Topic
You’ve got to be kidding!
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Administration & Support › Website & Forum Support › You’ve got to be kidding!
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Dec 28, 2008 at 10:03 am #1232877
fe·ces is profanity? (your auto censor wouldn't publish a post with this word in it). Not according to my dictionary.
Dec 28, 2008 at 10:13 am #1466852One word for the moderators: silly.
But the English language is rich. Try using scat or dung instead.
Dec 28, 2008 at 11:13 am #1466864Good point, Ben. Maybe there's a need for a wiki-type thesaurus page for people who need to look up precise/useful synonyms for banned words. I've noticed that "frig," "friggin'," and "frigging" all get through–but "fe*es" won't. Sometimes the best response to excessive censorship is to circumvent the ignorant censor ;-}.
LIBERTAS+PAX PACIS
Dec 28, 2008 at 11:39 am #1466868Gear whor and gear sluut are both precise terms frequently used on backpacking forums — but can't be used here. Methinks the immature moderators still haven't outgrown their hangup's from childhood.
Dec 28, 2008 at 12:39 pm #1466876Hey guys, it's not my doing!
As far as I know, the system simply uses a filter package which came with the system software. No custom dictionaries used, no human intervention, at all.
Low on the list of priorities right now however …
Cheers
Dec 28, 2008 at 1:17 pm #1466887Benjamin T Wrote: “Gear whor and gear sluut are both precise terms frequently used on backpacking forums — but can't be used here. Methinks the immature moderators still haven't outgrown their hangup's from childhood.”
Personally, I guess, I find some of the terms such as “gear whor” and “gear sluut” a bit disconcerting, largely because of their connotative associations with sexist valuations and posturings. As a writer, I would be the last to suggest that words are inherently neutral. Nevertheless, I also find it disturbing that some people imagine that words have almost magical powers to create realities. I found it outrageously funny when a (very linguistically conservative) buddy of mine told me he had spent all afternoon “frigging around with his gear.” Granted, the word has been slowly drifting from its original meaning for the last few decades—but, as an intensifier, the word frig is still much closer to its original meaning than a word like “f**k”. What really bothers me, though, is when ignorant programmers fashion silly programs that inhibit the free and accurate sharing of information. Two years ago I taught at a religiously conservative college that wouldn’t allow me to search the internet for “Wessex Anglo Saxon Manuscripts”. Of course, "Wessex" was one of the problems—but it turned out that the other problem was “manuscripts”.
Roger C. Wrote: “As far as I know, the system simply uses a filter package which came with the system software. No custom dictionaries used, no human intervention, at all.”
***************It never occurred to me that you would personally be the censor, Roger–in fact, it is kind of amusing to imagine you scouring the site for dirty words :-0. Still, it would ideal if SOMEDAY the profanity filters could be more liberalized, the BPL definition of profanity clearly and obviously stated, and then perhaps people could simply report posts that seem to stray “too far” from the site’s rules of civility.
OK. Enough of this. My shift is about to end, and I’ve got to get home and figure out why my #@!!*+$ sewing machine keeps snarling up in spite of all attempts to adjust it.
LIBERTAS+PAX PACIS
Dec 28, 2008 at 1:28 pm #1466889Roger:
No, I did not assume it was your doing. But I did assume an automatic filter that is also customizable. I find it hard to believe that BPL's program filter isn't customizable.
Dec 28, 2008 at 3:21 pm #1466915Hi
I got by using SOB – Son of Balrog? and had a lot of fun with that.Dec 28, 2008 at 3:30 pm #1466918I couldn't write POOOP (with two O's)
I use the term POO-POO now, and I feel content…
Dec 28, 2008 at 6:11 pm #1466940Hey Bill this is Balrog you can't pin it on me I barely knew the girl. As for beating the censors how 'bout Phil Ratio? Or is that going to far.
Dec 30, 2008 at 1:58 pm #1467191no human intervention, at all.
A recent scientific test (the G-Carlinean phenomenum) indicated that if there is in fact no human intervention then there is strong evidence that there are acts of God to maintain forum cleanliness.
Amen!
: )
Dec 30, 2008 at 7:23 pm #1467247no human intervention, at all
Well, 'no human intervention' managed to take down my SNAFU post. That was silly.
You think these BPL folks can make themselves just a bit more useful by answering my question HERE instead?
Dec 30, 2008 at 11:02 pm #1467271Ben
John Shannon answered your question days ago. Scroll up in the other thread and see what he wrote.
Cheers
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.