Aug 29, 2009 at 1:39 pm #1238891
I'm currently researching Ti pots and I'm having trouble deciding if the non-stick coatings are worth the weight. I'm looking at 1.3L Evernew pots since I'm usually camping with my wife.
According to EvernewAmerica.com, the regular 1.3L 'ultralight' pot and lids weighs 130g (4.6oz) for the pot and lid. The non-stick version of this pot weighs in at 170g (6.0oz).
My normal usage for this pot will be boiling water, cooking pasta, couscous etc. but occasionally I might want to fry stuff (ie. if I catch a fish or pack pancakes).
So what are peoples thoughts on the coating? Does it work? Does it hold up over time? I've read the reviews on this site and most seem favourable but seem to question how long the coating will last for. Is raw titanium a pain to clean?
Thanks guys!Aug 29, 2009 at 2:59 pm #1523683
@mocs123Locale: Southeast Tennessee
I have the regular 0.6 L Evernew pot and the Snow Peak 700ml uncoated pot but have never had a non stick ti cook pot, so I can't say how well holds up, but Ti in and of itself doesn't do well for cooking. Titanium doesn't transfer heat very evenly and tends to burn things. If you want to do real cooking I would recommend going with either Anodized Aluminum or at least a non stick pot.Aug 29, 2009 at 3:11 pm #1523685
@btolleyLocale: San Francisco Bay Area
I use the Evernew titanium frying pan with non stick coating for frying eggs, pancakes, steaks, stirfry, fish. (I like to eat well on the trail :))
The non stick coating works fine in conjunction with a little olive oil and I cook with a teflon spork or a little wooden spatula to avoid scratching the surface. As to its longevity, my pan is on its 4th season now, and the non stick surface is intact.
What you have to watch out for is heat distribution and heat control. The titanium does not work as well as aluminum as a cooking surface, say for example compared with MSR Blacklite. For example when I want to cook a thick bacon wrapped steak, I take the MSR pan.
If you plan on catching and frying a lot of large (thick) trout over a multiday trip, you might want to consider a heavier pan.Aug 29, 2009 at 3:12 pm #1523686
I just boil water to make tea or dump into a freezer bag meal! For which plain Ti is just fine!Aug 29, 2009 at 3:38 pm #1523689
I wonder if using a taller caldera cone to raise the pot an inch or so further from the stove would even out the heat for easier frying? There's a great YouTube vid on making your own cone.
Right now I have a Pocket Rocket which does a very poor job of spreading out the flame but I have a FeatherFire alcohol stove coming in the mail. I think this stove, plus a homemade, slighter taller caldera cone and 1.3L non-stick Ti Evernew might be a nice setup that allows me to fry on occasion.
So does anyone fry in an untreated Ti pot? I don't fry much but I'd like to have the option. I don't mind doing a little scrubbing after dinner, but if it's going to make frying impossible then that's no good.Aug 31, 2009 at 10:07 am #1523980
@lenchik101Locale: Pacific Northwest (USA)
I have a 1.3 Evernew Ti pot with non-stick coating. I've had it for 6 years now. This pot held up pretty well. Non-stick doesn't mean you can cook in it, and it won't stick like in your reg. cookware; but rather that it will clean much easier, which i definitely appreciate. this pot has been thru many trips, and once even put directly over fire. i eat directly from the pot, and i use the titanium spork, which is probably not recommended for the coating but works for me. you would experience some scratches and scrapes over time, but it doesn't change the functionality of the pot (non stick coating doesn't come off). I think cooking for two warrants the non stick, since you are already dividing the weight btwn the two and you are cooking larger volumes, hence easier to clean. i bring a mini sponge with me and just add some water, scrub, and rinse. i don't use soap, sometimes some sand and mud to get the grease off.Aug 31, 2009 at 10:12 am #1523981
@lenchik101Locale: Pacific Northwest (USA)
actually, i tried pancakes in this pot, and it was a disaster. perhaps you need lots of oil to make it work. but i gave up on pancakes. also if fish, i'd rather wrap it in foil and cook either over fire, or bury in hot coals and cook that way.Aug 31, 2009 at 12:26 pm #1524011
It was perhaps not for nothing that Trangia changed from Ti to a new thinner aluminium for their new ultralight series 25 and 27. These are even marginally lighter than their Ti predecessors, spread the heat mnore evenly, and apparently save on fuel. For the cooking pot the hard anodized version is fine, and is cleaned easily. For the frying pan I went for the non stick version, and that is very good indeed. On the Trangia delicate frying is helped by the greater distance from the flame for the frying pan compared to the cooking pot. I too like to eat real food.
