a Swaro 3-9×36, it should weigh just under 6-1/4 lbs. Having carried a 10 lb. .45-70 around for the last few years, I'm psyched.Feb 17, 2012 at 12:45 pm #1840853
@davidinkenaiLocale: North Woods. Far North.
10 pounds is a lot to carry and .45-70 isn't so versatile for long-range shots like mountain sheep and goats. A .30-06 can do just about anything you want a rifle to do in North America.
Just for comparison: dropping four pounds of rifle weight for $1400 seems in the same ballpark as people spending $200-$400 for a backpack or sleeping bag that weighs a pound less.
My approach: I let my hunter friends know I'm a heck of a sherpa. No one wants a whole elk or moose all at once so they get the bragging rights, I get some exercise and 100 pound of meat in the freeze.Feb 17, 2012 at 1:51 pm #1840879
The .30-06 is probably the king of versatility (and that was my choice for the Forbes), but I wouldn't say the .45-70 isn't versatile. The case capacity allows for a very wide range of loads, and you might be surprised at how flat it can shoot – 200 yd. PBR with a 300 grain pill. It excels in dense brush like the Oregon coast range, which I happen to live near, and it produces very little meat damage. I'm a big fan of the cartridge, and lever actions in general, but you're absolutely right that it doesn't make sense for a lightweight mountain rifle.Feb 17, 2012 at 2:13 pm #1840893
@owareLocale: Steptoe Butte
"Meat's In The Freezer ( Let's Go Skiing) "Mar 18, 2012 at 7:34 am #1855458
Who did you order from and what is the price?
About 10 years ago, I ordered one of the Colt Ultralight rifles in .270 Win and was very disappointed with the quality. Surely, this will be a much better effort.
David Petzal previously recommended the Colt version of Forbes ULA rifle and it was his mention in the latest Field & Stream magazine that brought the new Forbes rifle to my attention. In the recent story, he was also giving positive mention to the new Ruger American Rifle and saying that it weighs only 6.25 pounds. I saw one of the Ruger rifles at a SCI show in January, and its bolt was almost large enough to use as a boat anchor and the plastic stock was atrocious. I'd be surprised if the reported weight is accurate for the Ruger.
Have you had a chance to physically inspected a production model of the rifle?
ThanksMar 18, 2012 at 10:32 am #1855526
I ordered mine from a local FFL after reading the early reviews in American Rifleman, Field and Stream, and 24hourcampfire. There's also a quick F&S snippet from Shot Show:
My price was right around $1200. I imagine you'd pay more from a store, though I do know Forbes offers a slightly lower wholesale price to dealers who order at least four rifles.
From everything I've read/heard/seen, this is an entirely different beast from the Colt rifle, mainly in that Melvin has retained full control over the venture. All parts are interchangeable with Melvin's own NULA model 24, and the stock is the same stock, built and supplied by Melvin. The differences are that the other parts are machined by Forbes LLC (Titan Machine Products under the hood), the barrel is an E.R. Shaw production barrel instead of a custom Douglas, and of course the caliber choices are limited.
They haven't shipped the first production units yet (the estimate they gave me was April), but given the dimensional compatibility with the NULA model 24, the fact that it's Melvin's stock and not a cheap knock-off, and Melvin's level of involvement in the venture, I'm reasonably positive I won't be disappointed.Oct 9, 2012 at 12:20 pm #1919546
Well, it took a lot longer than anticipated to get it, but I've had my rifle for about a month now. I can say without hesitation that it was worth the wait.
– Overall fit and finish are excellent. The action is tight and smooth, and the barrel is bedded the full length of the stock. It needed a thorough cleaning (particularly the cocking cam area of the bolt), but then so has every rifle I've ever owned.
– With a Swarovski Z3 3-9×36 mounted, the rifle balances just ahead of the action, which gives it great maneuverability, but still leaves enough weight out front to hold it steady in suboptimal firing positions.
– The single stage trigger has no discernible creep and a nice, crisp break. I believe it's adjustable, but mine came set right around 2 lb and feels fine for my purposes.
– Recoil feels more like a 9 lb rifle than a 6 lb one, and is a straight-back push, so it's easy to keep eyes on target after the shot breaks.
– After breaking in the barrel, it shoots right around 1/2 MOA from the bench. More importantly, the light weight doesn't hinder my ability to shoot accurately from field positions.
Overall, I'm very satisfied so far. I think at the price point, it's the best thing going in a lightweight mountain rifle.Oct 10, 2012 at 11:53 am #1919887
@davidadairLocale: West Dakota
Nice! But for heavens sake, John, keep in mind this is BPL. What we want to know is how the manufacturers claimed weight compares to your measured weight! Just kidding, it looks really good and sounds like it's a shooter too. Congratulations. And more congratulations for being able to stifle the urge to slap big optics on. That scope makes for a pretty package (if you are into rifle aesthetics -and of course we all are). Thanks for sharing.Oct 10, 2012 at 12:05 pm #1919894
Yeah, high-magnification optics, target turrets, and fist-sized bolt handles certainly have their place, but the Forbes sure isn't one of them.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.