Topic

Grand Canyon Royal Arch route


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums General Forums General Lightweight Backpacking Discussion Grand Canyon Royal Arch route

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1272585
    Peter Bakwin
    BPL Member

    @pbakwin

    Has anyone been on the Royal Arch route lately?
    I have questions:
    – How's the drive in? Can I do it in a Subaru Outback (if dry)?
    – Where did you find water?
    – Is there a fixed rope on the "rappel"?
    Thanks!

    #1727199
    David Chenault
    BPL Member

    @davec

    Locale: Queen City, MT

    I have not been there lately.

    A skilled driver could do the drive in an Outback. Of greatest concern is lingering snow and especially mud. Some of the big ruts and oblique washouts can be very slick when wet.

    There was a nappy rope when I did it. If in a group bring 20-25 feet of webbing, have the last guy untie it, and spot him on the downclimb (which didn't look to bad). I brought 40 foot of webbing, lowered my pack, and went down hand over hand.

    An interesting project would be doing it in reverse, and climbing the rap.

    I found water in Royal Arch creek and in the river.

    It's totally doable in a day, btw.

    #1727234
    Peter Bakwin
    BPL Member

    @pbakwin

    Thanks! It's my intention to do it in a day.
    I've considered going in reverse. As a runner,
    it would be more efficient to descend the relatively
    good S. Bass trail and hike up Royal Arch. Also,
    get the long, dry Tonto section done earlier in the
    day & the return from Royal Arch drainage would be
    higher & so cooler. Sooo, it depends on the up
    climb of the "rappel". Sounds like you are saying
    it's not bad. I'm a passable scrambler. Comment?

    #1727288
    David Chenault
    BPL Member

    @davec

    Locale: Queen City, MT

    My recollection (as a former 5.12 climber, and from early 2008) is that the upclimb looked 5.7-9ish, short, but with boulders that made the landing unpleasant. I'd go for it in climbing shoes with a good spotter or two. Or you might luck out and find a fixed line of questionable worth.

    #1727335
    Peter Bakwin
    BPL Member

    @pbakwin

    Extremely helpful!
    I'm not going to commit to 5.7, much less 5.9,
    solo deep in the backcountry! But, if the rope
    were there that's a different story.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...