Topic
UL Wind/rain pants – which would you choose?
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › UL Wind/rain pants – which would you choose?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jun 12, 2008 at 1:49 pm #1229519
I am now rethinking every item in preparation for my summer Colorado mountains trip this July. For summer backpacking in Colorado mountains, which wind/rain pants would you take?
http://www.backcountry.com/store/MTB0064/MontBell-America-Inc-Ultralight-Wind-Pants-Mens.html
http://www.backcountry.com/store/GOL0076/GoLite-Whim-Pant-Mens.html
http://www.backcountry.com/store/GOL0141/GoLite-Reed-Pant-Mens.html
Can I get by with the Montbell wind pants, or do I need to go heavier to get sufficient rain protection?
Jun 12, 2008 at 2:56 pm #1438054I don't know about your area much, but for temps 30*F and above in rain I use a wind pant, not a rain pant. Rain pants just don't breathe well enough for my hiking exertion level at those temps. I you meander at 1-1.5mph rain pants would be fine though.
I've had the whims and ulwind, and prefer the montbells because they are lighter and more comfortable, although more expensive, as golite stuff can be found on sale easier. Some say the whims breathe better, but I have not found this to be true, YMMV of course.
Jun 12, 2008 at 3:00 pm #1438056I have the Montbell UL Wind Pants and they will be fine for rain in temps above 40-50ish degrees. You will get wet in downpours no doubt, but they keep you warm. They pack very small, smaller than an OR Ion Pullover.
I have no experience with the weather in Colorado though, so…
Jun 12, 2008 at 3:09 pm #1438057Colorado mountains in summer? Trails? If so, then we are not talking about thick growths, rock scrambling or bushwhacking.
I highly recommend that totally windproof and rainproof — but amazingly breathable Driduck pants. Cheap and light as heck too!
Jun 12, 2008 at 3:28 pm #1438062Being from Colorado, I believe the jacket is more important than the pants. I generally get by with nylon trail running shorts and just let my legs and feet get wet. You'll be wet anyway much of the time depending upon your altitude and location. Choose shoes wisely and have a proper jacket and or just a cheap poncho to protect you during intermittent downpours. Rain here generally comes in the afternoon and USUALLY does not last all that long. If you're on a budget get a cheap Walmart poncho and call it good. Spend money on decent fast drying trail shoes and an ultralight rain shirt with a hood and bring some extra socks. I often use nylon/spandex/lycra type trail socks. They dry fast! Nylon zip offs are just fine for pants during most summer trips. I do use some Golite,[ Whim?], they're an older version, pants at 4.5 ozs. They're very thin. I mostly carry them om trail runs with A Golite Hooded wind shirt and a PowerStretch pullover or just the cut off arms from an old one. The only other thing I really recomend is a nice lightweight windstopper vest. The vest is without a doubt my favorite go to piece of clothing. You can layer with it or use it in summer without any shirt at all as conditions require. It's wind and waterproof/very water resistant.
Peter
Jun 12, 2008 at 4:53 pm #1438077I have an older pair of Montane Featherlite pants. They are 4 oz. with leg zips. The leg zips are mighty nice. I think mine are made of pertex quantum fabric. They breath well too. I couple the featherlite pants with a driducks jacket to make a cost effective rain suit. I don't bushwack with this set up. I think the latest featherlite pants use microlite fabric. The featherlite pants are harder to find than the golite or montbell products.
Paul
Jun 12, 2008 at 5:53 pm #1438084OOPS! the featherlite pants have ankle zips not leg zips.
PaulJun 12, 2008 at 6:03 pm #1438085Hey Dave,
If you want some cheap ultra light pants check out the Sierra Designs Microlights. I have a size small and after removing tags and elastic ankle cuffs they weight only 5.3 oz , but the best part is they are only $28.
Jun 12, 2008 at 9:11 pm #1438104AnonymousInactivePeter,
Which brand of windstopper vest?Jun 13, 2008 at 6:44 am #1438143Tom,
I personally use and like the Mountain Hardwear Windstopper Tech Vest. Some might consider it just a bit heavy at 9.5 ozs, but for me it's more than worth it. It's all about finding the proper fit. There are lots of options out there now, as this has become a popular piece of gear. Even my vest required some modification to suit me. I had to cut an inch or so off the long collar. It was just too high for me.
By the way, I saw the Mountain Hardwear vest on the REI Outlet website a few days ago. You might check it out. They were offering an additional 20% off last week.
Peter
Jun 13, 2008 at 7:57 am #1438154Joshua,
I have these pants already. I used them last year, and they were OK, but I was just thinking of ways to save an ounce or two. The medium weigh around 5.75 oz with the stuff sack.
Jun 13, 2008 at 1:42 pm #1438217Ben,
Do you know how much the Driducks pants weigh (size medium)? (Actual, not listed weight).
It appears that the Driducks is sold as a set on this website (for 14.95 for both?), am I right?