The bad news is that I know of no other and lighter alcohol stove/pot system that is any good with frying. The Trangia 27 really is heavy, unfortunately, even in its UL form. The Clikstand is a lighter Trangia in many respects, but not with frying. Frying pans dont fit its windscreen, and neither can you increase the distance between flame and pan.Aug 31, 2009 at 10:01 pm #1524133
Thanks for all the advice and experiences. It's very helpful.
Pancakes are a tough meal to do in any pot….or even a frying pan, when camping. I had some while camping a few weeks ago and they weren't that great. I don't think I"m going to bother with them in the future. That doesn't leave me with too many hot breakfast options though besides instant oatmeal.Sep 1, 2009 at 6:21 am #1524184
A super slick non-stick frypan is what one needs for pancakes…with a great recipe :-DSep 1, 2009 at 12:13 pm #1524272
@acrosomeLocale: Back in the Front Range
Well, if you're truly interested in baking in general, or poaching fish, consider this widget:
I do not have one, but it looks interesting, and I've heard a couple of positive comments about them. It is, however, another 4 ounces to carry. But it would remove the concerns about the durability of non-stick surfaces, while still letting you do much more than freezer-bag cooking.Sep 1, 2009 at 1:24 pm #1524293
Dean it is pretty easy to make a Fauxbaker to fit the smaller pots most of us carry. (Their UL version is still for say a 2L pot)
http://www.trailcooking.com/thefauxbakerSep 2, 2009 at 3:37 am #1524484
@acrosomeLocale: Back in the Front Range
So it won't fit in, say, a 1.3L Evernew? Interesting.
The Fauxbaker is brilliant! I'm sure it works, but does it work as efficiently as the heat pipe array of the bakepacker? Hmm. Sounds like a BPL technical article waiting to happen… :o)
Random Thought: If you made the Fauxbaker out of titanium it could double as the firepan for a Tri-Ti caldera cone in woodburning mode.Sep 2, 2009 at 6:30 am #1524502
What it comes down to is how wide your pot is, on whether or not the UL BP works ;-)
And hey, a DIY project is fun. Basically the point of it is to create steam and keep the food out of the water. So one can come up with many ways to do it – using a platform or even a mug in a pot.Sep 2, 2009 at 7:31 am #1524513
I've used both and prefer uncoated ti. The non-stick isn't exactly non-stick in ti and you have to worry about overheating it and using non-abrasives on it. Also, non-stick coatings can emit noxious fumes when overheated. I have cooked on uncoated ti and scortched food and just burn it off in the fire or rub it off with sand.Sep 2, 2009 at 11:05 am #1524566
What about cooking stuff like dehydrated pasta (ie. Sidekicks) and stuff like couscous. This is probably what I cook the most. I'm not sure if this would create a sticky mess with untreated Ti or not.Sep 2, 2009 at 12:59 pm #1524595
Couscous isn't an issue as all you need to do is boil water, take off stove and add in the dry items. That won't stick – especially if you use oil.
As for actual cooking in the pot, Sidekicks, Lipton/Knorr sidedishes, etc – yes, you can have major fry on's with untreated Ti, Al or steel pots. Non stick or hard anodized Al is your better bet when you are doing real cooking, where you have a thick meal.Sep 3, 2009 at 10:30 am #1524809
@pugslieLocale: SLO County
by Dan Durston (dandydan)
"So does anyone fry in an untreated Ti pot? I don't fry much but I'd like to have the option. I don't mind doing a little scrubbing after dinner, but if it's going to make frying impossible then that's no good."
