Topic
BearVault BV450
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Commerce › Gear Deals › BearVault BV450
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 1, 2010 at 9:06 pm #1258445
$55.21 + free shipping @ http://www.campsaver.com
May 1, 2010 at 9:15 pm #1604798That's not a bad deal!
I would get one, except that I already have one.
–B.G.–
May 1, 2010 at 9:23 pm #1604801I'm debating between a BearVault 450 and a Bare Boxer Contender…
May 1, 2010 at 9:26 pm #1604803I have three bear canisters for comparison. The Garcia is the second generation. A little heavy and bulky. Works good and lasts a long time. The smaller BearVault is better and lighter. The twist lid locks in such a way that some people have fought with it for minutes at a time. I guess that is good. The BearBoxer is much smaller in diameter and weight. For 3 days, I would take the BearBoxer. For 4-5 days, I would take the BearVault. The Garcia may be collecting dust.
–B.G.–
May 1, 2010 at 9:35 pm #1604807Thanks, Bob. This is helpful.
May 1, 2010 at 9:37 pm #1604809he Bob, wanna sell that Garcia?
May 1, 2010 at 9:51 pm #1604813Hmmm. I hadn't thought about it much.
There must be quite a supply crisis if you guys are asking for a Garcia that is ten years old.
–B.G.–
May 1, 2010 at 10:00 pm #1604815I have a 3-day trip to Yosemite in May, and a week-long trip in PNW in August.
I'm hoping not to buy multiple bear canisters. The thing about buying into the middle — it could either be the perfect "do it both" — or it could end up being "neither here nor there". Looks like the Garcia fell into the second category in your case. Decisions, decisions…
May 1, 2010 at 10:25 pm #1604823I know that when the Garcia cans came out on the market over ten years ago, that it was a one-size-fits-all solution, and that was the only brand/game in town until the competitors came along. You know there isn't too much weight difference between a large and a small size, so maybe a person would want to buy only the large and not fool with a small. On the other hand, that flies in the face of everything UL.
I saw a guy backpacking in Yosemite with his DIY bear canister. It was a RubberMaid kitchen container with duct tape. Obviously no rangers caught him, or else they would have thrown the book at him.
–B.G.–May 1, 2010 at 11:02 pm #1604840"DIY bear canister. It was a RubberMaid kitchen container with duct tape."
Amazing.
Hard to picture without the real thing, but I wonder if there's any way to cram 6 days' worth of food into the Bare Boxer? Aarrgh… wishful thinking.
May 1, 2010 at 11:35 pm #1604841I wonder if there's any way to cram 6 days' worth of food into the Bare Boxer?
You would have to get pretty creative.
You can probably get your six days into a Bearikade Scout, which is not much bigger or heavier, though. It's rated for 5 days, and BPL folks have reported the Bearikade ratings somewhat conservative, so you may be able to cram 6 days' food in there.
Scout is same height, 1.6" bigger diameter, and two ounces heavier. Of course your wallet will be $155 lighter with the Scout instead of the Bare Boxer.
–MV
May 1, 2010 at 11:44 pm #1604844At least they did for me a couple of years ago, when I wanted something between the weekender and expedition.
Where in the Pacific Northwest are you traveling? Bear canisters are not required in most places; with areas of Olympic National Park being one. (They have bear wires in some section of the park). Mt. Rainier does not require you to carry a bear canister, for instance. Nor does North Cascades National Park.
Can someone really get six days worth of food in a 500 cubic inch canister? I guess you don't have to carry all of it in the canister – you definitely could carry the first day outside the canister.
Dirk
May 1, 2010 at 11:59 pm #1604850"Hard to picture without the real thing, but I wonder if there's any way to cram 6 days' worth of food into the Bare Boxer?"
No way. Three days, yes. Possibly four. If you were foraging along the trail for berries and catching fish, possibly six.
Oh, wait. I just heard something about a new large BearBoxer.
–B.G.–
May 2, 2010 at 10:08 am #1604933Yes, just confirmed that canisters are not required in the PNW. Hoorah!
I'll go with the Bare Boxer Contender for my 3 days at Yosemite (thanks to Christopher Graf's recommendation). And I'll use my Ursack for my week-long PNW hike. :)
May 2, 2010 at 7:04 pm #1605087Benjamin,
Where are you planning to hike in the NW?
Btw, I believe that canisters are required in Olympic now. It has been a little while since I've been but I think they removed many of the cables. I did a 6-day trip there in 2004 and did not get to the ranger station in Hoodsport in time to rent a bear canister, so we just hung our food on the cables. Maybe someone else could comment…
Edit: oops sorry to hijack this thread!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.