Aug 21, 2010 at 4:56 pm #1262494
Isn't packrafting really a subdivision of ultralight or packable personal watercraft?
Surely it is not limited to rafts, which are little more than glorified innertubes with floors where your butt soaks in a puddle while it bounces over the rocks – or at least that has been my experience with them.
Maybe we should expand our horizons a bit beyond rafts to include any packable, lightweight personal watercraft.Aug 21, 2010 at 9:04 pm #1639401
What ultralight, packable personal watercraft are there besides rafts? Inner tubes? I think I saw an inflatable kayak once.Aug 21, 2010 at 10:20 pm #1639419Aug 23, 2010 at 8:57 am #1639749
I'm thinking there might be an alternative to the not-quite-boats like boogie boards and rafts. I guess I'll have to work that out.Aug 24, 2010 at 5:02 am #1639949
@dteneyLocale: Somewhere in the Alps
A good example of the use of such a watercraft is the expedition of Mike Horn along the Amazon. He crossed the Andes to the source of the Amazon, carrying his hydrospeed, then floated along the river to the east coast of south america. From what I know this was a specially manufactured boat in which he could store his equipment.Aug 24, 2010 at 11:26 am #1640055
@davecLocale: Crown of the Continent
Vick, it sounds like you haven't paddled a real packraft (which at the moment only equal Alpackas, or the NRS boat).
I would indeed argue that the weight, packability, versatility, and range of water that can be navigated in a packraft make them a functionally different category of boat. They look like other craft, but they way they let you travel in the wilderness is quite different.
Packrafts are like skis or mountain bikes in that they're efficient machines for moving through the landscape. All are utilitarian and amusing. Packrafts get special attention because they're the most efficient and universally applicable of technological aids to wilderness travel.
River boards are to packrafts as mountain unicycles are to mountain bikes.Aug 24, 2010 at 12:52 pm #1640079
has anyone considered using inflatable innertubes, or inflatable flotation devices. I've found several that are made tough and lightweight.Aug 24, 2010 at 1:46 pm #1640104
I have had one form of UL pack raft or another and inflatable canoes since the middle 70s. They are old tech (including 3# netweight, high pressure units). I have not tried an Alpacka or the new NRS raft, which are obviously top of the line and perform better than most other short-in-relation-to-width inflatables. On the other hand, I'm an experienced paddler, boat designer and builder so my expectations are pretty high.Aug 31, 2010 at 5:44 am #1641781
Alpacka rafts are a world away from inner tubes. Seriously tough, impressive little beasts!
AlFeb 7, 2011 at 1:54 pm #1693678
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.