I made eggs and steak this morn using a untreated Ti pan with a good dose of olive oil on a .125" (8 gauge) 5"x5" solid copper heat diffuser plate on a SVEA 123 stove running at just above simmering mode. The pan still had hot spots (uneven heat transfer). Still got burnt eggs thou not as bad as before. With the steak cooking, you kinda can see where the hots spots were by how the oil just "burned" there. Clean-up was defintely easier having used the diffuser plate. The thing weighs 8ozs so that defeats the purpose of having titanium cookware. A coated Ti pan might have done better.
b.ginSep 3, 2009 at 7:18 pm #1524940
I'm still mulling this decision over. My current 1.5L hard anodized aluminum MSR pot/lid/lifter weighs 303g (10.7 oz) and an Evernew 1.3L Ti setup would weigh just 130g (4.6oz) which is a lot of weight saved. The non-stick is 170g (6.0oz).
That's an awful lot of extra weight I'm carrying right now. I'm trying to decide if I should go with untreated Ti and just take the aluminum pot for trips when I'm going to cook a lot, or if I should buy the non-stick Ti and try to do everything with that.Sep 4, 2009 at 6:07 am #1525014
Dn, there is nothing wrong with having multiple pot setups. In all honesty, it makes life easier. You have the plain Ti for trips where every ounce counts, where all you do is boil water. You keep the HAA set for when you want to do cooking and the miles are easier!
(Of course this advice is coming from someone who has at least 15 pot sets currently being used…..)Sep 4, 2009 at 6:10 am #1525015
I'm with Sarah. I use a small ti pot when just boiling water for freezer bag meals (which is most of the time). I also have an HAA pot and fry pan for when we actually cook. I made pancakes in a non-stick ti fry pan once and it didn't turn out that great.Sep 5, 2009 at 4:54 pm #1525288
I'm leaning towards the non-stock Ti, and just avoiding foods that are potentially really messy (ie. pancakes). I'm kinda sick of eating pancakes anyways.
Would foods like Sidekicks be okay in a non-stick Ti pot?Sep 5, 2009 at 6:01 pm #1525306
Only if you NEVER take your eyes off of that untreated Ti pot and stir often. You also need to not use a stove that is going at turbo heat (like a Pocket Rocket). Otherwise, yes, you will be looking at a good soak job.
But honestly, you could do the same weight for half the cost with HAA and have less risk of burnt on food.Sep 5, 2009 at 6:13 pm #1525311
I think you mis-read. I said I was leaning towards non-stick Ti, not untreated. I think the non-stick will be fine for stuff like Sidekicks.
The stove I will be using is a FeatherFire alcohol stove which has fully adjustable heat output so I can keep it low.
"But honestly, you could do the same weight for half the cost with HAA and have less risk of burnt on food."
Really? I can get a HAA pot for around 170g that is about 1.3L capacity? My HAA 1.5L MSR pot is 259g and that's with no handles so I need a 44g lifter too (or wool gloves).Sep 5, 2009 at 6:30 pm #1525319
OK here's my vote…
Get a GSI bugaboo pot. The non-stick really works… you can easily do pancakes and whatever you want. I've had mine for quite a few years now and it works a treat. There are few reviews on backpackgeartest you can read and they are all very positive too.
The base is nice and thick and cooking is very even.
Here's the catch. You have to buy the bugboo pot (or alternatively the 'hard anodized extreme' version) in a set of two pots. I think it's about $30 for both, and they both come with frying pan lids.
# Large pot: 7.5 oz (212 g)
# Small pot: 5.4 oz (152 g)
Don't be fooled by the "official" volume of these pots (supposedly 1.4L and 0.95L). I own an evernew 1.3L pot and it is exactly the same volume as the GSI small pot. It appears that GSI significantly underestimates the capacity of their pots, or perhaps doesn't measure them exactly to the brim. I reckon the GSI small is about 1.3L and the large is about 2L.
So when you compare the small GSI pot to the Evernew non-stick, it's actually a bit lighter and works much better. Note though that the weight doesn't include the lid (which acts as a separate frying pan, and so is much heavier than a normal lid). Unless I'm doing real gourmet cooking I just leave the lid behind and use some foil or something.
Lastly, the GSI pots have a much underappreciated feature that you hardly find on any other pots… a spiral turned base. The base has a series of ridges etched into it in concentric circles, meaning that it does not slide around when you put it on a stove.
Anyway, check it out. These pots are the bees-knees and I suspect the only reason we don't hear more about them is because most folks are just boiling water and using an uncoated pot (which of course is lighter).
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.