Jun 13, 2008 at 2:42 pm #1438231the montbell ul wind pants are amazing! they are 2.5 ounces and pack up so small you will be grinning for like a week. of course, you have to pay to play with these– they are among the most expensive. if you hunt, you can find them on sale though…
i use these in conjunction with the SMD gatewood cape as a shelter/ full-on rain protection. in other words, i put on the wind shirt/ pants under the cape when its raining steady and that protects me from rain that gets in under the poncho b/c of wind.
but having the golite wisp windshirt (2.5 oz, medium), the montbell ul windpants (2.5 with stuff sack, large, side note:sizing is small so go one size up), and the SMD gatewood cape i have wind and rain protection, a pack cover, plus a shelter for exactly one pound. o, the stakes add a couple of ounces.
but still, that is hard to beat.
i also have the reed pants. they work well in rain. they are definitely a thicker, less breathable material than the montbells but will repel more rain before wetting out than the montbell pants. of course, they are double the weight.
Jun 13, 2008 at 3:33 pm #1438247AnonymousInactivePeter,
I was sort of wondering if that wasn't it. The MH Tech Windstopper vest is my go to wind shirt for snowshoeing out here in the Cascades. Paired with a Patagucci R1 Hoody, it's all I ever need unless the weather really goes south.
20% off at REI Outlet, huh? Hmmmmm, maybe I should salt one away…..? Thanks for the heads up.
TomJun 13, 2008 at 9:48 pm #1438307I just ordered a couple sets of Driducks. The XL sets I got weigh 11.1 ounces once I pulled out the hood string with oversized cordlocks. The pants are 4.8 ounces. Would speculate that the mediums might be 4 ounces or less?
Jun 13, 2008 at 10:02 pm #1438310I like the montane feather lite pants for wind pants. I always bring these unless I'm expecting heavy rain, when which I would bring Golite Reed rain pants instead.
Jun 14, 2008 at 9:23 am #1438347I have successfully used the driduck pants and was impressed with weight and functionality (just do not get them close to heat!).
I found that they were very bulky though. I would give an ounce or two back and pay a few bucks more to have them take up less room in my pack.
How does this group view volume as opposed to weight? I am getting ready to haul a bear canister for the first time (after going light) and I am fearful that space is going to be very limited once I shove that canister in there! Is it always about weight???
Jun 14, 2008 at 9:39 pm #1438431I use a set of breathable gear from Cabela's; they claim their "Micropack" jackets are less than 6 ounces, which feels about right. I'm guessing the pants are about 4 ounces. The set breathes well enough to use as windbreakers, and they've held up through a few weeks of bushwacking with only a little rip to show for it. My only complaint is that they only come in camo. I like that they use neoprene tabs instead of cordlocks for the hood.
Edit: To answer your volume concern, I had the same issue when I had to pack a bear canister for the first time. I picked this brand of raingear because it claimed to squish down to a tiny package, and I find my set is a little larger than big rolled-up winter socks once they're in their stuffsacks. The sack that came with the pants was too large, so I replaced it with the tiny silnylon sack that my Integral Designs compression sack came packaged in. On that note, I find compression stuffsacks for the sleeping bag & clothes are more useful than regular stuffsacks even though they're a tad heavier – my gear wouldn't fit in my bag without them.
Jun 15, 2008 at 10:03 am #1438463Which online retailer has sell Driducks?
Jun 15, 2008 at 10:12 am #1438465Google and you'll see.
I am surprised by the 'bulky' comment. For me anyway, Driducks fold down just as small as most any nylon jackets. As impressively light and compact as they are, the thing that truly impresses me the most is its extreme breathability! For trail use — I'd say Driducks are the best wp/b layer out there.
Warning: Driducks sizes are off by at least two sizes! I normally wear a Medium. But the "Small" that I got is actually bigger than most Large that I know!
Jun 15, 2008 at 11:42 am #1438469One thing to consider I think is what you intend to use the pants for. If they are merely for rain, the DriDucks will work (but be careful as the rear seam is very fragile). Don't expect to wear them a lot & be very careful if squatting. (Side note: Driduck pants with a blown out seam convert nicely to chaps).
If you want pants that you can also use for warmth as a back-up layer, I'd recommend going with something a bit sturdier.
Jun 15, 2008 at 1:42 pm #1438477You can get them on BPL…here's another retailer I've used (they're on eBay too) http://www.thegearlessmachine.com/
Dec 11, 2008 at 8:43 am #1463662DriDucks: a few notes for those who are new to DriDucks, on qualities for which I wasn't fully prepared.
– They're better than I expected: fantastically breathable; very light; pack to size of a…two-person freeze dried meal; cheap (which turns out to be a good thing).
– But: when people here say "not durable," that is very, very true.
The word "durable" does not apply to this clothing in any sense. Normally, I'm very careful with my gear and have had things last decades without damage, but I tore my spanking new DriDucks twice the first time out on their test run, while bicycling in the rain. 1) tore when I simply clamped on my metal cuff-clamps, 2) tore when my pedal grazed my leg. Of course, the tear seals up with duct tape. (Stylish.) I suggest anticipating tears even with moderate care.
But, I'm blown away by the airiness and fully intend to take them on my upcoming 5-wk trip to NZealand. (Talk to me in 6 weeks and ask me how they worked out.)
– Robert
Dec 11, 2008 at 8:59 am #1463665Just get a pair of Rab eVENT pants and that will cover you for pretty much everything. I've worn them in fairly warm conditions and didn't sweat. They breathe great, stop enough wind for legs, and are waterproof. I've also found them to be very durable.
Dec 11, 2008 at 2:27 pm #1463743This is lightweight and can be used for a ground cloth, etc.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.