Topic
Weight carried vs, uh, weight carried.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › General Forums › General Lightweight Backpacking Discussion › Weight carried vs, uh, weight carried.
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Nov 1, 2010 at 10:58 pm #1660261
>> You just have to do what you can do, and keep at it.
Excellent advice. Most of us aren't athletes, we are hikers.
Nov 1, 2010 at 11:22 pm #1660264A lot of good points have been shared. I think the game changes a little when hiking for more than 7 days or so. Efficiency of movement and cardiovascular power become more important with elevation and long miles.
On my JMT hike last year I dropped about 15lbs over the 16 days. I am 6'2" and started the hike weighing about 205lbs. I purposely started the hike with some extra body fat and tanked up on calories at every stop in civilization. I had a 12lb base weight including the empty canister. You can only fit so many calories in a canister and it is easier to carry some extra calories around the midsection than in the pack. Makes the resupply strategy a little easier too! I couldn't have done the 130 miles from VVR to Whitney in 7 days with a Bearikade Weekender with out some extra love around the middle!
Ryan
Nov 2, 2010 at 2:55 pm #1660449AnonymousInactive"I purposely started the hike with some extra body fat and tanked up on calories at every stop in civilization…. You can only fit so many calories in a canister and it is easier to carry some extra calories around the midsection than in the pack. Makes the resupply strategy a little easier too! I couldn't have done the 130 miles from VVR to Whitney in 7 days with a Bearikade Weekender with out some extra love around the middle!"
It is a tried and proven technique. People have been doing it now for several tens of thousands of years, animals even longer. I use it all the time on trips in the 9-11 day range with great success.
Nov 2, 2010 at 4:53 pm #1660480Another thought I had is in regards to perceived effort. After dropping body weight and/or pack weight we may judge our current level of exertion to seem similar to past experiences. Judging the benefits based on your perceived effort can be misleading without tracking your gains in speed, distance covered, and calories burned. Soreness is not always a good indicator either.
No doubt you will be moving faster and more efficiently after dropping weight. For some this will mean bigger miles over tougher terrain which opens up the possibility of new challenges. Others will be content to cover the same distances and terrain as before, but it will be more emjoyable with more time for breaks and less fatigue at the end of the day.
Ryan
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.