Topic
Are Nunataks good or just lack of competition?
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Are Nunataks good or just lack of competition?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Dec 12, 2009 at 5:35 am #1552990
Myself and a few UK backpackers have been pestering PHD for a while about making quilts John. There was only a few of us in the UK using quilts though. The Golite Ultra has been quite popular since it was released in the UK however, and so has raised the quilts profile. Hopefully PHD have realised there might be a market for them. :)
Dec 12, 2009 at 6:48 am #1552998For the OP: Tom, there are plenty of products that will keep you as warm as those from Nunatak, but none at catalog level of production are as light. The newer, lightest products get the attention at this forum. If Nunatak does not evolve over the next ten years from their current products, they will become what WM is now, known quality with little to discuss since almost everyone posting will have already tried several of their products.
Dec 12, 2009 at 9:40 am #1553023I think the poster should make it clear that he did not write this article and that it is not his bag. Charles Lindsey wrote the review so I don't think we can know the full story here. The bag looks unlofted to me, meaning it has not even been shaken to enhance the loft at all. And, it would take some time to redistribute the down in a bag like that. We have to assume that Lindsey new what he was doing. His description of having only 2 layers of nylon left over his chest seems like quite an exaggeration after opening the article praising the loft. Good down does not just decide to go wandering around in a bag like that. Perhaps it was underfilled by accident? The reviewer seems to make no effort to take this up with Nunatak, which does not surprise me.
The reviewer does not even mention taking up these issues with Nunatak. This is probably because he never really 'owned' the bag and was just reviewing it and really had no incentive.
For the OP: Reposting this article without explaining that it is not his bag OR his review is off the mark. If somebody just goes to the provided links it would be easy to think the poster wrote the review and even took the photos. I seriously think there is something quite wrong with the original review – as in what's wrong with this picture? The review is 7 years old as well! Maybe we can dredge up something more current? Backpacking.net sells gear also. Could it be, that not being able to sell Nunatak gear puts a slant on things? I don't like conflicts of interest like these.
I don't think a down sleeping bag could that lumpy unless you wanted it too look that way. I think if the problems were that severe, then the reviewer should have had some contact with the manufacture just to find out what's up (before publishing this kind of stuff). If there was no interaction then I want to know why. If there was, I want to know that story. I say this after having been a dealer for Western Mountaineering for 10 years, among other brands, and after having owned many other brands, including currently a nice Nunatak, so I have experience in the matter.
Dec 12, 2009 at 10:26 pm #1553195Nicely put Dan,
It did seem that the OP has a bit of negativity about Nunatak. I only have the one quilt and mukluks right now from them (plus a pair of mukluks I got for Dave)and they have all been excellent quality. And dealing with Tom has been just as wonderful as it is dealing with Henry Shires and the guys at Trail Designs. Gear manufacturers like them make us realize what we miss when stock market price drives manufacturers decisions.
(I can't wait for my Arc Expedition to get here. Merry Christmas to me…)
Dec 13, 2009 at 8:07 am #1553236"It did seem that the OP has a bit of negativity about Nunatak."
Hi Raymond! You're gonna love that Expedition!
About the OP, I don't know. I don't think Tom necessarily has any negativity about Nunatak. He's had a bad experience with other cottage quilt makers, and from what I remember of his other posts, he's not one to throw a lot of money around at gear unless warranted (and maybe not even then!). I think he's just concerned about the (relatively) high cost of Nunatak gear, and wants to ensure he's going to get his money's worth, especially if he's going to have to wait a few months to get it. Certainly a 2002 review is pretty meaningless, but perhaps it's the only one he could find.
FWIW, I don't know Tom at all, I don't pretend to know his motivations or his personality. Nor am I trying to speak for him.
Dec 13, 2009 at 10:31 am #1553269"I don't think a down sleeping bag could that lumpy unless you wanted it too look that way."
Amen. My exact thoughts. It looks like it might have got wet and clumped, or the cat just finished sleeping on it, or something along those lines.
Dec 13, 2009 at 11:04 am #1553274Thanks for being with me on this you guys. It's a good thing we don't have to rely on reviews like that any longer. I remember what it was like before the internet, with magazine reviews, where nothing could be refutted in public. Looking back, things were primitive, and people at the mags could say whatever they wanted.
Dec 13, 2009 at 11:46 am #1553286I just bought an Edge on clearance and received it in one day after speaking with Tom. Same excellent quality as my Arc Specialist. Nunatak makes superb quality quilts. They cost a lot but they aren't expensive if one considers the quality. Buy one, take care of it, you won't be disappointed.
Dec 13, 2009 at 3:38 pm #1553359Since I owned and used the model bag pictured by the OT and reviewed by Charles I want to comment on the assertion that;
"I don't think a down sleeping bag could that lumpy unless you wanted it too look that way."Dan, you are correct insofar as the bag has not been “primed” for use… however, it is incorrect that the bag could not look that lumpy without some intention on the reviewers part.
To explain, let me answer the OT's question; “WHY would someone build a bag like that?”
My original Alpinist was a 24 ounce bag made from Pertex Microlight, 800 fill down, no zipper, very wide baffle spacing, and a very narrow cut from the waist down- it was designed to be the closest thing you could have to just draping down over you.
When initially taken from its stuff sack, it looked exactly as that picture shows; lumpy. It required a bit of fluffing and shaking to allow for full loft. Even then, the 2.5 inch baffle height combined with, if I recall correctly, 12 ounces of down and 9-12 inch baffle spacing, did lead to underfilled areas. If I shifted ALL of the down to the top and did not move around in my sleep, it truly was warm to its rating. If not, you could very well have large areas devoid of any fill.
That said, the bag was well made and even held up to one very memorable night when it held two people… cozy.
I do not know the minds of Nunatak’s designers, but I assume that the original Alpinist simply required too much in the way of user interaction to be a viable commercial product. It was however a well thought out, purpose built product, even if one that was entirely too finicky to for most users. I sold mine and now use a Marmot Helium and WM Antelope.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.