Topic

Why are Platypus hydration bladders to popular here?


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums Gear Forums Gear (General) Why are Platypus hydration bladders to popular here?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 8 posts - 26 through 33 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1771977
    Scott Bentz
    BPL Member

    @scottbentz

    Locale: Southern California

    I think it has to do with the philosophy of the lightweight packer.

    Camelbacks are systems. They have packs you place them in so you can wear them. That makes them heavy. I have seen many a hiker use their 3L Camelback full of water strapped to the outside of their pack. If you just use the bladder and place it in or on top of your pack with a hose it is still a heavy option.

    Platypus are light and fold nice and small. I am like many here. I use a 1L bottle, such as a plastic WIDE mouth soda bottle that goes in a pocket on my pack. I refill as needed. The Platy stays folded up for later use. When I get to camp and I need more water, fill my soda bottle and my 1L Platy for dinner, etc.

    I had one develop a small leak on the side. Patched with those little Platy patches. I am sure it was from using it around granite surfaces.

    Scott

    #1772087
    Warren Greer
    Spectator

    @warrengreer

    Locale: SoCal

    I had a new 3L Camelback and it was just over seven ounces. A 3L Platy Hoser is 3.61 ounces. Sure, it's not as easy to get water into, but it's half the weight and has not presented any major issues for me. I like the hose. I find it easier to get at than taking a bottle out of a side pocket and then trying to get it back in.

    If you need water bottles, get a Gatorade or other similar bottle. They come free with some kind of liquid and are much lighter than Nalgene's or (most) other purpose-built containers. And of course the cost is right.

    As Conrad noted, the only thing that is bad about the hose is that you can't monitor your remaining water without taking your pack off. Not usually a problem for me though. -The small weight penalty to carry a bladder is offset by the ease of use for me. YMMV.

    #1772098
    David Ure
    Member

    @familyguy

    In two years, I have had three Platypus hydration systems fail on me.

    Although heavier, the MSR drom bags are far more durable and will accept hot drinks. The Platypus won't.

    #1772139
    Mark Dijkstra
    Member

    @markacd

    I'm surprised nobody here uses an Ortlieb bladder.
    I use a 4L Ortlieb bladder that weighs 131 gram/4.6 oz. That is only slightly heavier than 2 2L Platy's.
    My bladder is very durable. I've never had a problem with it while I've seen several Platypus bladders fail. My Ortlieb also functions as a very comfortable pillow.
    It has a big opening which makes it easy to fill and a small opening which can be used in combination with a hose or a gravity filter.
    Another advantage I think it has over Platypus bottles is that a Platy always makes the water taste differently whereas the water in my Ortlieb tastes the way it came from the spring.
    The final reason I bougt my Ortlieb was the price. I don't know what the prices are in the rest of the world, but here in Europe a 4L Ortlieb costs about €20 while a 2L Platy costs abbout €15. Seeing as I often need capacity for more than 2L the Ortlieb is much cheaper.

    #1772163
    Heath Pitts
    BPL Member

    @heathpitts

    Locale: Nashville

    Your comment about Platy's making the water taste differently is confusing to me. I bought the platy over the camelbak because it didn't make my water taste differently. I have bought a big zip and a collapsible bottle and never noticed anything. Does platypus make some that cause a change in taste?

    #1772166
    todd
    BPL Member

    @funnymo

    Locale: SE USA

    Could it be the hose and not the bladder? My platy's are tasteless.

    #1772180
    Terry Trimble
    Member

    @socal-nomad

    Locale: North San Diego county

    I switched to the Source water bladders have antibacterial coating when I used to use a bladder because of antibacterial coating and the US Marines used them in Iraq and Afghanistan because it's a better system then platy's.

    What got me off the internal water bladder system was my brother got sick from his camelback that he used for 30 days with out washing it. It was his fault for not washing the bladder and air drying it out. BUT I HAVE QUESTION HOW MANY OF YOU TAKE THE TIME TO WASH YOUR WATTER BLADDERS?

    That's why I switched to 1 liter platy plus bottle with slime guard when they came out and Platypus switched to slime guard because it easier to air dry. Platypus realize that most people don't wash their bladder water carriers. What I don't get is why Platypus have not made their internal bladder systems with the slime guard plastic.

    Then Source started shipping to America their water bottle bladders I bought their 2 liter water bladder bottle version it the same diameter as 1 liter nalagen polycarb bottle and the same height as the platy plus and hold twice as much water and stand up by it's self when set on the ground. It fits in my water bottle pocket on my pack.

    Source are made in Israel and just a better product than the platys and camelback water systems.IMHO
    Terry

    #1773461
    David Ure
    Member

    @familyguy

    Sadly, a lot of reports of Source brand bottle failures in the field. See http://www.mec.ca.

Viewing 8 posts - 26 through 33 (of 33 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...